For what series is the Greysheet reliable?
What series is the Greysheet reliable?
What series is the Greysheet unreliable?
For those series which the Greysheet is unreliable, are true market values over or under?
Please compare Greysheet to actual market values for problem-free, pleasing examples
What series is the Greysheet unreliable?
For those series which the Greysheet is unreliable, are true market values over or under?
Please compare Greysheet to actual market values for problem-free, pleasing examples
0
Comments
Listed values are waaay under what they really trade for.
I think Morgan bids are actually maybe 5% higher than reality. BU/MS stuff.
Circulated tough date buffalos are probably 25% too high.
amazing how many times i've seen this question during my short tenure. i would say search the archives to find trends but changing bullion prices and millions of auction archives it seems to me "reliable" greysheet pricing is more fluid from year to year, or even month to month.
i recall dealers at shows stating on numerous occasions how much stuff went up or down since the last issue. so asking what is reliable is kind of like asking what never changes as anything else is unreliable and unpredictable?
one could say that there are issues that are reliably up and then down but that sounds too much like manipulation and i'm not going there with this post.
.
While the forum membership numbers in the thousands, the CDN compilers are probably only a few people. There's no way they can keep up with us or anyone else for all the different series we have specialists in. Just like the TPG's could nail grading accuracy to >90% accuracy (at some higher price per submission) so too could the CDN nail pricing accuracy to well above 90%. And what would either gain from doing that other than "good will"? Many top dealers prefer a CDN with numerous holes. The same dealers probably appreciate a little sloppiness in TPG grading too. A completely level grading field and grading guide would make a much less profitable market for those who actively participate in it.
problematic when selling coins in grades that are not listed. Dealers always want to look at the next
lowest grade, which can be a major rip-off for certain coins. Im not sure why grading services would
had out tons of AU55s but the CDN ignores the grade ?
<< <i>Greysheet is useless for VF-XF Capped Bust, Seated, and Barber half dollars.
Listed values are waaay under what they really trade for. >>
Most B&M's like to use grey sheet values for the above coins when BUYING, they forget where they placed the greysheet when a buyer is wanting to buy from them.
NGC registry V-Nickel proof #6!!!!
working on proof shield nickels # 8 with a bullet!!!!
RIP "BEAR"
Most B&M's like to use grey sheet values for the above coins when BUYING, they forget where they placed the greysheet when a buyer is wanting to buy from them.
we buy/sell exclusively from the "Bid" side of the sheet, you are welcome at our shop anytime. my binder is right next to my phone and my boss has his somewhere on his desk when he isn't referencing it.
So when a collector asks if the Greysheet is reliable, one needs to ask the collector, reliable for what? The collector SHOULD base his values for a coin on the retail price guides, NOT the Greysheet. What we all need is a two price guideline for every coin. An average retail AND wholesale price guide so that a RANGE can be projected in the MINDS of both buyer and seller and then an equitable agreement on a trading price can be agreed to. I know it won't happen in my lifetime, but that's the kind of price guide for coins we really need. Steve
My Complete PROOF Lincoln Cent with Major Varieties(1909-2015)Set Registry
Sometimes we agree. Sometimes I challenge them to send their coins to PCGS like I do.
If worse comes to better, its the Heritage archives, or wherever it's necessary to PROVE or disprove. For me, it's a chore proving all the time.
I will say the PRICE GUIDE is unreliable when negotiations occur with widgets, almost 99% of the time.
And very reliable when we come to terms on THE COINs offered, despite the series.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
<< <i>For readily available coins in readily available grades, the CDN is reliable. Everything else is a crap shoot. >>
This.
And that goes for the Seated and Barber coins too - sorry aficionados. Coins like the 93S, 97S, and 05O halves are indeed valued way over
sheet prices, but not so the common coins.
<< <i>I find it pretty much useless for any pre 1940 unc Lincolns. >>
I find it pretty much useless period. Personally I think it's an old school, outdated sort of guide that outlived it's usefulness.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
<< <i>I find it pretty much useless period. Personally I think it's an old school, outdated sort of guide that outlived it's usefulness. >>
A lot of things are useless if you aren't careful.
