1957 Proof Jefferson - Large/Small Star

Comments

• CaptHenway Posts: 32,694 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 25, 2016 10:03AM

  Probably just an overpolished die. Notice how the top serif on the 1 is diminished as well.

  Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.

  0
• JRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 25, 2016 11:20AM

  Originally posted by: CaptHenway
  
  Probably just an overpolished die. Notice how the top serif on the 1 is diminished as well.

  
  
  
  
  I concur.
  
  
  
  

  Some coins are just plain "Interesting"

  0
• keyman64 Posts: 15,527 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 25, 2016 11:36AM

  Interesting observation but I too would vote die polishing. I do happen to have a 1957 PR 5c...
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  The MAX size can be seen here, mine does not seem to be the one that is smaller: MAX

  "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
  Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
  

  0
• BigDowgie Posts: 1,779 ✭✭✭✭

  February 25, 2016 11:56AM

  keyman64,
  
  And a beautiful one at that!

  0
• crazyhounddog Posts: 14,055 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 25, 2016 11:58AM

  They look the same to me.

  The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.

  0
• ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

  February 26, 2016 1:21AM

  Definitely different, and die polishing would seem the logical answer...Cheers, RickO

  0