Thoughts on the DMPL, or is it?

Comments

• Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

  July 17, 2012 7:16AM

  
  They grade it 64 DMPL, 64 is wrong but DMPL? Also, is that a dipping gone wrong or just wierd toning?

  0
• dragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭

  July 17, 2012 7:21AM

  That one appears to have seen the dip jar at least once or twice, and I would call the obv. a strong PL and the rev. not PL. Keep in mind that overdipping will destroy the mirrors with time, so that rev. may have had better PL qualities at one time.

  0
• Zoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭

  July 17, 2012 7:28AM

  
  
  << <i>That one appears to have seen the dip jar at least once or twice, and I would call the obv. a strong PL and the rev. not PL. Keep in mind that overdipping will destroy the mirrors with time, so that rev. may have had better PL qualities at one time. >>
  
  
  
  Will an overdipped coin's mirrors degrade in the holder?

  Private Mint News | 2010 Lincoln Reverse Finalists

  0
• dragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭

  July 17, 2012 7:35AM

  <<< Will an overdipped coin's mirrors degrade in the holder? >>>
  
  
  Yes they will.

  0
• TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭

  July 17, 2012 7:36AM

  DMPL?
  
  Obverse MAYBE
  Reverse NO
  
  

  

  0
• Zoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭

  July 17, 2012 7:41AM

  
  
  << <i><<< Will an overdipped coin's mirrors degrade in the holder? >>>
  
  
  Yes they will. >>
  
  
  
  Thanks. Good to know.

  Private Mint News | 2010 Lincoln Reverse Finalists

  0
• stealer Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭✭

  July 17, 2012 7:49AM

  Definitely not a 64 and it won't go even PL today either

  0