Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Interesting Graded Coin from 1985 - Authentigrade

ianrussellianrussell Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
Had not seen this before. Has a big serial number, wonder if they really produced 200,000+ of them?

image

image
Ian Russell
Owner/Founder GreatCollections
GreatCollections Coin Auctions - Certified Coin Auctions Every Week - Rare Coins & Coin Values

Comments

  • DollarAfterDollarDollarAfterDollar Posts: 3,215 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Might even be better, eh?
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    I have to admit, I like the coin and MS63 looks very reasonable if not conservative.



    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • joebb21joebb21 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭✭✭
    looks like a 1985 ms63 and a 2016 ms64 and in need of a dip
    may the fonz be with you...always...
  • astroratastrorat Posts: 9,221 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Very nice ... that's only the second one I have seen.

    I have a similar slab (without the coin) for a Liberty Double Eagle. It's serial number is 230095 and was dated about a month earlier.

    Perhaps the company started with serial number 230001?

    imageimage
    Numismatist Ordinaire
    See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,673 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks undergraded by today's standards. Looks very solid by the standards of its day.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • CoinRaritiesOnlineCoinRaritiesOnline Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭✭
    Is this slab type in Michael Schmidt's book?
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: CoinRaritiesOnline
    Is this slab type in Michael Schmidt's book?


    Good question. I don't remember where I put Condor101's book, but I don't recall seeing this slab. Of course the book had about a million different slab types so I may be wrong.


    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,852 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't know about the slab, but the coin looks quite nice. image
  • bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    With the gunk at the rims, I think 63 was appropriate. First of it's kind I have seen.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I saw one of these at a coin show in Seattle in the early 2000's... might have been the Boeing coin show... Nice St. Gaudens... Cheers, RickO
  • BStrauss3BStrauss3 Posts: 3,680 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's not in Conder's book.

    When you buy one of those sequential numbering stamps, you can specify the first number.

    Years ago I opened a checking account and they asked me what # I wanted to start my checks with. I didn't want it to look like a new account, so I chose 2354 or something like that.
    -----Burton
    ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file