Home U.S. Coin Forum

Many thanks to crypto79 for his advice and expertise concerning my 1877 Trade Dollar...it's now more

2»

Comments

  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭
    Here's another one of the same variety, not to hijack the thread. NGC63

    image
    image
  • bidaskbidask Posts: 14,031 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I think Heritage has a PCGS 65 1877 Trade dollar coming up in their pre ANA auction

    What kind of variety is it? >>


    Your average Joe 1877 P Trade Dollar. Weakly struck and very pretty. >>

    That average Joe and very pretty coin brought $19,775, what would an 1877 that had full stars and not so weakly struck in PCGS MS 65 be worth?
    I manage money. I earn money. I save money .
    I give away money. I collect money.
    I don’t love money . I do love the Lord God.




  • GoldbullyGoldbully Posts: 17,982 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Here's another one of the same variety, not to hijack the thread. NGC63

    image
    image >>



    Gorgeous T$1......thanks for sharing.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,218 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>I think Heritage has a PCGS 65 1877 Trade dollar coming up in their pre ANA auction

    What kind of variety is it? >>


    Your average Joe 1877 P Trade Dollar. Weakly struck and very pretty. >>

    That average Joe and very pretty coin brought $19,775, what would an 1877 that had full stars and not so weakly struck in PCGS MS 65 be worth? >>



    More

    At one point I owned three of the then pop of six. It wasn't until the best one got rewarded that I sold the other two off.
  • MilkmanDanMilkmanDan Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>I think Heritage has a PCGS 65 1877 Trade dollar coming up in their pre ANA auction

    What kind of variety is it? >>


    Your average Joe 1877 P Trade Dollar. Weakly struck and very pretty. >>

    That average Joe and very pretty coin brought $19,775, what would an 1877 that had full stars and not so weakly struck in PCGS MS 65 be worth? >>



    More

    At one point I owned three of the then pop of six. It wasn't until the best one got rewarded that I sold the other two off. >>


    I see there are 2 77p graded MS66 now. Was the second one a recent make?
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Whoa! That's news to me! Will check it out
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I am absolutely shocked the second coin was graded MS66. I knew that PCGS had finally relaxed on the stars for MS65, now it appears so for MS66 as well!
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 36,016 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Is that the Secure Plus photo on the cert verification page? It looks nothing like the TrueView photo. If I saw your coin and the one on the cert verficiation page, I'd question the authenticity of your coin? >>




    spots and toning variations provide enough clues to tell it is the same coin, but that is the WORST s.p. photo I've ever seen.

    If I were pcgs I'd swap in the T.V. photo for the s.p. image. image

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>I think Heritage has a PCGS 65 1877 Trade dollar coming up in their pre ANA auction

    What kind of variety is it? >>


    Your average Joe 1877 P Trade Dollar. Weakly struck and very pretty. >>

    That average Joe and very pretty coin brought $19,775, what would an 1877 that had full stars and not so weakly struck in PCGS MS 65 be worth? >>



    More

    At one point I owned three of the then pop of six. It wasn't until the best one got rewarded that I sold the other two off. >>


    I see there are 2 77p graded MS66 now. Was the second one a recent make? >>


    Funny that you mention it, that coin bidask was referencing earlier in the thread (pre-ANA gem 77P) is now the latest 66 at PCGS. Check out the images and this was the original auction I am referring to...

    Link

    I too am surprised it got the bump, not so much because of the strike but because of the intensity of bag marks. The coin is quite dark in hand as well, IIRC.
  • MilkmanDanMilkmanDan Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I am absolutely shocked the second coin was graded MS66. I knew that PCGS had finally relaxed on the stars for MS65, now it appears so for MS66 as well! >>


    Agreed. It's a nice coin but...
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I never thought I'd see an MS66 trade dollar without fully struck stars. I suppose if the coin is otherwise an MS68 then it makes sense...
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭
    Perhaps this will help the thread un-stick?
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I never thought I'd see an MS66 trade dollar without fully struck stars. I suppose if the coin is otherwise an MS68 then it makes sense... >>


    The best part is that the new 66 is not even a 66 on technical merit disregarding the strength of the strike.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,218 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>I never thought I'd see an MS66 trade dollar without fully struck stars. I suppose if the coin is otherwise an MS68 then it makes sense... >>


    The best part is that the new 66 is not even a 66 on technical merit disregarding the strength of the strike. >>



    Not having seen the coin, I cannot comment on that aspect. But it certainly didn't sell for 'shot 66' money.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Just viewed the large images at Heritage. I guess all I can say is "thank goodness for CAC". Sigh
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Just viewed the large images at Heritage. I guess all I can say is "thank goodness for CAC". Sigh >>


    The Heritage images make it quite easy to pass judgement on coins sometimes image
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,218 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Agreed. I just think the coin itself should be a high end 67 to net grade to 66 with that strike. With the general caveat that in hand inspection is important, I just don't see it.
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭
    Now the real question is, will that spot between stars 10 and 11 grow now that the gunk was removed in the intermittent time between the 65 and 66 holder. That fresh metal can wreak havoc on the coin in a few years...
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Just viewed the large images at Heritage. I guess all I can say is "thank goodness for CAC". Sigh >>


    The coin is back in the New York auction: Link

    It'll be interesting to see how much it goes for. Those removed spots in the right obverse field...image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file