Options
Legend/Morphy October sale is now online

Nothing for me, but what do you think about the offerings?
TahoeDale
0
Comments
<< <i>Nothing for me, but what do you think about the offerings? >>
Nothing for me either and I didn't even see a single offering worth bothering to think about
Edited to add:
Actually quite disappointed with overall coin quality and image quality based on the hype...
As I was expecting some mega fresh mind blowers
<< <i>Nothing for me, but what do you think about the offerings? >>
Much more low end material than I was expecting, especially considering the small number of lots.
type2,CCHunter.
is it me, or the lighting, or ___ ? Does that DM MS70 First Spouse look like it has that copper discolorization some of the new .9999 gold gets?
do you think this stuff is possibly just the shelf-dustings that some dealers get where it is either deemed not worthy of time right now, or maybe meh, i'll sit this aside for later and then before you
know it years have passed by and there sits a small fortune in hundreds or perhaps thousands of coins worth quite a bit of money?
so what i am asking if is this is possibly stock-relief and will either continue this way or just to get the ball rolling.
and yes i did see a few coins that i am amazed were referred to as drek.
i'll post a few that seem nice until someone corrects me
1C 1793 CHAIN AMERICA XF DETAILS-TOOLED
20C 1876 PCGS PR65
10C 1939-D PCGS MS69FB - i'll admit, first 69 i think i've seen in a merc
50C 1917-D REVERSE PCGS MS64 - bidding started at half price or am i missing something?
$1 1881 TRADE PCGS PR65 CAMEO CAC.
and how about the average under $2k coins. are they better examples. ie not all m65 coins are equal for the grade?
just asking since i have no opinion at this point. i've given too many today and i am all opinionated out
.
I think it also illustrates how difficult it is to get great coins out of strong hands in numbers
MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
<< <i>The images look like scans from a $200 printer >>
i was thinking that but didn't say it
.
<< <i>Tough crowd! I just went through it for the first time and was actually quite pleased with the results. >>
Tradedollar- Will you list 5 or so coins you think are quite nice? I have yet to look at the offerings but would like to know a few that passes an experts muster. I would like to see if i spot those same coins as i browse thru the listings.
Thanks
NGC registry V-Nickel proof #6!!!!
working on proof shield nickels # 8 with a bullet!!!!
RIP "BEAR"
<< <i>
<< <i>Tough crowd! I just went through it for the first time and was actually quite pleased with the results. >>
Tradedollar- Will you list 5 or so coins you think are quite nice? I have yet to look at the offerings but would like to know a few that passes an experts muster. I would like to see if i spot those same coins as i browse thru the listings.
Thanks >>
What exactly do you mean by 'quite nice'? Do you mean nice for the grade or do you mean important coins? I have no idea on nice for the grade. As far as important coins, I'd say the chain cent, the DDO nickel, the 3 legged nickel, the gem proof trade dollar and the finest known proof double eagle all count. Not to mention two gem double dimes
<< <i>Well she did state upfront that the first auction was a work in progress. Clearly it is.
I think it also illustrates how difficult it is to get great coins out of strong hands in numbers
MJ >>
I agree, that's exactly what I was thinking
I also think most people do not know what's involved in getting something like that launched.
One cannot just hit the ground running, it takes time. I think it will be a very big success eventually......it just needs some time.
.
CoinsAreFun Toned Silver Eagle Proof Album
.
Gallery Mint Museum, Ron Landis& Joe Rust, The beginnings of the Golden Dollar
.
More CoinsAreFun Pictorials NGC
<<< Much more low end material than I was expecting >>>
<<< Actually quite disappointed with overall coin quality and image quality based on the hype >>>
<<< Sorry to say but this is like a 99% Dreck Wreck >>>
<<< do you think this stuff is possibly just the shelf-dustings that some dealers get >>>
Wow, apparently some here were expecting The Garrett Sale, maybe Norweb? No, there is no array of 1880 Coiled Hair Stellas, no 1825/4 $5.00 Gold, no 1793 Strawberry Leaf Large Cents, not even an 1870-S $3.00 Gold.
