Home U.S. Coin Forum

Toned Fractional Gold

jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
I just picked this up today. It is graded MS63 with PCGS. Hints of pinks, purples, and blues. I love it! Thoughts?
image
image
image
image

Comments

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,860 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Can we see the reverse? Agree that it's a very attractive coin.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,406 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Obverse looks nice
  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,638 ✭✭✭✭✭
    i like it
  • jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The reverse doesn't have any toning
    image
  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,056 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I dig it. I'm a fan of fractionals. OGH?
  • jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: SeattleSlammer
    I dig it. I'm a fan of fractionals. OGH?


    This is my first fractional. I am a fan of toned gold, which is the main reason I bought it. It has a proof like look. Is that normal with these?
    image
    image
  • jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I just checked the cert number out on pcgs website, and it shows a sales history in 2004 going for more than I paid. All recent sales on coin facts for the grade went for less though. Mine is toned though, so I am happy.
    Link
  • jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    A winner image
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,056 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, PL qualities aren't uncommon with these. Your example looks very nice, no obvious distractions. Despite their tiny size, many are mushy in strike, off center, and/or with significant hairlining, scratches, nicks, foggy haze, uneven luster, or just general blah-ness. But you got a good one. image
  • jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: SeattleSlammer
    Yes, PL qualities aren't uncommon with these. Your example looks very nice, no obvious distractions. Despite their tiny size, many are mushy in strike, off center, and/or with significant hairlining, scratches, nicks, foggy haze, uneven luster, or just general blah-ness. But you got a good one. image


    As you can tell from the reverse pic, there is almost a bend look to it. Is that from minting since they are so thin?
  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,056 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: jwitten
    Originally posted by: SeattleSlammer
    Yes, PL qualities aren't uncommon with these. Your example looks very nice, no obvious distractions. Despite their tiny size, many are mushy in strike, off center, and/or with significant hairlining, scratches, nicks, foggy haze, uneven luster, or just general blah-ness. But you got a good one. image


    As you can tell from the reverse pic, there is almost a bend look to it. Is that from minting since they are so thin?




    Yes. In many cases the production methods were quite crude in comparison to the mint. Plus just the tiny size contributed to more errors.
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,888 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice.



    I like your avatar Indian, too.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: lordmarcovan
    Nice.

    I like your avatar Indian, too.


    Thank you! It is my favorite toned coin I own.
    image
  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Both are super.
  • JazzmanJABJazzmanJAB Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭✭
    Both are Very Nice !
  • EastonCollectionEastonCollection Posts: 1,536 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Its not usually to see an attractively toned calfracs. If its a period 2 then many are prooflike whereas period 1s are scarcer if prooflike. Your BG-222 is not very rare and its one of the most common calfracs period 1s. I like the coin and its toning. Because calfracs have a good percentage of copper in it you'll see that toning. Nice coin.
    Easton Collection
  • MarkMark Posts: 3,580 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I think your clafrac is definitely worth what you paid for it. It's a very nice looking coin.



    Did you see this coin in hand or have someone else look at it for you? I ask because even when I enlarge the Heritage picture, I can't see the really nice toning that's on the coin. Based on the Heritage picture, I'd never have guessed the coin looks as sweet as it does.
    Mark


  • jwittenjwitten Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: Mark
    I think your clafrac is definitely worth what you paid for it. It's a very nice looking coin.

    Did you see this coin in hand or have someone else look at it for you? I ask because even when I enlarge the Heritage picture, I can't see the really nice toning that's on the coin. Based on the Heritage picture, I'd never have guessed the coin looks as sweet as it does.


    Toned gold shows best at certain angles. The seller showed the toning, so I took a chance.
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,765 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Definitely a winner! image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file