The new PCGS labeless slab??
Coinstartled
Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭
Coinstartled
Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭
Coinstartled
Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
No labes? Oh My, LOLOL
Those are Whitman holders, no?
Deceptive auction title....Should have been pulled.... Cheers, RickO
All this time I had one and didn't know?
I agree!!
I think there was a 1928 in that lot.
Blurry pictures can make a 3 look like an 8 on them
I know but check the middle one on the top.
You can actually still report the sale to eBay. I don't know if it does any good, but I'd have to think that if the seller pulls something like this in the future, having previous auctions reported for this practice will cause larger red flags to fly. On the other hand, the seller netted about $20.50 each on these, which is junk box money, so his scheme failed.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Third one on the top looks like a 28.
There's no "mirror 3" variety is there?
I seem to see a break in the digit. Think it is a 3.
...In Hand???
Nope....on my 14 year old NEC 15" monitor.
I may be wrong but suspect it is a 3.
I'm looking on a 27 inch. that's about three years old.
Thanks for posting this
Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko
Bad transactions with : nobody to date
On a newer larger screen now. It does look like a 28.