Is this Picture a little better onToned Morgans?
Smittys
Posts: 9,876 ✭✭✭✭✭
Smittys
Posts: 9,876 ✭✭✭✭✭
Smittys
Posts: 9,876 ✭✭✭✭✭
Comments
Oh, yeah! That picture is a lot better. I like the tone on it.
Much better. That is an attractive coin.
Either your pics are making the coin look baked, or the coin is baked.
Your old photo made me not want the coin. Now with your new pictures I do.
Nice toning
yes,
eBay ID-bruceshort978
Successful BST:here and ATS, bumanchu, wdrob, hashtag, KeeNoooo, mikej61, Yonico, Meltdown, BAJJERFAN, Excaliber, lordmarcovan, cucamongacoin, robkool, bradyc, tonedcointrader, mumu, Windycity, astrotrain, tizofthe, overdate, rwyarmch, mkman123, Timbuk3,GBurger717, airplanenut, coinkid855 ,illini420, michaeldixon, Weiss, Morpheus, Deepcoin, Collectorcoins, AUandAG, D.Schwager.
Much better, these pictures show the luster.
Collector, occasional seller
I agree these pictures are much better. I have no idea where the scratches in the other picture went but this looks like a 63, maybe 64. The toning is a small plus (except for the finger print on the reverse which looks much more obvious now).
My YouTube Channel
Uneven heat? Not for me.
Better quality image, but the pattern and range of color are still not enough to impress me as a toned dollar collector. I prefer the vivid bands or arcs of ROYGBIV.
"Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
http://www.american-legacy-coins.com
This one looks better. It's a different coin than the one you posted previously.