Home U.S. Coin Forum

Strike Doubling is restricted for any premium! Why?

joeykoinsjoeykoins Posts: 17,547 ✭✭✭✭✭
Hi guy's, We are constantly bombarded with threads about the dreaded "Strike doubling". So, in saying that I always wondered Why? Why shouldn't this misfit of coins get any respect as other defects, true doubling or error coins do? Isn't this still a mistake made by the Mint, capable of receiving some sort of addition in the error/variety family? Just wondering? Thanks in advance.-joeyimage

"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!

--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.

Comments

  • WildIdeaWildIdea Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Because it's not linked to any one set of dies.
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Always figured it had more to do human error that mechanical error.
  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    .

    had to think about it but for me it is usually ugly and i can find beauty in most things.



    it is at the minor end of the spectrum of striking errors.



    o/c, brockage, d/s, clips, cuds etc are simply tastier to me.



    all i got. image

    .

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • howardshowards Posts: 1,241 ✭✭✭
    Because it's common.



    Because it's an unavoidable side effect of the way coins are manufactured, and therefore of little interest.
  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It is an error but a minor one which is extremely common and almost all have no premium.

    A few extreme examples seem to carry a premium.
  • DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Because it is not on the die and is created at striking.

    I do have a set of these going for the Mercury Dimes.......for fun only.
  • goodmoney4badmoneygoodmoney4badmoney Posts: 1,298 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If it were up to me I would value almost all doubled dies as pretty much equally worthless, except for special examples such as the 1955, but I also think the 1955 is extremely overpriced. I say this because even though strike doubling is much more common, they both look very very similar as a finished product. My 2C opinion speaking as an error (but not variety) collector.

  • 19Lyds19Lyds Posts: 26,492 ✭✭✭✭
    IMO, if the Strike Doubling is unique enough, or bold enough, then somebodies gonna pay a premium for it.



    I was offered a premium for this 1967 Kennedy SMS Coin:



    image
    I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.



    The name is LEE!
  • joeykoinsjoeykoins Posts: 17,547 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yep, that certainly is one pretty strike doubling!image

    "Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!

    --- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I really enjoy radical (true) doubling.. but strike (or machine) doubling is usually minor (as is some true DD). If I need magnification to see it, then I lose interest. Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file