Home U.S. Coin Forum

Gold Experts - what do you think of this $2.50? OBV now posted.

DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,378 ✭✭✭✭✭
As to: Grade, Genuine or Fake, MS or Proof?

image
image
"Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)

Comments

  • DUIGUYDUIGUY Posts: 7,252 ✭✭✭
    Very clean. image
    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly."



    - Marcus Tullius Cicero, 106-43 BC
  • mozinmozin Posts: 8,755 ✭✭✭
    I can't suggest to counterfeit or genuine from your pictures. Maybe some gold counterfeit expert can.
    I collect Capped Bust series by variety in PCGS AU/MS grades.
  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A reverse looks too good to be true and it's not slabbed, my gut says whizzed.
    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • commoncents05commoncents05 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭


    << <i>A reverse looks too good to be true and it's not slabbed, my gut says whizzed. >>



    What? Nothing at all indicates the coin has been whizzed.

    -Paul
    Many Quality coins for sale at http://www.CommonCentsRareCoins.com
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>A reverse looks too good to be true and it's not slabbed, my gut says whizzed. >>


    Can't agree with the whizzed part, if it were it'd have some funky looking luster I'm not seeing. I wouldn't be surprised if it has been wiped before, but my first thought was that it is a proof.
  • Wolf359Wolf359 Posts: 7,663 ✭✭✭
    The protected area inside the shield doesn't appear polished so I'd guess no to a proof.

    But it has been wiped or something. The luster looks off.
  • stealerstealer Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭✭


    << <i>The protected area inside the shield doesn't appear polished so I'd guess no to a proof. >>



    Good point, never considered that as a place to look before. Thanks!
  • I don't see anything from the photographs that makes me suspect that the coin is counterfeit, but the luster appears off. I would guess that the coin has been polished and would receive a "details" grade or end up in a "genuine" holder.
  • DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,378 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Another question.....

    The very sharp edge of the rim from 9:00 to 1:00. Does this indicate a proof? Or is this 'sharpness' found on MS coins too?
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Another question.....
    The very sharp edge of the rim from 9:00 to 1:00. Does this indicate a proof? Or is this 'sharpness' found on MS coins too? >>


    it does not indicate a proof. it does however indicate a very strong strike and from my experience EDS coins. I've had mercs and rosies with that little bit going all the way around the edge/rim.

    based on seeing that, since you bring it up, makes me think the odds of this being a counterfeit are extremely low.

    will you show us the 1901 obverse?
    .

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,854 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Another question.....

    The very sharp edge of the rim from 9:00 to 1:00. Does this indicate a proof? Or is this 'sharpness' found on MS coins too? >>



    This is characteristic of counterfeits where the reeding was "broached" by pushing the coin through a cylindrical die to apply the reeding to the edge. I certainly wouldn't condem a coin based on a lousy pic but I would be hesitant to buy it without first performing an in-hand examination since there are too many fakes in this series.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • OnlyGoldIsMoneyOnlyGoldIsMoney Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nicely struck new reverse. If I had to guess we are looking at a 1896 or later coin based on strike.

    Luster looks odd but it may just be the photograph. I see no indications of counterfeit.
  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Can't tell good/bad from the picture, so I'll just say it looks like a PL business strike. There's some speckly color around STATES, so perhaps it hasn't been messed with. Just my first reaction, of course.
  • DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,378 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Obverse pic now posted.
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • jmski52jmski52 Posts: 23,266 ✭✭✭✭✭
    To this non-expert, it looks like a darned nice coin.
    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • LindeDadLindeDad Posts: 18,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I really think our hosts would send it back as Questionable Authenticity or Code 90.
    I'm no expert but something is just off to my viewing of the images shown.
    image
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,854 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I really think our hosts would send it back as Questionable Authenticity or Code 90.
    I'm no expert but something is just off to my viewing of the images shown.
    image >>



    Agree. The design elements look soft and not as sharp as what you would expect to see on an authentic coin.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,378 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks to SumoRada for providing a neat overlay of a PCGS ms64 1901 $2.50 and mine.

    Unfortunately for me, I think mine is a Fake.

    I'm looking especially at the '0' in the date and there's quite a difference.

    image
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,378 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Interestingly enough, there's a few slabbed 1901's with a very narrow '0' in the date, just like mine.

    This is an NGC Proof....

    image
    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
  • LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    .
    if we had better images of the coin, especially the fields, we could really offer great opinions

    it would really help if you posted links to the full original images, not cropped so we could enlarge them without much pixelation

    if you do that, make sure to set your camera to max resolution
    .

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,936 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Although the 1 of the date does go into the denticles, that is norm for some. But, the
    rest of the denticles below the date look out of shape. I say Fake. What is the diameter?

    bobimage
    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • segojasegoja Posts: 6,141 ✭✭✭✭
    My vote is fake. Just doesn't look right. Normally fakes look too good to be true, and this one strikes me that way.

    the stars on the obverse look weak as does much of the lettering on the reverse, especially the "N" in United.
    JMSCoins Website Link


    Ike Specialist

    Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986

    image
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,914 ✭✭✭✭✭
    heavy strike with mushy lettering?

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • LochNESSLochNESS Posts: 4,829 ✭✭✭
    If it weren't for DoubeEagle's NGC-authenticated example, I would've said the "0" meant fake. Now I'm not so confident. It's a valuable gold coin, if it's real, so I'd pay the submission fee and find out what the experts think.
    ANA LM • WBCC 429

    Amat Colligendo Focum

    Top 10FOR SALE

    image
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 35,914 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I don't know.... maybe it is the different photo resolutions.


    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,854 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Before you pay for the grading and round trip shipping and insurance fees, I'd show it to a few trusted dealers and get their opinion. Any possibility of getting some large high resolution pics?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,820 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>My vote is fake. Just doesn't look right. Normally fakes look too good to be true, and this one strikes me that way.

    the stars on the obverse look weak as does much of the lettering on the reverse, especially the "N" in United. >>



    I too vote fake. The rims and the denticles just don't look right. The reverse is more convincing that the obverse which might explain we started only with that. I don't own a 1901 quarter eagle, but here is a 1905 for comparison purposes.

    image
    image
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • DrBusterDrBuster Posts: 5,436 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Thanks to SumoRada for providing a neat overlay of a PCGS ms64 1901 $2.50 and mine.

    Unfortunately for me, I think mine is a Fake.

    I'm looking especially at the '0' in the date and there's quite a difference.

    image >>





    The zero 0 in yours looks like the inside is straight/oblong from the ones that look authentic with a true oval/egg shape.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file