I think this sale actually has quite a few sharp looking coins, and I'm sure they will only get better as time goes on.
The PCGS trade n grade sales will consist of $2500 and up coins (limit 500 lots) and each will be true viewed (if PCGS)
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
<< <i>With all due respect, there are some really neat coins in this sale. Maybe what some would call "dreck" as well, but it looks like they were trying to put together a sale that would have some interest in all price ranges, not just the mega buck material. Not too bad for the first time out. Nothing for me here, but admittedly I have a rather narrow range of interest. Going forward I suppose one of the considerations will be whether or not to offer items which cover all kinds of material, or to concentrate on just the higher end coins. This is only conjecture of course on my part, as I have no idea what direction future auctions will take. Tough nut to crack, putting together a successful auction business. Whatever issues I may have had in the past with Laura and Bruce, I have to give them credit for at least giving it a shot. >>
I have to agree. Give them a little slack. I never bought a coin from Legend, but as a collector, I usually only target one or two coins in an auction. I saw several coins here that I would really like to see in person and potentially bid on.
Tom
This isn't their first attempt at auctions.
10C 1939-D PCGS MS69FB.
$1 1879-S PCGS MS67PL CAC.
$10 1915 NGC PR66.
$20 1911 PCGS PR66+ CAC.
<< <i>Sorry to say but this is like a 99% Dreck Wreck
This auction company permits bids to be placed by the auctioneer, an employee of the auctioneer, or the seller or an agent on the seller's behalf, even if such bids are placed solely for the purpose of increasing the bid
So Shill bidding is allowed by the auction company and seller who can see your max bid. They can bid up to your max bid to get you to pay more....NICE....
8 Reales Madness Collection
Some nice coins, just nothing I can use in my collection.
I'll keep checking.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Coin collecting is not a hobby, it's an obsession !
New Barber Purchases
I don't get it. But if you can explain to me how a consignor can see the bidders' max bids, I will become a regular consignor to these auctions!
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>So Shill bidding is allowed by the auction company and seller who can see your max bid. They can bid up to your max bid to get you to pay more
I don't get it. But if you can explain to me how a consignor can see the bidders' max bids, I will become a regular consignor to these auctions! >>
No the auction house can see the bids and place bids "for the sole purpose of increaseing the bid"
An altogether superficial response from someone who often finds himself at loggerheads with Laurie and her posse.
However:
1) I know of dealers who attempted to consign items to this auction and had them refused. Quality control is being attempted and the paradigm will continue to be refined. Would I have taken everything they did? No. So what....
2) Larger auction houses may want to present something for everyone. L-M is (my own surmise) trying to present an overall better-quality selection for some buyers, not trying to be all things to all people.
3) Amen to the Garrett sale comment.
And on the other other hand:
The images do seem to truly and deeply suck.
Having known Julie for 20+ years, I'll give major odds this particular, and particularly important, issue wiil not re-occur.
The Manichean dichotomy between PQ and PU has always been an unrealistic and simplistic artifact of an inability to view quality as a continuum. Maybe it's not just "I like it" and "dreck". Consider the intermediate quality levels (in grade) of "schlock" and "just-miss".
Holding you nose over a messed-up Chain Cent? EAC people understand the discriminants that affect value in this area.
Someone ingested mass quantities of proof WLHs and thought a small market test might help them better price some components of their purchases? Perhaps. Your problem with that is.....?
Someone wants to sell off coins that have gone past their inventory control sell-by date? You problem with that is....?
See any serious flaws? Stop whining here and e-mail L-M so complaints and suggested improvements can be considered and operationalized. Legend has always made intensive customer service a core value.
"Not a fan" has nothing to do with doing business and appreciating the positive components of a business plan.
