Options
pcgs sapphire?

.
so, in our never-ending quest to get scratch resistant slabs, my random youtube surfing session (well, one of my hundreds of sessions), i came across this.
maybe it is worth a $50-100 slab that can be inert for all us coin types as well as be scratch resistant for a few hundred years?
i am honestly having trouble mustering the words to describe the depth of frustration at how easily my slabs get small scuffs despite handing them with care and keeping them in bags. perhaps the bags aren't thick enough or perhaps the slabs scuff too easily?
yes, yes, i know. polish them suckers out. i am rather confident that while buffering the slabs makes me much more viewable, they will probably have thousands of micro pls.
lets take it to the next level.
how about making the slabs out of the material the gaskets are made of? they are touted to be very inert and next to impossible to scratch a pf70 coin surface with (watched a video of pcgs rubbing a gasket on such surfaces). can the material be as transparent as plastic or glass?
actually something just occurred to me. perhaps they can just use the material for the area directly around the rev/obv of the coin? perhaps even different diameters to save material?
of course the cost will take some time to be accepted but so did cac and coinfacts.
i'll admit i like the cost-effectiveness of the bags/intercept boxes but that gets to be a bit labor intensive.
i'll also admit to never remembering to request the better slabs that were/are supposed to be more resilient. perhaps they weren't effective enough and thusly not enough positive word-to-mouth or maybe just not enough marketing?
in the age of in-slab coin imaging, itseems pretty important.
.
so, in our never-ending quest to get scratch resistant slabs, my random youtube surfing session (well, one of my hundreds of sessions), i came across this.
maybe it is worth a $50-100 slab that can be inert for all us coin types as well as be scratch resistant for a few hundred years?
i am honestly having trouble mustering the words to describe the depth of frustration at how easily my slabs get small scuffs despite handing them with care and keeping them in bags. perhaps the bags aren't thick enough or perhaps the slabs scuff too easily?
yes, yes, i know. polish them suckers out. i am rather confident that while buffering the slabs makes me much more viewable, they will probably have thousands of micro pls.
lets take it to the next level.
how about making the slabs out of the material the gaskets are made of? they are touted to be very inert and next to impossible to scratch a pf70 coin surface with (watched a video of pcgs rubbing a gasket on such surfaces). can the material be as transparent as plastic or glass?
actually something just occurred to me. perhaps they can just use the material for the area directly around the rev/obv of the coin? perhaps even different diameters to save material?
of course the cost will take some time to be accepted but so did cac and coinfacts.
i'll admit i like the cost-effectiveness of the bags/intercept boxes but that gets to be a bit labor intensive.
i'll also admit to never remembering to request the better slabs that were/are supposed to be more resilient. perhaps they weren't effective enough and thusly not enough positive word-to-mouth or maybe just not enough marketing?
in the age of in-slab coin imaging, itseems pretty important.
.
<--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -
0
Comments
Yes, I have had newly slabbed coins come to me with scratches already on them, but, the coin graded and is safe.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
<< <i>It's been around, you can try monkey glass too. They may be scratch-resistant, but I don't know how well they would fare being dropped. Perhaps a layer of synthetic sapphire or a layer of monkey glass would do better. >>
Good question on the dropping as iPhones with Gorilla glass frequently cracks the glass.
The current slab is a big improvement, I must admit.
Lance.
Link
Someone in PCGS research & development or product engineering and development should seriously look into this. Every time I buy a rarity with scuff marks and scratches on the holder, I know it has to get reholdered, which means more handling etc. I would definitely pay substantially more for a really high-tech high-end holder.
There are a lot of coins out there worth $10,000 and up. Wouldn't it be worth it to have a $100 holder that is truly scuff-proof and scratch-proof? Once sapphire glass gets into volume with Apple, GT may be able to supply for relatively little. Maybe the holders would only be $20 extra, not $100. Then a lot more collectors might opt for it.
One other comment to PCGS ... something else that could easily be improved at very little cost ... I noticed the paper inserts in the holders seem to be made of thinner cheaper paper than in the past, even in the Secure Plus holders. I have some holders where the paper is wavy and not sitting flat, and it looks cheap. Just upgrading the paper stock a little bit would solve this at minimal marginal cost. Just a suggestion !!!
Best,
Sunnywood
Sunnywood's Rainbow-Toned Morgans (Retired)
Sunnywood's Barber Quarters (Retired)
<< <i>It's all a matter of hardness. Something harder will scratch something softer, something softer won't scratch something harder. The MHO's scale. Watch part 2 of Marques video:
Link >>
Fixed link
LEXAN MR10 sheet is mar-and graffiti-resistant. It combines the impact strength of LEXAN polycarbonate sheet with a proprietary abrasion and UV-resistant MARGARD® II surface. It is warranted against yellowing, breakage, coating failure and loss of light transmission and offers improved resistance to weathering and forced entry protection. It is useful for schools, store, transit shelters and other high-traffic areas.
High-impact LEXAN® MR10-112 polycarbonate sheet can be utilized for primary glazing, or on either side of existing glazing for economical protection against breakage or intrusion. A better insulator than glass, LEXAN® MR10 sheet contributes to lower energy costs.
Other attributes of LEXAN® MR10-112, Abrasion Resistant Polycarbonate Sheet products include:
250 times the impact strength of glass
Excellent light transmission
Excellent sound abatement properties
Superior insulating properties
Good sound abatement properties
Available in transparent (clear), tinted
Engineering specifications for LEXAN® MR10-112 Abrasion Resistant Polycarbonate Sheet Products:
Tensile Strength – 9,500 psi
Compressive Strength – 12,500 psi
Water Absorption (24 hours) – 0.15%
Heat Deflection Temperature @66 psi - .280°F
Brittle Temperature -211°F
Flammability - Horizontal Burn (Flame Spread) AEB, Value <1
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
<< <i>And they'll still put them in the holder crooked. >>
Looks like no QC at PCGS........
OINK
<< <i>There are a lot of coins out there worth $10,000 and up. Wouldn't it be worth it to have a $100 holder that is truly scuff-proof and scratch-proof? >>
Yes, particularly if the optics are excellent. I would pay this. And I think registry leaders would do the same.
Many companies understand that packaging matters. Think Tiffany, Saks, or Apple, e.g. With most of these products the impression is made then the material is tossed. For collectors, even better...they would live with the coins for a long time. Sign me up.
Lance.
because obviously some people must have too much money.
If I were a share holder I would hope the cost were researched and smartly applied in order for all slabs to become this material and PCGS stay on top of the market place. If PCGS
offered this for ONLY high end coins or as an optional service, NGC would be smart to make ALL their slabs out of this stuff.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
<< <i>uneconomical at best. >>
I would imagine that the product is actually quite low cost to produce and use. Almost all Android phones use some iteration of synthetic sapphire or gorilla glass.