I generally like your taste Lloyd, but that Walker looks like it's got too much of that reddish brown- strike looks soft and I'm hoping the luster isn't muted.
Interesting, when I seen this coin on hold I figured it might have went to you. Sure enough. I don't take images as absolutes like many folks do. I can get a bit of a feel for how it may look. That said, I'm not seeing "Moose" on this one, as I don't on a lot that I see described as such. Glad you like it. Enjoy!
Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
<< <i>Interesting, when I seen this coin on hold I figured it might have went to you. Sure enough. I don't take images as absolutes like many folks do. I can get a bit of a feel for how it may look. That said, I'm not seeing "Moose" on this one, as I don't on a lot that I see described as such. Glad you like it. Enjoy! >>
no insult to the photographer was intended. just stating a coin like this is difficult to image properly to show how high quality it is .
<< <i>Interesting, when I seen this coin on hold I figured it might have went to you. Sure enough. I don't take images as absolutes like many folks do. I can get a bit of a feel for how it may look. That said, I'm not seeing "Moose" on this one, as I don't on a lot that I see described as such. Glad you like it. Enjoy! >>
no insult to the photographer was intended. just stating a coin like this is difficult to image properly to show how high quality it is . >>
Since you quoted me I will reply. I did say I don't take images as absolutes.
Please... Save The Stories, Just Answer My Questions, And Tell Me How Much!!!!!
While I like that kind of toning I also know there are many who won't like it. That same toning on a seated half would probably be construed as average/neutral to maybe even slightly negative because of the bifurcation/mottling of the toning. But it probably does show better in person. Is one quarter of the toning (brown/silver mottling) from a fingerprint? I'd probably love the coin too. But I've learned over the past few years of stickers and plusses that it no longer matters what I think.
<< <i>While I like that kind of toning I also know there are many who won't like it. That same toning on a seated half would probably be construed as average/neutral to maybe even slightly negative because of the bifurcation/mottling of the toning. But it probably does show better in person. Is one quarter of the toning (brown/silver mottling) from a fingerprint? I'd probably love the coin too. But I've learned over the past few years of stickers and plusses that it no longer matters what I think. >>
Actually,there are NO fingerprints at all on the coin,and thanks for all the positive comments!
Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
I have never seen anything quite like it in all my toning days of collecting. You sure do seem to find some really interesting and colorful coins, Lloyd.
<< <i>I have never seen anything quite like it in all my toning days of collecting. You sure do seem to find some really interesting and colorful coins, Lloyd.
>>
Yeah sort of a one of a kind Shamwow coin.
Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
Comments
peacockcoins
Your Title needed some rearrangement
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Many members on this forum that now it cannot fit in my signature. Please ask for entire list.
You done good and will not regret this purchase
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>The picture looks flat. I can imagine much of that brown pops into some color in hand? >>
yeah buddy
i think it may be undergraded. that camouflage toning is probably holding it back.
there is a pattern on some high-grade monsters i've noticed and it is scarce.
the toning on the reverse from 3-6 is a brown flaky type and a little on the obverse.
i've seen that toning on some 67-68 morgans, peace, comemms, mercs and a few other series
since your coin isn't imaged properly it probably won't get the attention it deserves
.
<< <i>.
i think it may be undergraded. that camouflage toning is probably holding it back.
there is a pattern on some high-grade monsters i've noticed and it is scarce.
the toning on the reverse from 3-6 is a brown flaky type and a little on the obverse.
i've seen that toning on some 67-68 morgans, peace, comemms, mercs and a few other series
since your coin isn't imaged properly it probably won't get the attention it deserves
. >>
Lance,You are absolutely right about that because it looks nicer than 67s and 68s i have seen in Walker holders!
I can get a bit of a feel for how it may look. That said, I'm not seeing "Moose" on this one, as I don't on a lot that I see described as such. Glad you like it.
<< <i>Interesting, when I seen this coin on hold I figured it might have went to you. Sure enough. I don't take images as absolutes like many folks do.
I can get a bit of a feel for how it may look. That said, I'm not seeing "Moose" on this one, as I don't on a lot that I see described as such. Glad you like it.
no insult to the photographer was intended. just stating a coin like this is difficult to image properly to show how high quality it is
.
<< <i>
<< <i>Interesting, when I seen this coin on hold I figured it might have went to you. Sure enough. I don't take images as absolutes like many folks do.
I can get a bit of a feel for how it may look. That said, I'm not seeing "Moose" on this one, as I don't on a lot that I see described as such. Glad you like it.
no insult to the photographer was intended. just stating a coin like this is difficult to image properly to show how high quality it is
. >>
Since you quoted me I will reply. I did say I don't take images as absolutes.
and the top half of the rev the best.
100% Positive BST transactions
From the coins you always post- Must be better in hand
bob
If you don't like that, I still care.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
be construed as average/neutral to maybe even slightly negative because of the bifurcation/mottling of the toning. But it probably
does show better in person. Is one quarter of the toning (brown/silver mottling) from a fingerprint? I'd probably love the coin too.
But I've learned over the past few years of stickers and plusses that it no longer matters what I think.
<< <i>While I like that kind of toning I also know there are many who won't like it. That same toning on a seated half would probably
be construed as average/neutral to maybe even slightly negative because of the bifurcation/mottling of the toning. But it probably
does show better in person. Is one quarter of the toning (brown/silver mottling) from a fingerprint? I'd probably love the coin too.
But I've learned over the past few years of stickers and plusses that it no longer matters what I think. >>
Actually,there are NO fingerprints at all on the coin,and thanks for all the positive comments!
and the top half of the rev the best.>>
Funny, that is what I was going to say.
<< <i>I have never seen anything quite like it in all my toning days of collecting. You sure do seem to find some really interesting and colorful coins, Lloyd.
Yeah sort of a one of a kind Shamwow coin.
I don't see a 66+ here??
"Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line."Jesus died for you and for me, Thank you,Jesus"!!!
--- If it should happen I die and leave this world and you want to remember me. Please only remember my opening Sig Line.Just foolin', love that coin.
http://www.coinshop.com