Your coin is a VLDS O.125. Notice stars 8-13 in relation to the denticles. I should also add that even in the earliest die-state, the obverse die of O.124 shows no traces of milling, while the reverse will show full, strong milling (this is because the reverse die was in its infancy, while the obverse die was being recycled).
This was a tricky one. Send it to NGC and they might attribute it as O.124
Lurking and learning since 2010. Full-time professional numismatist based in SoCal.
Realone, astrorat, LoveMyLiberty, BustHalfBrian, and mozin thanks so much. You guys really are amazing with your knowledge of this wonderful series. What exactly is lack of milling? Are you referring to the lack of denticles?
Is there any evidence of a diagonal line through the T in Liberty? She's in the SDB, but I will check that out this week.
This was a tricky one. Send it to NGC and they might attribute it as O.124
Goldbully's coin has been True View imaged so very large images are available here.
The coin is too worn to see the diagonal die line through the T in LIBERTY. It might appear with different lighting.
For any skeptics who are not convinced, here is OP's coin overlaid with known O.125 and O.124 marriages, respectively. Alignment was done with what was hubbed. Lance.
Lance, if I could overlay coins or shoot photos like you, I'd get nothing done. As it is I get nothing done, but at least if I had your talents I'd have an excuse.
<< <i>Goldbully's coin has been True View imaged so very large images are available here.
The coin is too worn to see the diagonal die line through the T in LIBERTY. It might appear with different lighting.
For any skeptics who are not convinced, here is OP's coin overlaid with known O.125 and O.124 marriages, respectively. Alignment was done with what was hubbed. Lance.
>>
Lance, your expertise and photography skills have never been more appreciated. Your post is one of the nicest replies I have ever had on these forums. Your animated 1827 CBH gif had to take quite a bit of your time......thanks so much. It appears mozin was right.
I'm sorry it didn't turn out to be the O.124, Goldbully. I went down that road a little while back. I returned the coin but I was still intrigued so I spent a little time on this one. Still, it's a very nice bust half. You have a good eye. And at least a few halves I still want. Don't forget.
Lava, you are a hoot. I want to meet up with you at a show sometime. And then buy you a couple of beers. Maybe we can get in trouble together.
Mozin...what can I say? You are my mentor. The reason I am a BHNC member. I have a lot more to learn from you so keep the tips coming. I need to pay more attention to the date.
Then there's BustHalfBrian. When I saw your post I knew there was no point in looking further. I'd trust you to attribute my entire collection. Lance.
Glenn once showed me how he likes to use his book. He will study a certain date, for example, right before a show, then examine every coin of that date on the bourse floor. I witnessed it at a medium-sized show in San Antonio one year. I forget the year he studied for the show, but do recall he found an R-5 at the show (cherried). It's the only half dollar book I own.
Here is an earlier die state for O-125. I need to add some sorting diagnostics to my site to help wade through years like 1827 and narrow things down for all trying to ID these. Here is a linky to O-124 as well.
On another note, the obverse for the O-124 was first used on the O-135, then used again after O-124 on once again, the O-135. here is my 135 showing an even later die state of Obverse 17
Comments
Caveat: I did not exclude other die marriages, but just quickly compared the coin to the poor images in the 4th edition of Overton.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
I would concur that it is an O-125 due to the lowest
curl over the 7 extends to the right side of the 2 .
Is there any evidence of a diagonal line through the
T in LIBERTY from the lower left base to the upper
right serif ?
R.I.P. Bear
This was a tricky one. Send it to NGC and they might attribute it as O.124
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
<< <i>I would concur that it is an O-125 due to the lowest
curl over the 7 extends to the right side of the 2 .
>>
This is exactly what I note in order to call it O-125.
You guys really are amazing with your knowledge of this wonderful series.
What exactly is lack of milling? Are you referring to the lack of denticles?
Is there any evidence of a diagonal line through the T in Liberty?
She's in the SDB, but I will check that out this week.
This was a tricky one. Send it to NGC and they might attribute it as O.124
The coin is too worn to see the diagonal die line through the T in LIBERTY. It might appear with different lighting.
For any skeptics who are not convinced, here is OP's coin overlaid with known O.125 and O.124 marriages, respectively. Alignment was done with what was hubbed.
Lance.
Thanks, Lance.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
<< <i>Goldbully's coin has been True View imaged so very large images are available here.
The coin is too worn to see the diagonal die line through the T in LIBERTY. It might appear with different lighting.
For any skeptics who are not convinced, here is OP's coin overlaid with known O.125 and O.124 marriages, respectively. Alignment was done with what was hubbed.
Lance.
Lance, your expertise and photography skills have never been more appreciated.
Your post is one of the nicest replies I have ever had on these forums.
Your animated 1827 CBH gif had to take quite a bit of your time......thanks so much.
It appears mozin was right.
GB
Lava, you are a hoot. I want to meet up with you at a show sometime. And then buy you a couple of beers. Maybe we can get in trouble together.
Mozin...what can I say? You are my mentor. The reason I am a BHNC member. I have a lot more to learn from you so keep the tips coming. I need to pay more attention to the date.
Then there's BustHalfBrian. When I saw your post I knew there was no point in looking further. I'd trust you to attribute my entire collection.
Lance.
<< <i>Anyone using Peterson's book for this attribution? >>
Second request for Barndog.
Thank you.
But I rarely use it. I've never gotten stuck at a point where I needed to check another source.
Lance.
See http://www.doubledimes.com for a free online reference for US twenty-cent pieces
Is this book available anywhere on the Internet?
<< <i>
Is this book available anywhere on the Internet? >>
Not that I know of, unfortunately. But if you find one let me know because I still don't own a copy.
Lance.
1827 O-125
1827 O-124
BHNC member # 184!
http://www.busthalfaddict.com
Cool, though.
1827 T-I Alignments
BHNC member # 184!
http://www.busthalfaddict.com
<< <i>Hey guys, I added an 1827 Square 2 T-I alignment page. Do you think this will help?
1827 T-I Alignments >>
Wow, what a great reference, Dave.
You did a lot of work putting your CBH die marriages/states Website together.
Thank you very much.
A must bookmark!
On another note, the obverse for the O-124 was first used on the O-135, then used again after O-124 on once again, the O-135. here is my 135 showing an even later die state of Obverse 17
1827 O-135
BHNC member # 184!
http://www.busthalfaddict.com