Home U.S. Coin Forum

Dipped & retoned: to grade or not to grade?

rheddenrhedden Posts: 6,632 ✭✭✭✭✭
Here's an observation about the way the grading services look at coins that were dipped long ago, and may or may not have retoned naturally. Assume these coins are free of other problems that would prevent grading; the focus is just on the fact that the coin was dipped at some point.

Take a Proof or Unc. 19th century silver coin, dip it, and assuming the dip does not leave damage to the coin, it usually can be graded. Coins that developed secondary album or envelope toning are as good as those without it.

Take a circ. silver coin (say, below XF), do the same, and it usually won't grade because it doesn't "look natural".

Take a Proof or Unc. Indian cent, do the same, and it's definitely not going to grade, with or without the toning. Questionable color or cleaned, every time like clockwork. I guess the thinking is that the coin could turn brown or develop spots in the holder, and "fake" red cents have never been appreciated, either.


Does this system seem rational, or does it need revision?



Comments

  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree that many EF and higher classic silver coins have been dipped and that they grade routinely as problem-free coins at the TPGs as long as there aren't other glaring issues. In fact, many of these previously dipped coins with secondary (or even tertiary) color sell for a premium because the market values those blue/gold rings on Capped Bust coins and other such patterns. It is also my experience that few VF or lower coins, when dipped, will end up in TPG holders as problem-free. Part of this observation might simply be due to the idea that fewer VF and lower coins were dipped since, if you view the motivation for many old dips like I do, coins that low in grade were particularly difficult to sell as uncirculated after a dip. In my opinion, the copper that gets dipped just typically never returns to an acceptable color, unlike silver, and the TPGs reflect the market preference to call these problem coins.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • BoosibriBoosibri Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    how many times on this forum do you see a member touting their "original" bust half or Seated whatever when in fact it is a dipped and retoned coin which is attractive to some but not original. Point is, most folks know "market acceptable" and probably wouldn't like original if given the choice between the two and TPG reflects this (or perhaps more accurately, causes this).
  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,782 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A coin going bad due to environmental factors, humidity, heat, pvc holder is a risk of rare coin investment everybody knows about. Ultimately many coins will have to be dipped / conserved to maintain marketability.

    In this modern age of TPG's the added question of whether the coin will holder problem free after being dipped is another factor.

    Keep all receipts for Sch D Capital Gains Reporting or if your Report Schedule C. Face the reality that some coins will end up as a loss once liquidated. This is simply the reality of the marketplace especially based on current market conditions.

    I have sent in for grading coins I have dipped (usually due to PVC damage, unattractive toning) and the result was usually positive. I would send in a dipped / retoned coin especially if it was of enough of a material cost nature to justifuy the grading expenses. If it comes back in a details holder you can always liquidate it on ebay starting auction at 99c and many people buy these to crack out and put in their album. But a $20 - $50 World collector coin for my 28 coin bourse tray of collector coins at shows - no.

    The quicker one flips material, the more likelood some of this can be avoided. Financial loss due to investment in rare coins is a risk every investor must face.
    Investor
  • winkywinky Posts: 1,671
    Really needs revision, big time.
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    how many times on this forum do you see a member touting their "original" bust half or Seated whatever when in fact it is a dipped and retoned coin which is attractive to some but not original.

    quite a lot, and your assessment is something I have mentioned many times. maybe the room is starting to fill up.image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file