<< <i>Check out the terms:
This auction company permits bids to be placed by the auctioneer, an employee of the auctioneer, or the seller or an agent on the seller's behalf, even if such bids are placed solely for the purpose of increasing the bid
So Shill bidding is allowed by the auction company and seller who can see your max bid. They can bid up to your max bid to get you to pay more....NICE.... >>
Yikes! Thanks for the warning. It sounds like there's nothing to prevent them from running up your bid to your maximum bid. No thanks.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
This language looks like it was "borrowed" from another auction firm, rather than drafted by L-M's attorneys. I say that because it is not unusual, especially at live auctions, for an auctioneer to start bidding at a level below the reserve, and then escalate bidding (with or without multiple bidders) up to the reserve. For example, this is SOP at Christies and Sothebys. However, given L-M's practice of starting auctions at the reserve price, and assuming that L-M does not plan to shill lots for greed or for sport, I wouldn't worry too much about this.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Any doilies??
I sure like the 1863 proof set!
well this just re-affirms i am in the right place. aside from negative comments, there are a lot of legitimate issues brought up and information being shared about how the auctions will be managed
unless things change i'll just say it is a nice but unfortunate eye-opener
.
This is an inaugural auction with a limited number of lots. I think of this as a trial run to get up and running and find out where the bugs are.
I don't know how many of you have tried to launch a new company but if you have you know it's almost impossible to get it perfect out of the gates. Everything needs to ramp up.
For the LM auctions associated with PCGS all lots will be valued at $2500 or more. The vast majority of the lots will be PCGS coins with TrueView photos.
In my opinion having another auction venue that features quality coins is a welcome addition to the market. I know the auctions will have a lot of financial support. If your interested in an alternative then you'll support these efforts. If you're content with the same old, same old, then that's your choice but don't knock someone for trying.
I'm looking through the lots with the intention of buying something.
Watch the nay-sayers brag about their great buys in this auction in the coming weeks.
Empty Nest Collection
<< <i>
<< <i>Check out the terms:
This auction company permits bids to be placed by the auctioneer, an employee of the auctioneer, or the seller or an agent on the seller's behalf, even if such bids are placed solely for the purpose of increasing the bid
So Shill bidding is allowed by the auction company and seller who can see your max bid. They can bid up to your max bid to get you to pay more....NICE.... >>
Yikes! Thanks for the warning. It sounds like there's nothing to prevent them from running up your bid to your maximum bid. No thanks. >>
BS and why are you so easily duped? I can't put it any better then Andy did.
MJ
Fellas, leave the tight pants to the ladies. If I can count the coins in your pockets you better use them to call a tailor. Stay thirsty my friends......
Anyone know where they got their estimated prices? Looking at the small cents, $1000 for a '77IHC in an NGC details holder is too high while $4500 for an '09 S-VDB in a OGH 65RD w/CAC is way too low. JMHO.
https://pcgs.com/setregistry/showcase/2819
<< <i>It's very easy to criticize a new venture. Let's see how the results play out and have a basis for opinion.
Anyone know where they got their estimated prices? Looking at the small cents, $1000 for a '77IHC in an NGC details holder is too high while $4500 for an '09 S-VDB in a OGH 65RD w/CAC is way too low. JMHO. >>
to be fair that is how the estimating game works, inflate the low ball stuff to impart the impression of value and undercut the choice stuff as it brings in bidders looking for a deal who then you hope get caught up in the action.
<< <i>See any serious flaws? Stop whining here and e-mail L-M so complaints and suggested improvements can be considered and operationalized. Legend has always made intensive customer service a core value. >>
Someone took one to many suck up pills today. Firstly, the thread was started asking for comments about the newest auction startup that had been hyped pretty heavily. If you don't want to see what people think climb in a hole somewhere until the auction is over.
I don't like the layout at all, just a long string of coins. Couldn't there be some organization that you could click on a buttong or text to show nickels, or dimes etc., sort of the way HA does thiers with the little sidebars. It's a small auction but still it would help.
I didn't think they would have anything of interest to me but I do look at some of the pieces on the legend web site and have read them constantly trashing anything that is not "PCGS/CAC only". I was pretty surprised, for example the 39D merc in 69FB doesn't have a sticker, why not? You'd think someone would sticker that to get maximum value. I don't even like stickers but would get it done before I tried to sell it. The 1916/16 buff is in the wrong holder and it doesn't have a sticker. These are exactly the type of coins they tell people not to buy.
World Collection
British Collection
German States Collection
<< <i>I sure like the 1863 proof set! >>