Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much.
It's a bit disappointing that they will be lowering the relief. With digital sculpting today, even using the original galvano isn't quite the same anymore:
<< <i>Mint officials plan to use the Kennedy half dollar’s original obverse design, which was created by U.S. Mint Chief Engraver Gilroy Roberts for a medal and adapted for coin use.
U.S. Mint officials stated during the CCAC meeting that Roberts’ original plaster model for the coin’s obverse has not been located.
U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White, responding by email Feb. 12 to Coin World’s questions, said: “We located the galvano from 1964 and scanned that to capture the detail. We then located the 1964 master tooling and scanned that to determine heights of relief, basin curvature, and aspect ratio of the effigy. The galvano scan was then digitally modified to reduce height of relief and aspect ratio, while being true to the 1964 sculpt (galvano). The final digital sculpt was placed on the basin, lettering added, and tooling generated for testing. >>
<< <i>It's a bit disappointing that they will be lowering the relief. With digital sculpting today, even using the original galvano isn't quite the same anymore:
<< <i>Mint officials plan to use the Kennedy half dollar’s original obverse design, which was created by U.S. Mint Chief Engraver Gilroy Roberts for a medal and adapted for coin use.
U.S. Mint officials stated during the CCAC meeting that Roberts’ original plaster model for the coin’s obverse has not been located.
U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White, responding by email Feb. 12 to Coin World’s questions, said: “We located the galvano from 1964 and scanned that to capture the detail. We then located the 1964 master tooling and scanned that to determine heights of relief, basin curvature, and aspect ratio of the effigy. The galvano scan was then digitally modified to reduce height of relief and aspect ratio, while being true to the 1964 sculpt (galvano). The final digital sculpt was placed on the basin, lettering added, and tooling generated for testing. >>
>>
Yeah yeah yeah!
Just from looking at the photographs, there's just not much to get excited about unless you get excited about the current Silver Proof crap they produce. The laser etching, IMO, DETROYS any design effort put into the coin.
It's just junk.
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
the 2013 Mint annual report stated, without any condition, there would be a 50th anniversary release of some sort.
it would be cool from a collecting standpoint to have accented hair. However, since that was changed 50 years ago with cause, then I don't think it should change back.
<< <i>it would be cool from a collecting standpoint to have accented hair. However, since that was changed 50 years ago with cause, then I don't think it should change back. >>
I would like to think it depends on what the galvano has
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. >>
I disagree.
It has been shown over and over again that collectors are inspired by past designs.
Michael Moran, a collector on the CCAC panel, said, “It’s going to sell well however you do it.” >>
The "current" Kennedy Design and "current manufacturing process" (which totally destroys any detail of the design) will certainly not make an inspirational collectible. Past designs that are "inspirational" are the Walking Liberty Design on the SAE, the Saint Gaudens Design on the UHR and the Buffalo Design on the 1 oz Bullion Piece.
A modern presidential "design" is anything BUT inspirational and to compare a re-creation of the Kennedy Design in .9999 fine gold with these past designs only goes to demonstrate what CCAC is all about and why current coin designs have totally sucked since the inception of the CCAC.
Any inspiration at all will come at the cost of the buyers once the flippers start moving these through First Strike™ Labels and gawd only knows what other labels that could be dreamt up by clever marketers. The coin itself will suck and its design, as presented, will suck and there will be hundreds of "gold plated" knockoffs flooding the markets. If anything at all, the flippers will suck any value out of the coin by playing up the 50th Anniversary aspect of a blaise, at best, design modification, which, in and of itself, was first introduced for the BiCentennial Series.
Personally, I think the US Mint and the Treasury Department dropped the ball on this project which could have had some real meat. But as it sits, its a really bad idea.
I decided to change calling the bathroom the John and renamed it the Jim. I feel so much better saying I went to the Jim this morning.
I keep forgetting about all the other "design improvements" made to the Kennedy bust and reverse over the years. It's going to be .9999 gold, so I think they can use the higher relief and finer details on the 64 version than the spaghetti, hard-parted hair on the obverse and the squashed chicken legs on the reverse.