I showed a better date seated quarter to a 'pseudo specialist' at the Lakeland show last week....he logged into his CCE, then proceeded
to explain to me my price too high, here look at what this similar coin sold for at auction....yes, indeed my price was a little high, but
then again the auction record was from 2002, and when I pointed that out, and asked if he was selling any of his coins using 12 year old
records, he got kinda sheepish.
If the Greysheet was off by 20%, I could justify 'it's just a guide' as an acceptable answer. Some variance is allowed. Inferior examples may be offered for 20% less than Greysheet, typical examples at 100%, and exceptionally nice examples at 120%. Some dealers ask for higher markups than others and some dealers have more invested in their inventory. This is how a guide works and is acceptable.
Once you notice a trend for any given series or date that inferior examples sell for 125% of the guide, normal examples at 200% the guide, and exceptionally nice examples at 300% of the guide, it is no longer a guide. At that point it is just wrong and useless information. You have to draw the line somewhere.
Sure, one or two dealers may be overpriced, but when you start noticing a trend, you know something is wrong.
The 1857 large cent is another example and a contribution to my own thread. This date typically trades for much higher amounts than the Greysheet suggests it should trade for.
<< <i>Once you notice a trend for any given series or date that inferior examples sell for 125% of the guide, normal examples at 200% the guide, and exceptionally nice examples at 300% of the guide, it is no longer a guide. At that point it is just wrong and useless information. You have to draw the line somewhere.
>>
I call that an arbitrage opportunity. It happens with rare coins all the time. You find a seller who does not know the series very well using the greysheet ask. You purchase at that price and turn around and sell it to someone who knows the series and is willing to pay a premium.
My Complete PROOF Lincoln Cent with Major Varieties(1909-2015)Set Registry
If anything, in your example of a wholesale and bid range list, the eventual sales price shouldn't even be included on a grey Sheet simply because it's determined by the needs of the Dealer doing the selling.
Latin American Collection
I can't read the print so its useless to me......
Coin Club Benefit auctions ..... View the Lots
<< <i>Steve, I think you use the Grey Sheet exclusively as a Dealer buying tool. There is however also an ask side to most coins listed. That amount should be a guidepost for both Dealers and Collectors however, on most coins the ask price rarely applies.
If anything, in your example of a wholesale and bid range list, the eventual sales price shouldn't even be included on a grey Sheet simply because it's determined by the needs of the Dealer doing the selling. >>
My understanding of the ask price in the Greysheet is a guideline for buying and selling between professional dealers. When collectors ASSUME that dealers will sell to them at Greysheet ask price rather than negotiate based on a wholesale/retail price range, I believe the collector is ASSUMING incorrectly. Of course, every transaction is different just as every coin is different. My point is in regard to average common coins being traded between a dealer and a collector. Steve
My Complete PROOF Lincoln Cent with Major Varieties(1909-2015)Set Registry
I know it is a hobby, and any expenditures incurred by a hobby should be considered a sunk cost. However, coin collecting is different. I don't mind that my coin has been owned by someone else in the past, and the next owner will not care either. Compare coin collecting to golf. You would not want to buy used golf shoes, and you would expect a discount on used golf balls and clubs. Why is this? It is because this used equipment is not equivalent to its brand-new counterpart. A previously owned coin, however, is identical to any other regardless of how many people have owned it. It is not a depreciating asset.
My fascination with the history of United States coins and currency is the chief reason why I collect. Once several thousand dollars have been spent, a collector needs to assess whether he will ever see that money again, and if so, how much of it he will see. It is also nice to know that numismatic purchases are reversible in case the collector decides to sell at any point.
Besides, no one likes to pay a large amount of money for something only to realize later that it could be been purchased at a better price or that someone else was able to obtain a coin just as nice for an even better price. I don't think anyone is too fond of the concept of overpaying.