Options
Mini hoard of EOR toners pics inside
FreddieH
Posts: 88
Just picked these up
Theyre all 1963 P roosie end of rollers from the midwest. I didnt pick up the last one since it was just a crusty black.
They are more neon and vibrant in hand not pastel like the photos show.
Hope you guys enjoy
Theyre all 1963 P roosie end of rollers from the midwest. I didnt pick up the last one since it was just a crusty black.
They are more neon and vibrant in hand not pastel like the photos show.
Hope you guys enjoy
Looking forward to learning more about coins from fellow well respected numismatists
0
Comments
Hmm. Well, a lot of coins I have seen that look like that are either in a pile of stuff near a dirty laundry machine with half dried soap nearby, or are deliberate AT. Others might have different opinions/experience.
Best wishes,
Eric
Edited to add: I would suggest looking at the threads here about color and also searching through various websites and making notes, mental or otherwise, about color and so on. If you can get to a coin show by you and look around that would be better - nothing like in the hand. A young collector ought to look more than acquire IMHO. In short - you will save money.
have you compared this look to other EOR toners?
Best wishes,
Eric
the appear as authentic dimes to me, the toning however...questionable
.
<--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -
<< <i>.
the appear as authentic dimes to me, the toning however...questionable
. >>
I was thinking the same thing, but really hate being the bearer of bad news . . .
HH
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
And, considering the value of the coins involved, why would anyone bother to use any AT process on them?
<< <i>NT.. thoughts about AT discount the established fact the there CAN be seepage from the chemicals in the wrapper that affects both sides of the coins and/or multiple coins in the roll. Certain 1939-D 10c's (all from two rolls found in PA) have amazing color that often bled onto the reverse. Even without reverse toning, how else would so many coins from the same roll(s) have such amazing color?. Consider the tightness of the wrapper, lack of uniformity of various wrappers and varying environmental factors involved.
And, considering the value of the coins involved, why would anyone bother to use any AT process on them? >>
Practice.
My icon IS my coin. It is a gem 1949 FBL Franklin.
And, considering the value of the coins involved, why would anyone bother to use any AT process on them?
I bought a roll of 1964-D Kennedys with toning on both sides of every coin due to "less than archival" storage conditions. I still have 16 of them, and PCGS has certified all 4 of the ones I submitted to them, and another of the ones that I sold to a forum member.
I also have a bunch of original rolls of 1958-P and 1959-P Roosies with vibrant toning on the end coins. Those colors are entirely correct and possible.
I knew it would happen.
bob
I'm guessing that his coins look lots better than his initial pics.
I knew it would happen.
Also and EOR Lincoln where you can see the reverse has stayed bright red while the obverse has some interesting colors.
I think these are examples of NT and NT EOR toners.
<< <i>... Practice. >>
As toning results vary based on series and even dates within a series, considering Roosies, why bother? Anyone risking doing this, even after good results on the same date, with a 67FB coin?
CJ -
Empty Nest Collection
Matt’s Mattes