I seem to remember there were other complaints lately to include. Anyone have any to add?
certainly the gold plated knock offs will need to be mentioned as I'd think that's likely if these are minted with just the 2014 date. We'll see P & D plated knock offs like racketeer nickels were made.
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much. >>
Disagree. To me, what the mint is producing now is "uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much."
You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much. >>
Disagree. To me, what the mint is producing now is "uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much." >>
The Kennedy Half Dollar is a coin that the US Mint is producing now. If you believe what they are producing now is "uninspired and honestly not worth the effort," then how is making the exact same coin in gold any better?
Yep. Finish the series with a gold one. And don't do the double-date. This is a commemorative of a president who was assassinated. A double date looks like it's his b & d dates.
We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last. --Severian the Lame
<< <i>Yep. Finish the series with a gold one. And don't do the double-date. This is a commemorative of a president who was assassinated. A double date looks like it's his b & d dates. >>
Finish with gold and offer two varieties. Double Dated and single dated. That will make the speculators go crazy. Then follow up with a new design with the same size only make it workable, as a $2 coin, or a $5 coin. People's Choice. (clad, of course for 2015 and beyond)
If I tried to buy every product offered by the US mint (not to mention the world's mints annual output), or even very many of them
I'd have no funds, time, or space to buy, handle, and store all that stuff, and no funds to buy the rare old well-circulated coins that I love
I'm absolutely thrilled that stuff like this, and all other perfect bullion and base metal proofs, and grading fees and high prices for the top few percent of billions suck up the hobby money.
I shudder to imagine what a 200 year old US coin with a surviving population of a couple hundred in all grades, most of them very low would cost if all that cash was chasing it instead of this crap
Still no word on the reverse?? That could be quite important and influence sales. Unlikely though, since it will be something from the 'committee'.... So stupid to leave coin designs to committee's instead of artists... and ONE artist....wow... the U.S. might even get attractive coinage. Ya think?? Cheers, RickO
How much taxpayer money is spent on the brain trust that comes up with these terrific coining ideas? And how many officials are tasked with this difficult job?
I wonder if they hold court in a fine DC Restaurant everyday? Sounds like a nice job for those that can get it.
I like the whole idea the Mint has finally decided to mint a tribute for the 50 year Ann. It's about time! Gold is nice but Silver is the essential choice of metal. Silver is what were accustomed to on the Kennedy half. Nice gesture for us Kennedy half lovers!
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.
If we are commemorating assassinations- the 150th Anniversary of Lincoln's death is coming up in 2015. I would not mind seeing a Lincoln Gold Commemorative next year. I would not like the reverse proof version of the Kennedy. I think this novelty has been worn out by the mint. Though wouldn't mind a ultra high relief version.
Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort.
IMHO you are correct about the design being "uninspired" but since it will sell easily to the Numismatic-Lemmings it is well worth the effort, thus rendering any new design ideas a moot point. I will add that I am on board with the idea to end this NCLT issue.
Put Lady Liberty on the next series at this denomination. >>
Couldn't agree more with you ! >>
Totally agree. After 51 years, it's time for a change. I think Ronald Reagan would be a good replacement.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
<< <i>They need to put a tribute to Marilyn on the reverse. >>
Good idea. Put JFK's girlfriend on the reverse in that famous Playboy centerfold pose and you'll have a guaranteed sell-out.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
What the illustrations show is not the original 1964 actual coin. It could well be the original galvano design.
Mrs. Kennedy was shown trial strikes and requested less hair part and more hair highlights. This was done on a 5 inch intermediate model. Both the accented hair and regular 1964's are post hair part change. The accented hair may be part of the more hair highlights, but I don't know. Perhaps the lock of hair on top of the tail of R was part of that change. That change is in relief rather than incuse, so was done at a different stage.
The two differences from a 1964 coin, due to Mrs. Kennedy, I see in the illustration are: 1. A more pronounced hair part. 2. Hair overflowing the tail of R in LIBERTY.
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much. >>
Comments
- I hope they make an Accented Hair variety
- I would prefer the dual date to indicate the commemorative nature.
Indian Head $10 Gold Date Set Album
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. >>
I disagree.
