Home U.S. Coin Forum

1783 (or 1791?) Washington Cent in Gold

MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,419 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited December 3, 2016 2:13PM in U.S. Coin Forum

For some crazy reason I pulled this off the shelf today and accidentally found this quote within a minute. Does anyone here know anything more about this coin?


Andy Lustig

Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.

Comments

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is the first I have heard of a cent struck in gold.....must be more of a medal than a coin since the gold value (unless it was very, very tiny - such a size would be like a flake of gold dust) would far exceed a cent. Cheers, RickO

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,778 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Did you ask the SMithsonian if they had one?

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • CoinRaritiesOnlineCoinRaritiesOnline Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭✭

    The regular 1783 Washington Draped Bust Restrike frequently seen in copper and silver does exist in gold, though one hasn't traded publicly anytime in recent memory. I know Anton offered one and TT bought it. Presumably it sold to Larry Stack and later to Syd when that collection was sold.

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 3, 2016 3:40PM

    W. Carew Hazlitt wrote:
    The cents of Washington are fairly numerous, but those of 1783 and 1791 are the best known. The former has been re-struck from the original dies still in existence; a proof gold is advertised in a recent continental auction catalogue. Those of 1791 cost £2 or £3.

    From the quote, it seems like the proof gold is a restrike. Is this a correct reading?

    Do we know who did the restrikes?

    Do we know where the original dies are?

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,419 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 3, 2016 4:14PM

    @Zoins said:

    W. Carew Hazlitt wrote:
    The cents of Washington are fairly numerous, but those of 1783 and 1791 are the best known. The former has been re-struck from the original dies still in existence; a proof gold is advertised in a recent continental auction catalogue. Those of 1791 cost £2 or £3.

    From the quote, it seems like the proof gold is a restrike. Is this a correct reading?

    It would seem so, but it's not completely clear. Adding to my confusion is that Breen 1209 is an "unverified" 1791 in gold that he says was mentioned in the Elder Monthly in April, 1907. That could easily have been the coin that Hazlitt mentioned in 1905 as having turned up in a European auction.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So, the gold cent was just a novelty item? And we do not know where it (they) may be today? Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file