Home U.S. Coin Forum

New purchase, raw '78 8tf Morgan

FadeToBlackFadeToBlack Posts: 7,847 ✭✭✭✭✭
Paid $100. VAM 14.1A best I can figure.



6500x3250 image





image

Comments

  • 3keepSECRETif2rDEAD3keepSECRETif2rDEAD Posts: 4,285 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very Cool! Obverse looks 58 but with a new reverse...I say AU58+ and nice coin man image
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks as if it may have been a belt buckle coin for a while... clean reverse with wear on obverse... Cheers, RickO
  • This content has been removed.
  • KccoinKccoin Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow sweet coin! Love the overall look
  • logger7logger7 Posts: 9,260 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: FadeToBlack

    That's not wear on the obverse, just rubbed off toning. Has full, unimpeded luster with no hairlines. I'd call it a really nice 64.




    Coin has problems; if I were you I would be feeling very nervous now like you've been had. Just to be a nice guy will offer you $110 for the coin delivered to get you out of your pain....just kidding, lol.
  • This content has been removed.
  • jtlee321jtlee321 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice looking Morgan FTB. I think it might be an EDS VAM-12 without the die cracks on the obverse though. The doubling on the reverse matches and from what I can tell, the eye on Liberty looks like it would match the obverse of the 12.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Wolf359Wolf359 Posts: 7,665 ✭✭✭
    Yes, 14.1A confirmed.

    14.1A is a die variety that grades very well. If the coin is fully original I can see 65.
  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,992 ✭✭✭✭✭
    now you know I love Morgans, but all I see with yours is the dreaded fingerprints.



    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • CascadeChrisCascadeChris Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice 8! Yes, 14.1a clashed. The neck clash is hiding in your pic though. The tuffy (understatement) is to find an unclashed 14.1. Every a1k reverse I see I automatically check for clashing first as a reflex and go from there as the 14.1a is so common that when you see the a1k that's most likely what it is. I recently got to see a friend's unclashed 14.1. He just plopped it in front of me like "no big deal." But he has a habit of doing that like the 78p vam 44 he casually put in front of me. My jaw now drops before I even pick up a coin he "casually" sets in front of me image
    The more you VAM..
  • logger7logger7 Posts: 9,260 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Coin show pick-up?
  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭
    58 for me.
  • oldstandardoldstandard Posts: 387 ✭✭✭
    if it has the luster you say I would go 64 but picture makes it look 58
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm at 58 or 63. I really can't tell on the obverse high points what I'm seeing.



    Originally posted by: CascadeChris

    Every a1k reverse I see I automatically check for clashing first as a reflex and go from there as the 14.1a is so common that when you see the a1k that's most likely what it is. I recently got to see a friend's unclashed 14.1. He just plopped it in front of me like "no big deal."


    I always check those for being unclashed as well. Still haven't found a second one. image
  • jtlee321jtlee321 Posts: 2,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I stand corrected.. Which is why I am still a student. LOL
  • CMCARTCMCART Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭
    Nice coin ??????
    Abraham Lincoln (February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865)
    5$ bills are WOW with the numbers - wanted:
    02121809
    04151865
    Wanted - Flipper notes with the numbers 6-9 or 0-6-9 ON 1$ 2$ 5$ 10$ 20$
    Wanted - 10$ Sereis 2013 - fancy Serial Numbers
  • jerseycat101jerseycat101 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's a great coin. I see no wear at all. I'm in the 64 camp. Love the originality.
  • CacoinguyCacoinguy Posts: 279 ✭✭✭
    Def. MINT STATE - IM IN THE 63 CAMP
  • edited October 28, 2016 6:43AM
    This content has been removed.
  • coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,501 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 27, 2016 9:32AM

    @jtlee321 said:
    Nice looking Morgan FTB. I think it might be an EDS VAM-12 without the die cracks on the obverse though. The doubling on the reverse matches and from what I can tell, the eye on Liberty looks like it would match the obverse of the 12.

    The A1k reverse with die clashes identifies it as VAM 14.1A., and I see I'm late to the thread.

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.american-legacy-coins.com

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 24,072 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it.

  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 27, 2016 9:35AM

    @messydesk said:

    " I recently got to see a friend's unclashed 14.1. He just plopped it in front of me like "no big deal."

    wowaweewa.
    .

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • AMRCAMRC Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭✭✭

    14.1 are always a great find!

    MLAeBayNumismatics: "The greatest hobby in the world!"
  • coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,501 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 27, 2016 11:08AM

    @AMRC said:
    14.1 are always a great find!

    An un-clashed 1878 8TF VAM 14.1 find would be would be a major discovery. It seems odd to me that there have been few examples found, counterintuitive to the possibility that several sets of obverse/reverse dies would have been employed in striking these, and the odds of all sets of dies having clashed in use are highly unlikely. No one has ever proposed that all 14.1's were made from only 1 pair of dies that eventually clashed, and I'm not the one to push that theory.

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.american-legacy-coins.com

  • AMRCAMRC Posts: 4,280 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coindeuce said:

    @AMRC said:
    14.1 are always a great find!

    An un-clashed 1878 8TF VAM 14.1 find would be would be a major discovery. It seems odd to me that there have been few examples found, counterintuitive to the possibility that several sets of obverse/reverse dies would have been employed in striking these, and the odds of all sets of dies having clashed in use are highly unlikely. No one has ever proposed that all 14.1's were made from only 1 pair of dies that eventually clashed, and I'm not the one to push that theory.

    Makes me wonder if the clash was created when they were calibrating the strike on the initial dies?

    MLAeBayNumismatics: "The greatest hobby in the world!"

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file