It has been shown over and over again that collectors are inspired by past designs.
Michael Moran, a collector on the CCAC panel, said, “It’s going to sell well however you do it.”
<< <i>Mint officials plan to use the Kennedy half dollar’s original obverse design, which was created by U.S. Mint Chief Engraver Gilroy Roberts for a medal and adapted for coin use.
U.S. Mint officials stated during the CCAC meeting that Roberts’ original plaster model for the coin’s obverse has not been located.
U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White, responding by email Feb. 12 to Coin World’s questions, said: “We located the galvano from 1964 and scanned that to capture the detail. We then located the 1964 master tooling and scanned that to determine heights of relief, basin curvature, and aspect ratio of the effigy. The galvano scan was then digitally modified to reduce height of relief and aspect ratio, while being true to the 1964 sculpt (galvano). The final digital sculpt was placed on the basin, lettering added, and tooling generated for testing. >>
Put Lady Liberty on the next series at this denomination.
No Way Out: Stimulus and Money Printing Are the Only Path Left
<< <i>That Clinton half dollar looks good in gold. >>
Other people think it looks like Clinton as well:
<< <i>It's a bit disappointing that they will be lowering the relief. With digital sculpting today, even using the original galvano isn't quite the same anymore:
<< <i>Mint officials plan to use the Kennedy half dollar’s original obverse design, which was created by U.S. Mint Chief Engraver Gilroy Roberts for a medal and adapted for coin use.
U.S. Mint officials stated during the CCAC meeting that Roberts’ original plaster model for the coin’s obverse has not been located.
U.S. Mint spokesman Michael White, responding by email Feb. 12 to Coin World’s questions, said: “We located the galvano from 1964 and scanned that to capture the detail. We then located the 1964 master tooling and scanned that to determine heights of relief, basin curvature, and aspect ratio of the effigy. The galvano scan was then digitally modified to reduce height of relief and aspect ratio, while being true to the 1964 sculpt (galvano). The final digital sculpt was placed on the basin, lettering added, and tooling generated for testing. >>
>>
Yeah yeah yeah!
Just from looking at the photographs, there's just not much to get excited about unless you get excited about the current Silver Proof crap they produce. The laser etching, IMO, DETROYS any design effort put into the coin.
It's just junk.
The name is LEE!
it would be cool from a collecting standpoint to have accented hair. However, since that was changed 50 years ago with cause, then I don't think it should change back.
<< <i>Do this and finish the series.
Put Lady Liberty on the next series at this denomination. >>
Couldn't agree more with you !
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
<< <i>it would be cool from a collecting standpoint to have accented hair. However, since that was changed 50 years ago with cause, then I don't think it should change back. >>
I would like to think it depends on what the galvano has
“I want you to remember that no * ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb * die for his country”
<< <i>
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. >>
I disagree.
It has been shown over and over again that collectors are inspired by past designs.
Michael Moran, a collector on the CCAC panel, said, “It’s going to sell well however you do it.” >>
The "current" Kennedy Design and "current manufacturing process" (which totally destroys any detail of the design) will certainly not make an inspirational collectible. Past designs that are "inspirational" are the Walking Liberty Design on the SAE, the Saint Gaudens Design on the UHR and the Buffalo Design on the 1 oz Bullion Piece.
A modern presidential "design" is anything BUT inspirational and to compare a re-creation of the Kennedy Design in .9999 fine gold with these past designs only goes to demonstrate what CCAC is all about and why current coin designs have totally sucked since the inception of the CCAC.
Any inspiration at all will come at the cost of the buyers once the flippers start moving these through First Strike™ Labels and gawd only knows what other labels that could be dreamt up by clever marketers. The coin itself will suck and its design, as presented, will suck and there will be hundreds of "gold plated" knockoffs flooding the markets. If anything at all, the flippers will suck any value out of the coin by playing up the 50th Anniversary aspect of a blaise, at best, design modification, which, in and of itself, was first introduced for the BiCentennial Series.
Personally, I think the US Mint and the Treasury Department dropped the ball on this project which could have had some real meat. But as it sits, its a really bad idea.
The name is LEE!
