Home› U.S. Coin Forum

NEW

ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 8,293 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
A:

Comments

  • drwstr123drwstr123 Posts: 7,049 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Worthy of a 'nice strike'.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,295 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No premium
    Early Dollar Set
  • goldengolden Posts: 10,157 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally posted by: tradedollarnut
    No premium


    image
  • SoCalBigMarkSoCalBigMark Posts: 2,808 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Neutral on the color but the luster and surfaces are wonderful, so many of these have problems. Love it!
  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,082 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lovely original PQ example. Many would pay a premium for it. Like 63 money...though the price difference is small. Congrats.
  • CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No premium. I think the toning is a negative. Just looks not right.
  • etexmikeetexmike Posts: 6,852 ✭✭✭
    No premium but I kinda like the look.





    Mike
  • CCDollarCCDollar Posts: 758 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Too bad you can't get a nice gold CAC sticker in the original ANA or pre bar code ANACS slab. Oh well...nice coin.

    CC
    Nickel Triumph...My Led Zepps
  • MICHAELDIXONMICHAELDIXON Posts: 6,653 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Beautiful coin, but I do not think it is worth a premium. UNLESS....you put it on Ebay with ****Monster Rainbow Toned Isabella****
    Thanksgiving National Battlefield Coin Show is November 28 & 29, 2025 at the Eisenhower Hotel Ballroom, Gettysburg, PA. Dealer Tables are available. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
  • jcpingjcping Posts: 2,649 ✭✭✭
    No premium from color but potential premium because grade flation image
    an SLQ and Ike dollars lover
  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,537 ✭✭✭✭✭
    looks better than a 62
  • TopographicOceansTopographicOceans Posts: 6,535 ✭✭✭✭
    It will match the new pink Breast Cancer US Commemorative
  • ACopACop Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe not worth a color premium but interesting color. Like.
  • FlatwoodsFlatwoods Posts: 4,248 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wouldn't pay a premium for the color but it sure looks better than 62.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,073 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I am sorry, but I am not a fan of this coin. I suspect that the true color of this coin has less of an orange hue when you see the coin in person. If the color shown here is true to the actual piece, It's a type of silver toning that I have not seen before. Brownish toning that takes this pattern is often seen on coins that have been dipped and has retoned, either because the dip solution was completely rinsed, or the coin was stored in something other than sulfur free paper.

    I'll put this piece out there as something that has a more natural look. This Isabella Quarter is not worth a premium because of its toning, but it is a naturally toned piece with original, undipped surfaces. PCGS graded this piece MS-64.

    imageimage

    I hope that I have not offended you, but you did ask for honest opinions.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,171 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The coin looks nice for a 62 and appears to have full luster and original surfaces. No premium for color, but certainly worth more than the typical dipped out Isabellas that you see.
    *For Sale on Ebay*
  • metalmeistermetalmeister Posts: 4,605 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks 63 with nice luster
    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • ashelandasheland Posts: 24,072 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like it. image

    My YouTube Channel

  • stevebensteveben Posts: 4,656 ✭✭✭✭✭
    looks better than 62 for sure.
  • stmanstman Posts: 11,352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I usually see opinions from people and it is for the most part no premium is said on all kinds of coins.. But if they're were selling I have to wonder if that would change. Old holder, rainbow PQ L@@K. image
    Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    IMO, the coin is an MS-62 because it has friction wear (loss of original surface and mint luster) on the high points. Compare the high point color on your coin and the other posted coin which has much less "rub."
  • roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,324 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The color is not worth a premium.



    The important point is that the coin looks to be a 63/64. If it's in one of those gold foil reverse hologram holders then I would expect an upgrade. I'd certainly pay a premium to 62 money to get a higher grade...especially in that gold foil holder. If there aren't hairlines on the coin it could go 64.



    On the MS64 coin above I'm not a fan of the reverse wiping/field hairlines at 6 and 11 o'clock. I'd grade the obv 64 but the reverse a 63.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Still looks like steering fluid on this coin to me. Not sure if anyone knows what that looks like. Just not for me.

    Maybe it is power steering fluid. I have never seen all red toning like that.
  • CommemKingCommemKing Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Still would prefer my coin. And I'm not crazy about it!

    image
  • BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hmmmm. Looks like a nicely detailed, lustrous coin, but I see the toning as a slight negative. I'd rather have a white one, or even better, one with a nice patina.
  • NicNic Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If the color has any red its a 64.

    My 1866 Philly Mint Set

  • cheezhedcheezhed Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I suspect the color is what limited the grade to begin with.
    Many happy BST transactions
  • WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 9,897 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I wouldn't pay a premium for it.



    I have no problem with the toning but it is not anything special.



    But I really like the strike and the surfaces.



    It looks better than 62....like maybe a 63 or 64.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...