coins like that often don't photograph too well, I find you need to rotate them around in a bright light source to get the luster reflecting through the toning. I bet that looks great in sunlight!
With your taste in coins, especially walkers, I have know doubt that if you kept it, it's gorgeous. This is something I know as fact. My boy, Jeremy, has superb taste in coins.
The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
I just got this back from PCGS. It will get sent down to crazyhounddog for high quality imaging.
PCGS said it is a 65, which is 1 point better than the ICG holder I cracked it out of. I thought it looked like a good 65 candidate. It does look a good bit better than my photos.
I think it looks original, but given the type of toning it has I would imagine that many folks might not like it all that much. However, I think it quite handsome.
Walker Proof Digital Album Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
I like it. I like streaky toning though, and I know that might sound a bit strange, but I do like the streaky ones, copper especially.
If the reverse was streaky too I'd love it.
I think it looks very original. The original 1947 Mint set I have the Walkers are toned the same with, what I call, a pinkish brown color. I had never thought of them as being "streaky" but after reading this thread I realize they are.
Fall National Battlefield Coin Show is September 11-12, 2025 at the Eisenhower Hotel Ballroom, Gettysburg, PA. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
Comments
Not doing much for me, sorry. Glad you like it though.
Strike shows some typical softness.
Fields look very smooth.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Don't like it as much as some others you've posted but still a nice coin.
Strike shows some typical softness.
Fields look very smooth.
If it was a 37 philly probably I woulda passed, figuring a 37-S is not easy to find with any color.
Andrew Blinkiewicz-Heritage
It does appear to be original.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I just got this back from PCGS. It will get sent down to crazyhounddog for high quality imaging.
PCGS said it is a 65, which is 1 point better than the ICG holder I cracked it out of. I thought it looked like a good 65 candidate. It does look a good bit better than my photos.
I think it looks original, but given the type of toning it has I would imagine that many folks might not like it all that much. However, I think it quite handsome.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
I like your sigline
Nice Walker !
Not bad. I kinda like the look.
Mike
FWIW 37-S's can come with nice toning.
mark
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
I like it. I like streaky toning though, and I know that might sound a bit strange, but I do like the streaky ones, copper especially.
If the reverse was streaky too I'd love it.
Yes, I agree. Quite a few 37-S I have seen have an "autumn leaves/sunset" kind of color.
I think it looks very original. The original 1947 Mint set I have the Walkers are toned the same with, what I call, a pinkish brown color. I had never thought of them as being "streaky" but after reading this thread I realize they are.
I have one like that, at least I think this is the gist. An MS66 I bought raw.

It's different, for sure. I think it's the kind of coin/toning that might "grow" on you after a while though. The main thing is that you like it.
- Jim