Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Deleted

JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited October 2, 2017 3:38PM in U.S. Coin Forum

.

Comments

  • Options
    CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sure, if it dosnt show signs of being cleaned. I cant tell from the photo. I think any key date coin is worthy of a slab and authentication.

  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,747 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 13, 2017 10:37AM

    I would get this in a slab, even if just for authentication. The nick in the field doesn't bother me much in the context of a low MS coin.

    Edit: Piggyback onto someone else's submission if you only have the one coin, if possible, or shipping and handling will make for an expensive submission.

  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks circulated to me. In that condition, it is worth as much raw and save the fees.

  • Options
    mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 7,017 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If that's mint luster we're seeing,i would get it authenticated/graded.

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • Options
    cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,044 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Always a good idea to get those graded/authenticated if there's room for the submission fees. Lots of 'S' mint coins with the 'S' removed floating around out there.

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • Options
    gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks about MS 62.Not sure if it's worth the sub.

  • Options
    TonerGuyTonerGuy Posts: 590 ✭✭✭

    Its worth the cert. its a key date. I dont see any rub. Looks MS to me. With the hits on the neck I would say its MS62 maybe 62+ long shot 63.

  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,100 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is a little difficult to assess the surfaces from the photos, looks MS to me. I don't think 63 is out of the realm of possibility. Have you verified which of the 4 die pairs it was struck from? Check here.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2, 2017 4:01PM

    .

  • Options
    dbtunrdbtunr Posts: 614 ✭✭✭

    for the cost of $30 grade, you get a coin worth between $300 and $700

  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,100 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Jimnight said:
    To be honest with you I have no idea what you mean by 4 die pairs it was struck from

    In 1928, the Philadelphia mint only struck coins from four separate die pairs. You can use the identifying characteristics of the die (aka die markers) to authenticate your coin. For example, the 1928 that I own was struck from die pair #3 (VAM 3) and is confirmed by the small die scratch in the hair and a slightly doubled R.
    Since there were only 4 obverse dies used it's fairly straight forward to confirm that this isn't a 1928-S with the S removed, it must posses the known characteristics of one of the four dies. Check out the link in my previous post.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    abcde12345abcde12345 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All 1928 peace silver deserves to be graded! The only single exception is a coin that has been super cleaned/whizzed or one that has been altered from a 1923.

  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice coin, nicer that many I've seen in that date.

  • Options
    UMCaneUMCane Posts: 213 ✭✭✭

    Yes, if is not a MS coin, it's pretty darn close. Look at it this way, its almost 100 years old, and what is the future of coins (or currency) in the 21st century? ...If that does not move you, it's a coin minted based on it's intrinsic metal content.

    "Just because you were born on 3rd base doesn't mean you hit a triple"

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2, 2017 4:02PM

    .

  • Options
    Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There is no chance that coin is uncirculated. Are you all clicking on the image to make it larger?

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2, 2017 4:02PM

    .

  • Options
    crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,214 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 13, 2017 6:09PM

    Lots of hits does not equal anything more than a lot of hits. Rub is a completely different issue. I can't say I see any rub. It could be a very low ms grade without being AU or less. I think it has more of a chance being cleaned than AU or less grade. It's worth a shot. Just my opinion, of course :)

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,100 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Wabbit2313 said:
    There is no chance that coin is uncirculated. Are you all clicking on the image to make it larger?

    Actually, no I wasn't... Still looks MS although low, might be a chance it is AU, difficult to tell from pictures really. Take a look at some of the 62's out there, some look a lot like this.

    @Jimnight said:

    Thank you for educating me to the die pairs, it took me a while to figure out where to look using a 20x stereo but there it was #3.

    No problem, it's what we are all here for. Glad you were able to confirm it! Do you have any more pictures, maybe with a different light?

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,217 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is EXACTLY the kind of coin that should be encapsulated on an economy submission. Once graded all the debate goes by the wayside if you or your heirs ever want to sell it. Without encapsulation it will always be a guessing game.

    Gather 4 additional coins together and send them in.

    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2, 2017 4:03PM

    .

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2, 2017 4:03PM

    .

  • Options
    3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Jimnight said:
    Sorry about these pictures they suck

    ...well the 2nd set of pictures still suck but at least they suck with luster...cause it's there now ;)

  • Options
    robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭

    MS62, yes I'd grade it. I'd dip it first, but that's just me.

  • Options
    abcde12345abcde12345 Posts: 3,404 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fully strike hair detail makes this one a keeper (in a retro holder please!).

  • Options
    SoCalBigMarkSoCalBigMark Posts: 2,845 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see it as an au58 and unless graded that is what most dealers would offer you for it.

  • Options
    InditonkaInditonka Posts: 440 ✭✭✭

    I'd slab it, think it would straight grade at 61/62.

  • Options
    mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks MS to me, 62 or so.
    Technically probably a 55+/58 but those coins are now 62.
    So it's a 62.

  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely have it graded.... I would say a 62... could even creep into 63.... Please let us know when you get the grade.... Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    SurfinxHISurfinxHI Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU 58 to ms 62......

    Dead people tell interesting tales.
  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 24,466 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU58 here

  • Options
    fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll go AU55.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file