Home U.S. Coin Forum

q about 1793 half cents

On the heels of the recent post on the cool unstruck 1793 half cent planchet....

For those of you who have handled a raw 1793 half cent (I have one but it's encased in a slab) do they have a thicker edge than, say, that of a U.S nickel? Or similar?

Comments

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,419 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The 1793 half cents are significantly thicker than nickels.
    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • NewEnglandRaritiesNewEnglandRarities Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭✭
    Much thicker than a nickel, if memory serves (it's been awhile sine I've handled one raw) somewhat thicker than a Morgan dollar as well. Slightly less than a late date large cent comes to mind.
    New England Rarities...Dealer In Colonial Coinage and Americana
  • MidLifeCrisisMidLifeCrisis Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>somewhat thicker than a Morgan dollar as well. >>


    That's not something I would have guessed.
  • Wow, I didn't realize-- I had always thought they were similar in thickness to the liberty cap, draped bust, etc. half cents. Sounds like they were quite a bit thicker and heavier. THanks all.
  • It really is a shame when you get down to it what all of the plastic encasements have taken away from this hobby.
  • lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 43,884 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Wow, I didn't realize-- I had always thought they were similar in thickness to the liberty cap, draped bust, etc. half cents. Sounds like they were quite a bit thicker and heavier. THanks all. >>

    Ditto. I had no idea.

    Funny, I just had a replica with the COPY stamp cross my desk just yesterday (Red BU! Woo!) but I didn't examine it very closely or look at the edge.

    Explore collections of lordmarcovan on CollecOnline, management, safe-keeping, sharing and valuation solution for art piece and collectibles.
  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,731 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It really is a shame when you get down to it what all of the plastic encasements have taken away from this hobby. >>



    Indeed! That is why I fought against encasement when I was Senior Authenticator at ANACS. I was a Numismatist!
    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,799 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Wow, I didn't realize-- I had always thought they were similar in thickness to the liberty cap, draped bust, etc. half cents. Sounds like they were quite a bit thicker and heavier. THanks all. >>



    You must remember that there was weight reduction in the cent and half cent at the end of 1795, and the diameter of the 1793 half cent was 22mm while the 1794 half cents were 23.50 mm. The official weight for the 1793 and lettered edge 1794 half cents was 6.74 grams while for the plain edge pieces it was 5.44 grams. All of this made the 1793 half cent thicker and heavier.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • PonyExpress8PonyExpress8 Posts: 1,670 ✭✭✭
    Bingo BillJones. Just what I was going to post. image
    The End of the Line in the West.

    Website-Americana Rare Coin Inc
  • notwilightnotwilight Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭
    There are lots of low grade coins you can handle. I am in favor of encasing to protect coins. I have seen numerous large cents with recent dings from handling errors. Don't even say the S word. --Jerry

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file