Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

~ Tokens 4 Thursday... Post Some Exonumia ~

BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
1834 Andrew Jackson, Roman Bust, HT-6 / Low-4, R.2, Brass

Nice lustrous surfaces and original patina... Not dipped bright like so many others often seen.

Typical softly struck reverse centers due to the obverse high relief bust design and a minor rim clip @ 9 o'clock.

image
To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!

Comments

  • Options
    Army and Navy CWT.
    image
    image
    www.coinswithhistory.com
  • Options
    Steve27Steve27 Posts: 13,284 ✭✭✭
    image
    image
    "It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
  • Options
    ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wood 29 Canadian Blacksmith Copper hand struck on a 3.0 gram planchet. imageimage
  • Options
    What coin is that?
    www.coinswithhistory.com
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,968 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I purchased this at the FUN show, a Zachary Taylor Mexican War medal in bronze. this thing is massive as show in the third picture.

    image
    image

    image
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    SonorandesertratSonorandesertrat Posts: 5,695 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Is that Taylor/Buena Vista medal the one the John Kraljevich had?
    Member: EAC, NBS, C4, CWTS, ANA

    RMR: 'Wer, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen?'

    CJ: 'No one!' [Ain't no angels in the coin biz]
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,968 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Is that Taylor/Buena Vista medal the one the John Kraljevich had? >>



    Yes.

    I had had the Winfield Scott piece for quite a while and had been looking for a mate.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Was that created on the large screw press in the Philadelphia Mint?
  • Options
    LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,702 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image
    Gone but not forgotten: IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal, CoinsAreFun.
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,968 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Was that created on the large screw press in the Philadelphia Mint? >>



    If they struck that on a screw, I don't know what team of mules, horses or elephants would have pulled the levers. That one had to have been done on a steam powered press.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 35,968 ✭✭✭✭✭
    See if you can spot the differences between DeWitt numbers AJACK 1824-1 and AJACK 1824-2. Hint: it's on the reverse.

    AJACK 1824-1

    imageimage

    AJACK 1824-2

    imageimage

    Normally I would not buy two pieces that are so similar, but a dealer at FUN offered me the AJACK 1924-1 at a reasonable price.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    ambro51ambro51 Posts: 14,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The old medal press had a screw that was six inches in diameter. It had three threads with a pitch of three-inches. The lever at the top of the press had a length of thirteen feet, with each arm measuring six feet six inches from the center of the screw. At the end of each arm was an iron ball weighing about one hundred and fifty pounds. Applying the maximum force of both men, the screw rotated through two and one-half revolutions for a maximum travel of seven and one-half inches. The strength of the blow was equivalent to 250 tons or about 40 tons per square inch. A four inch diameter bronze medal might have required up to fifty blows to complete the design. The press required three men to operate it: one to place the planchets/blanks on the press between the dies, and two to swing the arms and duck as the arms rebounded.

    [Excerpt from book draft 14 of "From Mine to Mint."]
  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>See if you can spot the differences between DeWitt numbers AJACK 1824-1 and AJACK 1824-2. Hint: it's on the reverse. >>



    2 extra berries in the reverse wreath on the AJACK 1824-1 image
    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file