Could one of the Bust Half experts attribute this 1827 please.
Goldbully
Posts: 18,182 ✭✭✭✭✭

Please tell me it's an O-124.
0
Goldbully
Posts: 18,182 ✭✭✭✭✭

Comments
Caveat: I did not exclude other die marriages, but just quickly compared the coin to the poor images in the 4th edition of Overton.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
I would concur that it is an O-125 due to the lowest
curl over the 7 extends to the right side of the 2 .
Is there any evidence of a diagonal line through the
T in LIBERTY from the lower left base to the upper
right serif ?
R.I.P. Bear
This was a tricky one. Send it to NGC and they might attribute it as O.124
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
<< <i>I would concur that it is an O-125 due to the lowest
curl over the 7 extends to the right side of the 2 .
>>
This is exactly what I note in order to call it O-125.
You guys really are amazing with your knowledge of this wonderful series.
What exactly is lack of milling? Are you referring to the lack of denticles?
Is there any evidence of a diagonal line through the T in Liberty?
She's in the SDB, but I will check that out this week.
This was a tricky one. Send it to NGC and they might attribute it as O.124
The coin is too worn to see the diagonal die line through the T in LIBERTY. It might appear with different lighting.
For any skeptics who are not convinced, here is OP's coin overlaid with known O.125 and O.124 marriages, respectively. Alignment was done with what was hubbed.
Lance.
Thanks, Lance.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
<< <i>Goldbully's coin has been True View imaged so very large images are available here.
The coin is too worn to see the diagonal die line through the T in LIBERTY. It might appear with different lighting.
For any skeptics who are not convinced, here is OP's coin overlaid with known O.125 and O.124 marriages, respectively. Alignment was done with what was hubbed.
Lance.
Lance, your expertise and photography skills have never been more appreciated.
Your post is one of the nicest replies I have ever had on these forums.
Your animated 1827 CBH gif had to take quite a bit of your time......thanks so much.
It appears mozin was right.
GB
Lava, you are a hoot. I want to meet up with you at a show sometime. And then buy you a couple of beers. Maybe we can get in trouble together.
Mozin...what can I say? You are my mentor. The reason I am a BHNC member. I have a lot more to learn from you so keep the tips coming. I need to pay more attention to the date.
Then there's BustHalfBrian. When I saw your post I knew there was no point in looking further. I'd trust you to attribute my entire collection.
Lance.
<< <i>Anyone using Peterson's book for this attribution? >>
Second request for Barndog.
Thank you.
But I rarely use it. I've never gotten stuck at a point where I needed to check another source.
Lance.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Is this book available anywhere on the Internet?
<< <i>
Is this book available anywhere on the Internet? >>
Not that I know of, unfortunately. But if you find one let me know because I still don't own a copy.
Lance.
1827 O-125
1827 O-124
BHNC member # 184!
http://www.busthalfaddict.com
Cool, though.
Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.
1827 T-I Alignments
BHNC member # 184!
http://www.busthalfaddict.com
<< <i>Hey guys, I added an 1827 Square 2 T-I alignment page. Do you think this will help?
1827 T-I Alignments >>
Wow, what a great reference, Dave.
You did a lot of work putting your CBH die marriages/states Website together.
Thank you very much.
A must bookmark!
On another note, the obverse for the O-124 was first used on the O-135, then used again after O-124 on once again, the O-135. here is my 135 showing an even later die state of Obverse 17
1827 O-135
BHNC member # 184!
http://www.busthalfaddict.com