Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Real or Fake? 1870cc Half Dollar

AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,039 ✭✭✭✭✭
First I've seen but is it fake all the way or just an added mint mark?

bobimage


1870cc
Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com

Comments

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,084 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not genuine, but the pics are so bad I cannot tell if just the mint mark is fake or the entire coin.
    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    .
    added mintmark or mintmarks image

    does it increase in value going from charlotte to carson city?
    .

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • Options
    BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,200 ✭✭✭✭
    The mintmark does look a little funky...

    But I would need better pics to say with absolute certainty that it's fake. Still, I suggest avoiding the coin (if you were ever interested in bidding).
  • Options
    tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
    Looks added. Bad pics on expensive coin is always a flag
  • Options
    DaveWcoinsDaveWcoins Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭
    Can you contact the seller and ask for blurrier photos?

    He has several photos of the coin -- all quite blurry -- but I think they could still be blurrier. I can still make out the date.

    Seriously, we would need better photos to have a shot at determining authenticity.

    Proceed with caution.
    Dave Wnuck. Redbook contributor; long time PNG Member; listed on the PCGS Board of Experts. PM me with your email address to receive my e-newsletter, and visit DaveWcoins.com Find me on eBay at davewcoins
  • Options
    jmcu12jmcu12 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭
    I agree with the 'fake' crowd
    Awarded latest "YOU SUCK!": June 11, 2014
  • Options
    tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
    The second C on this one looks higher. Looking at my WB book. They are even.
  • Options
    BustHalfBrianBustHalfBrian Posts: 4,200 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The second C on this one looks higher. Looking at my WB book. They are even. >>



    Looking at CoinFacts, I believe there were at least two reverse dies used for this date, both with different mintmark placements.

    I'm not saying I think the eBay coin is legit, but just that comparing one coin's mintmark placement to that of another coin is not always the best way to determine authenticity. Now if a certain type of coin was struck using only one reverse die for that date, then mintmark placement could be used to conclude whether it's real or not.
  • Options
    DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,432 ✭✭✭✭✭
    When in doubt, I check the seller's other items.

    It usually provides you a very good clue.

    In this case, if you're thinking 'genuine', then you better think again.
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • Options
    tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
    Busthalfbrian - You are correct. I should not of been so quick. This time I pulled out the Registry by Bugert. And there are 3 reverses - and on the 3rd reverse the second C is high.
  • Options
    shorecollshorecoll Posts: 5,447 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just reading the back "story" makes me think fake.
    ANA-LM, NBS, EAC
  • Options
    Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,152 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Just reading the back "story" makes me think fake. >>


    Ya think? image I don't know nuthin about no coins, but I took it to a coin guy I know and he tried to rip me off.....LOL!

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • Options
    tydyetydye Posts: 3,894 ✭✭✭
    Here are the 3 reverse CCs from Bugert's book
    image
  • Options
    Whole coin is fake. Look at the edge...IT IS CLAD! Run Forrest Run.
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,895 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Not genuine, but the pics are so bad I cannot tell if just the mint mark is fake or the entire coin. >>



    Yes another out of focus picture for an expensive coin ...

    We see this pattern time and time again.

    You can take this one to the bank. If the photography sucks the piece offered probably sucks too ... in a VERY BIG way.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,510 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I would stay away, blurry images, key date, no returns, estate story, jewelry box, nuff said. Better images would help tremendously.
    World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
  • Options
    kazkaz Posts: 9,367 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The mm may very well look ok if it's a transfer die copy. Image is just fuzzy enough to obscure crucial details. funny that all pix are fuzzy to the same degree! Looks like a pirate ship with red flags flying along w/skull and crossbones. Aaaarh!
  • Options
    DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Look at the 7 and 0 in the date. The 7 is much smaller than on a genuine 1870-CC, and both the 7 and 0 are bolder and slightly different in font character than the 1 and 8.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,039 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Look at the 7 and 0 in the date. The 7 is much smaller than on a genuine 1870-CC, and both the 7 and 0 are bolder and slightly different in font character than the 1 and 8. >>



    I picked up on that before I saw the reverse......yes, I agree.

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    rec78rec78 Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭✭✭
    If you have a fake coin use bad pics and maybe you can fool smoeone. In this day and age a two year old can take better photos. Bad pix=bad coin.

    image
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 25,039 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Oh my, ebay is fast. Didn't even report and it's gone already.....thanks all.

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file