Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1996-W dimes vs. 2012-S quarters

OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,314 ✭✭✭✭✭
Which do you think is the better value?

1996-W clad uncirculated dime.
Price: about $13.
Mintage: 1.45 million.

2012-S clad uncirculated quarters.
3 sets of all 5 designs. (Total: 15 coins.)
Price: about $13.
Mintage:
El Yunque: 1.7 million.
Other four: 1.4 million each.

Comments

  • Options
    commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,100 ✭✭✭
    Dimes.

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • Options
    Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It will take some time but i'll go with the 'S' mint Quarters. More up swing then the one Dime, All gone from the mint sold out is a good thing.image


    Edit for spelling.


    Hoard the keys.
  • Options
    jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,972 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The quarters will keep more people involved, so I'd say quarters.
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,163 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Here's a modern coin topic I actually find interesting to think about.

    After consideration, I think I'll agree with Type2 and jmski52.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    jmcu12jmcu12 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭
    Very interesting question - I did not realize how low the mintage of the S mints were from 2012...

    I think the dimes will retain their value over the long haul.

    But I will agree with others and say the quarters will out perform in the short run, but once the series is over I can see them declining.
    Awarded latest "YOU SUCK!": June 11, 2014
  • Options
    DavideoDavideo Posts: 1,364 ✭✭✭✭
    I think the fact that there is only a single a dime versus however many S quarters we end up with is in the dime's favor. But if I could predict the future I would be much wealthier.
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,163 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm doing the Nat'l Parks quarters from circulation, with a free Whitman folder I got.

    It's proving pretty challenging. They certainly don't seem to turn up as often as the Statehoods.

    I had a vague notion that the mintages were lower, but haven't really followed along that closely.

    I have gotten to the point where I can spot one straight off, even if it's obverse-up in the till. The relief looks very different.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    kiyotekiyote Posts: 5,627 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It could depend a lot on something as simple as what Dansco is going to do with their albums going forward...
    "I'll split the atom! I am the fifth dimension! I am the eighth wonder of the world!" -Gef the talking mongoose.
  • Options


    << <i>Which do you think is the better value?

    1996-W clad uncirculated dime.
    Price: about $13.
    Mintage: 1.45 million.

    2012-S clad uncirculated quarters.
    3 sets of all 5 designs. (Total: 15 coins.)
    Price: about $13.
    Mintage:
    El Yunque: 1.7 million.
    Other four: 1.4 million each. >>



    Still like the COPPER 2009 cents best
    Mintage: about 785000
    Price (8 coins): ~$12

  • Options
    OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,314 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>It could depend a lot on something as simple as what Dansco is going to do with their albums going forward... >>


    The Roosevelt dime albums I've seen advertised do not have a space for the 1996-W. So the 2012-S quarters are on equal footing in that respect.

    Another thing the 2012-S quarters have going for them is that some people collect them by Mint-issued 40-coin rolls and 100-coin bags, while the 1996-W dimes are collected only as singles. (They were only available in the 1996 Mint Sets, one coin per mint set.)

  • Options
    Each year that the USM offers the "S" Unc. ATB Quarters, there is a very likelyhood that Steve (Dansco) will include these scarce collectable coins in the company's future album/pages. As each new issue is offered by the USM, there is the good chance that new "S" Unc quarter customers come on board. The US econmoy appears to require more new, spendable quarters for commerce. Thus, more P/D Uncs. show up that will enable somemore quarter collectors to start collecting them. That is my take.........
    Specialized Investments
  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,433 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>It could depend a lot on something as simple as what Dansco is going to do with their albums going forward... >>


    The Roosevelt dime albums I've seen advertised do not have a space for the 1996-W. So the 2012-S quarters are on equal footing in that respect.

