Home U.S. Coin Forum

Washington quarter variety identification question

This is 1953 D, is it D/D/D/S? It doesn't show in the pics much, but there is a third impression west. I didn't see any of the die cracks purportedly associated with these.
Thanks!
image
image
image
image
<a target=new class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://www.ebay.com/sch/cucamo...?_ipg=50&_sop=12&_rdc="> MY EBAY

Comments

  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,192 ✭✭✭✭
    That is strike doubling
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>That is strike doubling >>


    +1

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not D/D/D/S....Cheers, RickO
  • dlmtortsdlmtorts Posts: 743 ✭✭✭
    I have a dumb question. I agree this looks like strike doubling. But, how do you get strike doubling on the mint mark but not anywhere else?
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 28,784 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I have a dumb question. I agree this looks like strike doubling. But, how do you get strike doubling on the mint mark but not anywhere else? >>



    Strike doubling can show up anywhere and be in different places from the strike of one coin to the next.


    This coin is pretty busy above the MM but I doubt it's an OMM.
    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,192 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I have a dumb question. I agree this looks like strike doubling. But, how do you get strike doubling on the mint mark but not anywhere else? >>



    The metal of a mintmark is easily displaced due to it's lack of surface area...

    In other words, it's a tiny blob of metal that is easily 'obscured'. image
    Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I have a dumb question. I agree this looks like strike doubling. But, how do you get strike doubling on the mint mark but not anywhere else? >>



    Strike doubling is a funny occurrence and not always easy to explain.
    Take a look at the extreme strike doubling seen here
    image

    Now look at the rest of the obverse.
    Try to explain this one ?????
    image
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • <<I have a dumb question. I agree this looks like strike doubling. But, how do you get strike doubling on the mint mark but not anywhere else?>>

    It is the nature of the type A quarter reverse. The relief of the design is so low that strike doubling of the mintmark can occur without strike doubling on the rest of the coin.
    I have seen strike doubling on type B quarter reverses with their sharpened design.
  • CoinZipCoinZip Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Now look at the rest of the obverse.
    Try to explain this one ?????
    image >>




    Gremlins !!!

    Coin Club Benefit auctions ..... View the Lots

  • Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yup sorry Mark it's strike doubling you see it in a lot of the 1964-D's,62,63 as well keep on looking a lot of good stuff out there.


    Hoard the keys.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file