Options
I don't collect Morgan's but I came across some nice ones new pics added
wrighty
Posts: 840 ✭✭✭✭
I know it impossible to grade from pictures especially my quick bad pictures but these coins are blast white with minimal to no hits in the fields. Streaking across the face is from the plastic slide in the album not on the coin.Thoughts?
1
Comments
Wow . . .
I would say there is potential there. As you say . . . . if that streaking across the focal area is not a matter of hairlines . . . .hmmmmmm . . . . nice coin !!!
Drunner
...carefully take her out for us and shoot some naked pictures ...65ish through the scratched looking-glass, but maybe more when she is free
65+
Shot out of the album. There are about 10 different ones that look like this, all common dates but sharp. Having issues uploading more than 1 picture.
GEM, for sure- IMHO.
Wow....and double wow.... Very nice Morgan...Just where did you 'come across' these coins?? Really nice and likely well worth slabbing. Cheers, RickO
That's a clean 85-O for sure. Very nice!
Wow....and double wow.... Very nice Morgan...Just where did you 'come across' these coins?? Really nice and likely well worth slabbing. Cheers, RickO
RickO I was going through a large box of mostly lower grade Morgan's for a friend looking for varieties and this album was in the bottom of the box with those higher end coins in it. With the clean fields and no contact marks they really stood out even though they are common dates and none of them are PL.
Beauty!
My YouTube Channel
Nice find...someone had a good eye. Nothing wrong with gem common dates.
CC
Not as nice as the 85-o imho but this is the 1886 and 81-s sorry for the poor pictures
.
That 1881 looks cleaned.
1885, MS66, 1886, MS63, 1881, Junk.