Home U.S. Coin Forum

Shooting dimes with a 55mm Nikkor

morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,485 ✭✭✭✭✭
Lets see your dime attempts, this is my first with this lens. I had to get creative and was working about 7" off the dime, using PCGS slabs stacked up image

image


Increased the working distance to about 10" (reduction of stacked PCGS slabs) image The increase allowed me to shed more light onto the dime. If I can do this with a 55, what will a 105 do for me? Now it's clear why you guys have always said, go with a 105.

image
World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO

Comments

  • mgoodm3mgoodm3 Posts: 17,497 ✭✭✭
    If you have a teleconverter you can get some extra working distance at the same magnification. 55's have great sharpness, but the working distance is not so hot for small coins.
    coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
  • rmpsrpmsrmpsrpms Posts: 1,954 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The short working distance, combined with largish diameter of the lens, makes lighting difficult. It's virtually impossible to get lighting in at high angles unless you place the lights physically between the lens an the coin, and good luck with that. Because of this I personally only consider using the 55 for larger coins or full slab shots.
    PM me for coin photography equipment, or visit my website:

    http://macrocoins.com
  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    its very good, so be happy
    I can see the tension building up for a 150mm lens

    image
    LCoopie = Les
  • lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's an old one. This was taken with a 180mm macro.
    Lance.

    image

    image
  • morgansforevermorgansforever Posts: 8,485 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This resides in an old ANACS slab. Came out sorta fuzzy as the dime is crooked in the slab.

    image
    World coins FSHO Hundreds of successful BST transactions U.S. coins FSHO
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Great photography.... Cheers, RickO
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,314 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Dimes are where using a 55 macro is going to show some limitations. Your lighting angle is noticeably lower here because your working distance is so short. Try backing up so you have 12" instead of 7". The picture will be smaller, but it will look better. The crops you'll post here will still probably be shrunk down from what you get out of the camera.
  • You could also get a programmable ring flash that fits around the end of the lens giving you light from all angles
  • rmpsrpmsrmpsrpms Posts: 1,954 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Lets see your dime attempts, this is my first with this lens. I had to get creative and was working about 7" off the dime, using PCGS slabs stacked up image

    image snipped[/IMG]


    Increased the working distance to about 10" (reduction of stacked PCGS slabs) image The increase allowed me to shed more light onto the dime. If I can do this with a 55, what will a 105 do for me? Now it's clear why you guys have always said, go with a 105.

    image snipped >>



    How much are you cropping / downsizing the images at these two working distances?
    PM me for coin photography equipment, or visit my website:

    http://macrocoins.com
  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,542 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This thread has my dimes that I shot with a 105mm Nikon Macro.
    I stacked a 2x Teleconverter for the varieties.

    I think you have seen them though. Camera is a Nikon D300.
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file