1917 Buffalo PDS Set - Guess the CAC coins
Options
MFH
Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭
I submitted my 1917 MS 64 PDS Set of Buffalos to CAC.
I also threw in some AU 58's...but that's another
story !!
Can you guess which one(s) CAC ??
Images by Valente151
1917 Philadelphia - MS 64

1917 Denver - MS 64

1917 San Francisco - MS 64

Thanks for looking !!
I also threw in some AU 58's...but that's another
story !!
Can you guess which one(s) CAC ??
Images by Valente151
1917 Philadelphia - MS 64

1917 Denver - MS 64

1917 San Francisco - MS 64

Thanks for looking !!
0
Comments
-
I guess the philly and the denver.MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.0
-
I'll guess the San Francisco coin.0
-
I'll go with the Denver and San Francisco issues, something about the Philly seems off to me.
Andrew Blinkiewicz-Heritage
0 -
None.0
-
I agree with Ablinky. Denver and San Francisco. Too many marks on Phil.Joe
Everything is all right!0 -
This content has been removed.
-
Originally posted by: donzme
I'll guess the San Francisco coin.
thisRegistry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com0 -
I thought all three before I looked. lol0
-
S is the horniest.0
-
P and S stickered. The spots on the S-mint Indian could be a factor for CAC though.0
-
I think the San Francisco.Member ANS, ANA, GSNA, TNC
0 -
Originally posted by: Ablinky
I'll go with the Denver and San Francisco issues, something about the Philly seems off to me.
+1 on the D & S.
HH
Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set:
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!0 -
D and S0
-
Spotting aside, that S mint sure has a hammered strike in comparison to its P and D brethren. So I'll guess the San Fran example.0
-
Originally posted by: AUandAGOriginally posted by: donzme
I'll guess the San Francisco coin.
this
0 -
I love that 17S regardless of what CAC thought, so that's my vote, I'm on the fence on the D- mint coin.
Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug0 -
-
I'll say all of them. I'm not a big fan of "fly specs", or spots, like on the 17-s but it will not hurt the grade. I believe they all made the cut, or should have. All very nice Buffs!!!!
The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.0 -
The D and S coins.0
-
The S Buff.... Cheers, RickO0
-
Not the P, probably the D, certainly the S (or at least it should be).
Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
0 -
S for certain, maybe the P.Vern
l
It's not having what you want, it's wanting what you've got.0 -
Originally posted by: kookoox10
Spotting aside, that S mint sure has a hammered strike in comparison to its P and D brethren. So I'll guess the San Fran example.
This.
0 -
To this day I still do not fully understand the CAC sticker. If the sticker represents an accurate grade, I think the arguement can be made for all. If the sticker is meant to reflect being stong for the grade, reasonable people could find things to pick on about all three.Liberty Nickel Digital Album
Buffalo Nickel Digital Album
Toned Buffalo Date SetDigital Album
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/mysetregistry/album/411385 7070 Registry<0 -
They all look of equal quality to me.
I see no reason for any of them not to sticker.Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
0 -
Originally posted by: ms70
None.
Two members got it completely wrong, by guessing "None".
MS70 & Realone.
Andy "Blinky" was the first one who guessed correctly.
The Denver and the San Francisco issues passed with
Green Stickers.
My Phila issue that I submitted in an AU 58 holder, also
passed. Can't understand why the 64 did not pass.
Thanks for guessing - as my friend Vern Sebby says,
"It's just a crap-shoot".... How true.
0 -
Originally posted by: MFH
Can't understand why the 64 did not pass.
It could be as simple as CAC having more desire for solid D and S coin of that year. They might want a MS64 Philly coin to be higher end for the grade to assign a sticker....at least on this particular day.
0 -
Originally posted by: roadrunnerOriginally posted by: MFH
Can't understand why the 64 did not pass.
It could be as simple as CAC having more desire for solid D and S coin of that year. They might want a MS64 Philly coin to be higher end for the grade to assign a sticker....at least on this particular day.
I'm didn't like the large broad hit at the Buffalo's armpit. I'm guessing CAC didn't like it either.Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
0 -
I got here late, but my guess was the S coin only.0
-
S only.All glory is fleeting.0
-
Yikes! Just saw the Morgan Freeman specklies alll over the cheek on the S one.
Changed my mind.
Not gonna even guess. I mean, jeez, .....64?
big deal.0 -
Originally posted by: Shamika
I'm didn't like the large broad hit at the Buffalo's armpit. I'm guessing CAC didn't like it either.
I looked in that region and didn't see a hit of note anywhere on all 3 coins. Aren't the arm/leg pits hidden when the buffalo is straight up on all 4's? Do you mean the left front outer shoulder/upper leg?
0 -
Originally posted by: roadrunnerOriginally posted by: Shamika
I'm didn't like the large broad hit at the Buffalo's armpit. I'm guessing CAC didn't like it either.
I looked in that region and didn't see a hit of note anywhere on all 3 coins. Aren't the arm/leg pits hidden when the buffalo is straight up on all 4's? Do you mean the left front outer shoulder/upper leg?
On the 17-P, if you draw a straight line between the Buffalo's eye and the tip of his tail, just above the armpit you'll see what I mean. It almost looks like part of the design at first but if you compare it to the S and the D, you can't miss it.
Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
0 -
Well.. at least I got one right....
(that is why I did not guess more)... Cheers, RickO 0 -
On the 17-P, if you draw a straight line between the Buffalo's eye and the tip of his tail, just above the armpit you'll see what I mean. It almost looks like part of the design at first but if you compare it to the S and the D, you can't miss it.
Ok. It's fairly subtle imo as it sits under a series of shoulder creases and blends in pretty well. I wouldn't think that mark should be an issue except on 65/66 coins. Would much rather have that contact than the obverse spots on the 17-s. Spot-o-phobia runs pretty wild on the forum at times.
0 -
P and s gold stickeredmay the fonz be with you...always...0
-
Originally posted by: roadrunnerOn the 17-P, if you draw a straight line between the Buffalo's eye and the tip of his tail, just above the armpit you'll see what I mean. It almost looks like part of the design at first but if you compare it to the S and the D, you can't miss it.
Ok. It's fairly subtle imo as it sits under a series of shoulder creases and blends in pretty well. I wouldn't think that mark should be an issue except on 65/66 coins.
Indeed, if you had to accept a coin with such a hit, you couldn't ask for it to be in a better location and orientation. It looks like part of the design and only by comparing against the two other coins is it obvious.
I think 64 is the correct grade. But I'm only proposing a possible reason why it didn't get stickered.
Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
0 -
I'm didn't like the large broad hit at the Buffalo's armpit. I'm guessing CAC didn't like it either.
Wow, I thought that was hit was part of the design at first. While the hit is there, it does not seem distracting to me and would not make it low end IMO.0 -
Originally posted by: AMRC
Don't forget to think about the skin of the coin. CAC is not just about grade, it is about originality as well.
Agreed. The 17-P does not appear to be dipped and if it was, the luster does not appear to be impaired and it is getting a "second skin"0 -
Originally posted by: AMRC
Don't forget to think about the skin of the coin. CAC is not just about grade, it is about originality as well.
It usually is. But, CAC also stickers dipped out MS64/65 bust, seated, and gold coinage as long as the coin is choice on marks with decent eye appeal. One could call this accepting market realities for what are very market acceptable coins. Having original surfaces is not a must, though I'd figure the larger majority of stickered coins have orig surfaces.
0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 520K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.5K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 60 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum













