Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

this dime was also part of the collection.....BUT..???

YQQYQQ Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭✭✭
1his 1837 dime was part of the collection I purchased.
The big question is this:
has the rev been struck or is the rev blank from day 1.
M O is that it has never been struck because there would be at least some ever so minor traces visible.
on this one there is absolutely Nothing visible.
perhaps someone here has more knowledge than I have.
any help is much appreciated.
thank you
image
image
Today is the first day of the rest of my life

Comments

  • Options
    DIMEMANDIMEMAN Posts: 22,403 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have never seen anything like that. With as much detail as there is on the obverse.....there should be something on the reverse.

    Looks like the reverse was shaved off to do a love token...then they changed their mind and left it.

    Who knows???
  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,180 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I suspect shaved off also....perhaps weighing it may give a clue, though you'd also have to factor in heavy wear.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    BryceMBryceM Posts: 11,941 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Sometimes this will happen where one side wears more than the other. PMD is also a possibility. It's very unlikely that it was only struck on one side, as that's contrary to the usual striking process.

    This slightly older dime shows a similar (but not identical) appearance:

    image

    On this one, if you look carefully under the right light you can actually make out quite a bit of the original reverse detail. Try it on yours and see if there's any trace of it.
  • Options
    Jinx86Jinx86 Posts: 3,729 ✭✭✭✭✭
    There are a few letters you can make out in the center.
  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,180 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It's very unlikely that it was only struck on one side, as that's contrary to the usual striking process. >>


    I'd guess the only way it could happen was if two planchets were in the die at the same time.....meaning another coin somewhere would have no obverse detail.
    But I still suspect it was shaved or ground down.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,233 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It may have once been part of a magician's prop. It was probably shaved down to fit inside a small cent.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,077 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Unfinished love token.
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • Options
    FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 6,047 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's been machined on the reverse - not an error coin
    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 24,548 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Unfinished love token. >>



    image
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with the unfinished love token idea..... likely she broke it off and married someone else, so he spent it. image Cheers, RickO
  • Options
    ashelandasheland Posts: 24,548 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    YQQYQQ Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Fred, and all others, thank you for you comments and opinions.

    if the coin has been machined would there not be some kind of mechanical traces?
    and, would the scratches not have been machined off also?
    and the coin would have been in some kind of a vise type grip to hold it for the machining to be done.
    would that not leave some traces?
    also, if machined, why is the rim still there, however, metalflow is evident from the rim toward the center all around. i. e. the groove right at the rim is rounded or filled.
    Fred, why would you suggest the machining ?
    the coin is very old....
    if it was done mechanically, I believe it was done at a very early stage in its life.
    will try UV light on it to see if that makes anything visible.
    Not trying to look for arguments here. But rather for a viable answer.
    it is easy to say: ground down, machined, filed etc.... having a solid explanation for a reason is something else.
    Please fellow do not take this as a criticism as it is only human to react when something is not easy to answer. I usually say : it is a basement job... just because it looks like it IMO.
    all Love tokens I have seen ( am not looking for them) have a completely flat side with NO rim.
    this coin still has a rim.
    Today is the first day of the rest of my life
  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,216 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Could just be excessive wear on the reverse. A weak rim could let everything else wear away because it was not protected. The halves of this era often had weak reverse rims.
    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    TomBTomB Posts: 23,232 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It was absolutely not struck uniface. It has either worn asymmetrically to yield what is an apparently blank reverse or has been planed either by hand or mechanically for (most likely) use in jewelry.
    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • Options
    winkywinky Posts: 1,671 ✭
    filed down.
  • Options
    JJSingletonJJSingleton Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Unfinished love token. >>

    +1

    Joseph J. Singleton - First Superintendent of the U.S. Branch Mint in Dahlonega Georgia

    Findley Ridge Collection
    About Findley Ridge

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file