I keep forgetting about all the other "design improvements" made to the Kennedy bust and reverse over the years. It's going to be .9999 gold, so I think they can use the higher relief and finer details on the 64 version than the spaghetti, hard-parted hair on the obverse and the squashed chicken legs on the reverse.
I seem to remember there were other complaints lately to include. Anyone have any to add?
certainly the gold plated knock offs will need to be mentioned as I'd think that's likely if these are minted with just the 2014 date. We'll see P & D plated knock offs like racketeer nickels were made.
<< <i>
<< <i>That Clinton half dollar looks good in gold. >>
Other people think it looks like Clinton as well:
Thats 4 nines
and is there an accented cigar variety ?
Steve
<< <i>blaise >>
That's my brother's name.
<< <i>
<< <i>blaise >>
That's my brother's name. >>
Oops. I mispelled bla·sé
The name is LEE!
As for the proposed Kennedy gold coin... I have no problem with it, and actually think it is kind of neat.
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much. >>
Disagree. To me, what the mint is producing now is "uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much."
<< <i>
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much. >>
Disagree. To me, what the mint is producing now is "uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much." >>
The Kennedy Half Dollar is a coin that the US Mint is producing now. If you believe what they are producing now is "uninspired and honestly not worth the effort," then how is making the exact same coin in gold any better?
Indian Head $10 Gold Date Set Album
<< <i>Do this and finish the series.
Put Lady Liberty on the next series at this denomination. >>
Amen!
JH
Proof Buffalo Registry Set
Capped Bust Quarters Registry Set
Proof Walking Liberty Halves Registry Set
--Severian the Lame
<< <i>Yep. Finish the series with a gold one. And don't do the double-date. This is a commemorative of a president who was assassinated. A double date looks like it's his b & d dates. >>
Finish with gold and offer two varieties. Double Dated and single dated. That will make the speculators go crazy.
Then follow up with a new design with the same size only make it workable, as a $2 coin, or a $5 coin. People's Choice. (clad, of course for 2015 and beyond)
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
I'd have no funds, time, or space to buy, handle, and store all that stuff, and no funds to buy the rare old well-circulated coins that I love
I'm absolutely thrilled that stuff like this, and all other perfect bullion and base metal proofs, and grading fees and high prices for the top few percent of billions suck up the hobby money.
I shudder to imagine what a 200 year old US coin with a surviving population of a couple hundred in all grades, most of them very low
would cost if all that cash was chasing it instead of this crap
great coin tho!
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
tasked with this difficult job?
I wonder if they hold court in a fine DC Restaurant everyday? Sounds like a nice job for those that can get it.
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.Box of 20
IMHO you are correct about the design being "uninspired" but since it will sell easily to the Numismatic-Lemmings it is well worth the effort, thus rendering any new design ideas a moot point. I will add that I am on board with the idea to end this NCLT issue.
<< <i>
<< <i>Do this and finish the series.
Put Lady Liberty on the next series at this denomination. >>
Couldn't agree more with you ! >>
Totally agree. After 51 years, it's time for a change. I think Ronald Reagan would be a good replacement.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Well, just Love coins, period.
<< <i>They need to put a tribute to Marilyn on the reverse.
Good idea. Put JFK's girlfriend on the reverse in that famous Playboy centerfold pose and you'll have a guaranteed sell-out.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Mrs. Kennedy was shown trial strikes and requested less hair part and more hair highlights. This was done on a 5 inch intermediate model. Both the accented hair and regular 1964's are post hair part change. The accented hair may be part of the more hair highlights, but I don't know. Perhaps the lock of hair on top of the tail of R was part of that change.
That change is in relief rather than incuse, so was done at a different stage.
The two differences from a 1964 coin, due to Mrs. Kennedy, I see in the illustration are:
1. A more pronounced hair part.
2. Hair overflowing the tail of R in LIBERTY.
<< <i>Reproducing an existing coin in another material is uninspired and honestly not worth the effort. Looks too much like one of those gold plated novelty coins the kids like so much. >>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the GOLD BUFFALO'S turned out well.
GRANDAM
<< <i>I think the GOLD BUFFALO'S turned out well. >>
Those are nice coins.