Washington quarter variety identification question

This is 1953 D, is it D/D/D/S? It doesn't show in the pics much, but there is a third impression west. I didn't see any of the die cracks purportedly associated with these.
Thanks!



Thanks!




<a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.ebay.com/sch/cucamo...?_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc="> MY EBAY
0
Comments
<< <i>That is strike doubling >>
+1
<< <i>I have a dumb question. I agree this looks like strike doubling. But, how do you get strike doubling on the mint mark but not anywhere else? >>
Strike doubling can show up anywhere and be in different places from the strike of one coin to the next.
This coin is pretty busy above the MM but I doubt it's an OMM.
<< <i>I have a dumb question. I agree this looks like strike doubling. But, how do you get strike doubling on the mint mark but not anywhere else? >>
The metal of a mintmark is easily displaced due to it's lack of surface area...
In other words, it's a tiny blob of metal that is easily 'obscured'.
<< <i>I have a dumb question. I agree this looks like strike doubling. But, how do you get strike doubling on the mint mark but not anywhere else? >>
Strike doubling is a funny occurrence and not always easy to explain.
Take a look at the extreme strike doubling seen here
Now look at the rest of the obverse.
Try to explain this one ?????
It is the nature of the type A quarter reverse. The relief of the design is so low that strike doubling of the mintmark can occur without strike doubling on the rest of the coin.
I have seen strike doubling on type B quarter reverses with their sharpened design.
<< <i>Now look at the rest of the obverse.
Try to explain this one ?????
Gremlins !!!
Coin Club Benefit auctions ..... View the Lots
Hoard the keys.