opinions on half dimes for my type set

I am currently trying to put together a 7070 type set. Money is an issue (recently married and first child) so I can not afford high grade US coins; I am trying to seek out VF to EFs for my collection. Recently I just purchased some half dimes and I would like to hear your opinions (if cleaned, grade, etc). I purchased them raw.
My guesses on grade are:
1853 - VF 30


1857 - F 12


1861 - EF 45


thanks
My guesses on grade are:
1853 - VF 30


1857 - F 12


1861 - EF 45


thanks
0
Comments
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
<< <i>It is difficult to me to determine what your white balance is on the coins, but the 1861 looks like it might have been cleaned. >>
I was thinking the same thing but for all of them. For their grades, they sure are free of any grime.
Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners.
<< <i>
<< <i>It is difficult to me to determine what your white balance is on the coins, but the 1861 looks like it might have been cleaned. >>
I was thinking the same thing but for all of them. For their grades, they sure are free of any grime. >>
good observation with the no grime for their grade, probably a fresh cleaning before being sold (a newbie mistake on my part) What grade would you give the details on the 1857? Low 20s?
nice affordable coins to put into a 7070
i've sold a lot of h10c to 7070/roll collectors
they are quite popular
.
HOWEVER all of them have extensive hairlines from cleaning and the resulting unnatural color. If these coins were to submitted to a reliable third party grader they end up in "genuine" holders or be net graded.
Here are two coins that illustrate my point.
At one time this 1838 half dime was a "filler" in my collection. Note the dull gray surfaces. The "color" that shows might have been from an attempt to re-tone it. This dull grayness is NOT an natural look.
This 1859 half dime is closer to the look you want for you type set. The surfaces do have some luster (Sorry I did not have strict EF example to show you.), and the surfaces don't have the large number of hairlines found on cleaned coins. I have not that this piece has been dipped at some point, but that is acceptable to most collectors.
BTW the reason have this is that it is a minor type with hollow areas inside the stars. The general shape of Ms. Liberty is also a little different, a little like a ship's bottom IMO. These dies where made by Anthony Paquet who was an assistant engraver at the mint. He designed some very nice medals, but he ran into trouble when he tried to make coin dies. The "Paquet reverse" 1861 double eagle was the most famous example.
As to the other issues, the prices you paid are lower than one would expect to pay for nice, original coins in EF. Believe it or not, the Gray Sheet wholesales prices are on the mark or a little low for really nice, original, no problem mid 19th century half dimes in EF. Since you want Choice VF to EF coins, these prices are closer to what you can expect plus some margin for the dealer. Here are the wholesale type coin numbers.
1853 with arrows $45 to $50
1857 stars obverse $42 to $46
1861 legend obverse $32 to $35
The worst buy you made was the 1861 because that piece has been cleaned with lots of hairlines, and would have a wholesale value of no more than $16 or so. (And that price is generious.)
What causes these hairlines? They are made when a coin is cleaned with an abrasive like baking soda or even the eraser on a pencil. The worst tool of all is a wire brush which results in what collectors call "whizzing." All of these half dimes have been cleaned with an abrasive of some sort. Removing anything from the surface of a coin requires great care or damage will result.
1853 VF details net Fine
1857 EF details net VF
1861 AU details net EF
at the prices you paid, you're allright, they have nice detail now and will look a lot better in 2022
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
My goal is to help the new collector recognize and avoid these types of problems in the future.
Even after those cleanings, the first 2 coins still show some luster....amazing. But give many years in an album, those might tone back a bit to dull the surfaces up.
It's time to visit a better mentor to prevent doing the same thing on much more expensive coins. You didn't get hurt too bad on these. These kinds of coins are sold
everyday by local shops for "problem-free" money (ie every day, collectors around the country are being taken). But you don't have to continue with that crowd if you
do a bit more diligence. And in many cases, this means avoiding your local shops. Most nearly everything they have in early type tends to be cleaned, scratched, corroded,
or played with. So it's no surprise that these 3 might look better than all the others they had. All those coins have more detail than the grade you assigned. But they also
have surfaces that are messed with that nets them down 1-2 grades. Determining orig surfaces on circ coins is not that hard. You'll be up to speed in no time. Try to look
for grey/brown/darkish/dirty seated coins with dirt in the devices. But stay away from blackish ones that may have seen a fire or greenish ones (corrosion). These 3 have that
too shiny silver/silver-grey look to them. And when the color is this even all across the coin, odds are they were helped along. Even on all orig light grey specimens the highpts
will either be lighter or darker than the rest of the coin. A uniform coloration is not the norm when you have a surface that wears unevenly. In the early 1970's my local dealer
sold me coins colored like this too. I thought I was getting a deal too.