    Another thing the 2012-S quarters have going for them is that some people collect them by Mint-issued 40-coin rolls and 100-coin bags, while the 1996-W dimes are collected only as singles. (They were only available in the 1996 Mint Sets, one coin per mint set.) >>



    Ive got an album that has no slot for the 96W(no proof) and another(including proof) that does. My vote on the original question would be for the quarters simply due to higher collector demand and Im a roosevelt person!
  • Options
    razzlerazzle Posts: 998 ✭✭✭
    I'm with the quarter guys. I think the dime mintage was advertised as a low mintage in advance and were collected individually by those so minded. The quarter seems to have been some sort of publicized error resulting in a surprise low mintage for a very popular coin which has an even much more limited availability as a single because of the roll and bag collectors (as has been mentioned).
    Markets (governments) can remain irrational longer than an investor can remain solvent.
  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 39,737 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I'm doing the Nat'l Parks quarters from circulation, with a free Whitman folder I got.

    It's proving pretty challenging. They certainly don't seem to turn up as often as the Statehoods.

    I had a vague notion that the mintages were lower, but haven't really followed along that closely.

    I have gotten to the point where I can spot one straight off, even if it's obverse-up in the till. The relief looks very different. >>




    the obverse portrait of Washington is more like the 1932 original than the spagheti hair state quarters.
    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,163 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yeah, that's it, I guess. The Statehoods ARE rather spaghetti-haired, aren't they.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    HalfStrikeHalfStrike Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭
    These S unc quarters are sort of like the CC morgans of the ATB quarter series, once that is realized many will wish they had bought at mint prices. They are already a double for those that did and this is barely getting warmed up.
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,163 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I noticed the OP said "Uncirculated" and not proof.

    But I suppose these Uncirculated S-mints are issued only in sets and not for circulation?

    Won't do me much good, since I'm assembling my set strictly from the till at work.

    Maybe I'll buy some rolls from the credit union and see what I can find. But it's to be a "from change only" collection.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    illini420illini420 Posts: 11,598 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I like the 1996-W and have for awhile. After a few years of the uncirculated S-mint quarters being issued, and with 5 different each year, they'll be much less special... except for maybe the first year before people were looking for them. The 1996-W is a one-coin one-year deal and is pretty darn cool. The values of them would probably double or triple if they just put a darn spot for them in the Dansco!!
  • Options
    lordmarcovanlordmarcovan Posts: 45,163 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I too have found the '96-W dimes interesting, for a modern coin, but have never yet had one.

    Collector since 1976. On the CU forums here since 2001.

  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,106 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Depends on if it's going to a coin shop or the laundromat. A lot people want that dime by itself and a lot of collectors won't break up a set to put it into a series. The quarters on the other hand are a new "novelty" from the mint. Their time hasn't come yet and they serve an immediate economic need. So they are naturally worth more... but the collector base is "burnt out" on quarters. It was the statehood quarters that started the trend. Maybe San Fran can save the day. We will see if they can top the brass from Westpoint.
  • Options
    Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The way i look at it is you can buy a 96-W Dime for $10 to $12 bucks ea or a 'S' minted Quarter for $1 or $2 and lets see where it go's from here, You can get them on the cheep for now but for how long?Just crazy Type2 thinking.image


    Hoard the keys.
  • Options
    jmcu12jmcu12 Posts: 2,452 ✭✭✭
    With all this being said, what about the 2013-s mint Unc?

    Now that more people know about them, I wonder if they will suddenly take-off or if they will take the same path as the 2012's?
    Awarded latest "YOU SUCK!": June 11, 2014
  • Options
    LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I know I`m in the minority but I like the 96-W Dimes better for a couple of reasons.

  • Options
    The reported sales of 2013 S Unc White Mt. quarters stands at 756,500.....nothing to ignore as a alot of coins sold in less than 30 days. Comments....
    Specialized Investments
  • Options
    OverdateOverdate Posts: 7,314 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The reported sales of 2013 S Unc White Mt. quarters stands at 756,500.....nothing to ignore as a alot of coins sold in less than 30 days. Comments.... >>


    More "S" White Mountain quarters can be struck anytime during calendar 2013. If they've struck only 1.4 million so far, I think it's likely that more of them will be made.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file