Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Guess the Grade with a new twist. Guess (4) 1980 Topps Bird RC/Erving/Magic RC at one time! *Results

secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭✭

Guess the Grade with a new twist. Guess (4) 1980 Topps Bird RC/Erving/Magic RC at one time!

I thought this would be fun for everyone. Not necessarily any hidden tricks here so don't guess obscenely low thinking you can outwit the game. :)

This may be one of the hardest cards to determine grading no matter how sharp your corners are due to 50% or higher of the population carrying some existence of PD/OC/MC or numerous other known issues. These are all PSA graded.

****1980 Topps Bird RC/Erving/Magic RC****

I will reveal the 4 grades Sunday night after 10 EST. PSA cards and/or this card does not scan well for me, but hopefully you can gauge enough knowing the corners are sharp and backs are clean. 1 of these cards I believe is under-graded FWIW, so I will also be using this as a gauge myself!

_*Tip: Only one card has a qualifier on it. _

*click for larger photo

1.
2.
3.
4.

Comments

  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,720 ✭✭✭✭✭

    8
    8pd
    7
    7

  • Options
    JBrulesJBrules Posts: 2,140 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 1, 2017 4:23AM

    1) PSA 9
    2) PSA 8 PD
    3 )PSA 7
    4) PSA 8

  • Options
    ldfergldferg Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭

    1) PSA 8
    2) PSA 8 PD
    3 )PSA 9 PD
    4) PSA 9 PD



    Thanks,

    David (LD_Ferg)



    1985 Topps Football (starting in psa 8) - #9 - started 05/21/06
  • Options
    KendallCatKendallCat Posts: 3,170 ✭✭✭✭✭

    8
    8PD
    7
    7

  • Options
    rtimmerrtimmer Posts: 1,348 ✭✭✭✭

    8,7,8PD and 7

    Follow me at LinkedIn & Instagram: @ryanscard
    Join the Rookie stars on top PSA registry today:
    1980-1989 Cello Packs - Rookies
  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 1, 2017 9:02AM

    Thank you to everyone so far who has participated. **No one has more than 1 right in their 4 card grades. **
    As I said before, I deem this card very tough to pinpoint where PSA will be grading wise.

    At the end of this I will average the grades compared to the actual grade once I reveal them. I will also share my result as to the card I thought deserves a review to see if I was right.

    Please continue to post your grade assessments.

  • Options
    NowPanicNowPanic Posts: 128 ✭✭

    All 8's

  • Options
    initialDinitialD Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭

    8
    9PD
    7PD
    9

  • Options
    Dand522612Dand522612 Posts: 417 ✭✭✭

    9
    9PD
    7
    8

  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,720 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 1, 2017 3:11PM

    6
    7
    9pd
    7

  • Options
    jordangretzkyfanjordangretzkyfan Posts: 2,665 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All 8pd, but #1 has a shot at a straight 8 if not for the slight discoloration on the top boarder.

  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 1, 2017 8:01PM

    Results are in.

    Average Guess (PD used 2 grades lower so I posted the lower grades with and without PD)
    1. PSA 8
    2. 6 or 8PD
    3. 7 or 9PD
    4. 7 or 9PD

    Actual Grade
    1. PSA 6
    2. 6
    3. 9PD
    4. 7

    For the most part the forum averaged the correct grade collectively, except with card 1, which is the card I thought should have graded higher. Everyone scored that high so it isn't just a me thing.

  • Options
    LarkinCollectorLarkinCollector Posts: 8,975 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like spotting in the black background.

  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭✭

    @Bharris said:
    Where is the PD on the #3 card ?

    @LarkinCollector said:
    Looks like spotting in the black background.

    Yea its very minute in the black background of magic and bird. Most of the time the PD is black on the white, but I got snowed I suppose on the black. You would be somewhat surprised the card originally graded a 6 (I didnt ask for qualifiers), I asked for a grader review and they gave me a 8PD. I sent in for a review and got a 9PD so it moved quite a bit from original grade depending on how you view the qualifier. I think I could get no PD 8 if submitted raw but don't have plans to.

  • Options
    handymanhandyman Posts: 5,720 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2, 2017 6:56PM

    I did not realize I could click and zoom in on the cards until my second guess. #1 card i said at first an 8. But then after seeing it in a bigger image i then said 6. Top left boarder/corner(about 1 cm long starting at the corner) looked dinged on the edge to me. Lifted, dented, or stained

  • Options
    Dand522612Dand522612 Posts: 417 ✭✭✭

    I think the conclusion is this card is real tough to grade and legit hard in high end 9. No wonder the 10 sells for the price of a car. Centering, print line, print blotches in the Magic panel and black specks on some others. This makes everything a little subjective compared to a chrome right out of the pack instant 10. Additionally the qualifier or non qualifier really can fluctuate the final grade.

  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 3, 2017 5:47PM

    @handyman said:
    I did not realize I could click and zoom in on the cards until my second guess. #1 card i said at first an 8. But then after seeing it in a bigger image i then said 6. Top left boarder/corner(about 1 cm long starting at the corner) looked dinged on the edge to me. Lifted, dented, or stained

    I don't think the corner/edge is lifted, but for some reason it got a 6. I've really scanned this card over a few hundred times though and it boggles me. I think that #1 PSA 6 is in the wrong holder, but I will have to check for that mark you've mentioned. It looks pretty darn good for a 6 regardless. I thought I had an 8 for sure on that one.

    @Dand522612 said:
    I think the conclusion is this card is real tough to grade and legit hard in high end 9. No wonder the 10 sells for the price of a car. Centering, print line, print blotches in the Magic panel and black specks on some others. This makes everything a little subjective compared to a chrome right out of the pack instant 10. Additionally the qualifier or non qualifier really can fluctuate the final grade.

    I couldn't agree more. That is why I thought it would be a fun challenge. I may do it again sometime with a few others.

  • Options
    DragnetDragnet Posts: 645 ✭✭✭

    How about this one?

  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭✭

    That has to be an 8 or better or I've been fooled. I am going to go 8.5 and should be reviewed for 9.

  • Options
    Tecmo BoilTecmo Boil Posts: 259 ✭✭✭

    @Dragnet said:
    How about this one?

    I guess 8.5.

    What is it? :)

  • Options
    originalisbestoriginalisbest Posts: 5,971 ✭✭✭✭

    I would have a nightmare grading these particular cards, that much I can say. OTOH, if I wanted one, it seems like you might be able to get a very sharp 6 or 7 that has the most minor-appearing of flaws.

  • Options
    Tecmo BoilTecmo Boil Posts: 259 ✭✭✭

    Along the same lines... can anyone figure out what dropped this all the way to a 5?

    1980-81 Topps MAGIC JOHNSON Rookie PSA 5 https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https://www.ebay.com/ulk/itm/112743820734

  • Options
    KendallCatKendallCat Posts: 3,170 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Left edge middle of the card.

  • Options
    Tecmo BoilTecmo Boil Posts: 259 ✭✭✭

    Ah ha. Good eye. Some kind of edge dent...rubber band maybe.

  • Options
    secretstashsecretstash Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭✭
    edited January 16, 2018 8:28PM

    Not ignoring the edge damage, I think the back is potentially rougher than it appears also. The perforations to me do not look right and the back area was rubbed on the perforations. I also see potential fingernail imprints on the back, but I think everything combined left a nice looking 5 on the front side.

Sign In or Register to comment.