Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

GTG.....27-S Buffalo....Grade Revealed

Trying to decide what to do with this coin. Looking for some opinions.

Excuse the poor photos.

Thanks for your input. Decision I'm trying to make is whether to attempt an upgrade. I hate to lose the OGH as I tend to favor them. The coin actually looks nicer in hand than as my photo presents. In hand the coin has very smooth, flashy, reflective surfaces. Not sure what the technical term would be, but similar to a brilliant proof with mirror like surfaces. I think I'll keep it as is, and maybe shoot for a green/gold bean for now.






Comments

  • Options
    lasvegasteddylasvegasteddy Posts: 10,492 ✭✭✭
    65 crowd here
    that's nice...very nice...great strike for that year
    everything in life is but merely on loan to us by our appreciation....lose your appreciation and see


  • Options


    << <i>65 crowd here
    that's nice...very nice...great strike for that year >>



    image
  • Options
    MICHAELDIXONMICHAELDIXON Posts: 6,765 ✭✭✭✭✭
    64
    Thanksgiving 2026 National Battlefield Coin Show November 27 & 28, 2026 at the Eisenhower Hotel Ballroom, Gettysburg, PA. No Early Bird passes for this show. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
  • Options
    keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,650 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will say 64/65............if it is not a 58...tough to tell from the lighting/photos.
    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Not really looking for much these days but if I were, it might be a toner. :smile:
  • Options
    ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,785 ✭✭✭✭
    64+
    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Options
    ModCrewmanModCrewman Posts: 4,055 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'd say 63 or 64...with 64 being my official vote.
  • Options
    bestclser1bestclser1 Posts: 5,566 ✭✭✭
    65 Buffalo
    Great coins are not cheap,and cheap coins are not great!
  • Options
    breakdownbreakdown Posts: 2,405 ✭✭✭✭✭
    64 and looks like a nice example of a tough date. Hits on forehead and cheek are limiting.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • Options
    pursuitoflibertypursuitofliberty Posts: 7,938 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I'm in the 64 with a shot higher camp, and it's a very nice looker ...

    but holey-moley, the strike for a 27-S is fantastic!

    Actually, I can not remember ever seeing a strike that full on a 27-S

    great coin! image

    “We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”

    Todd - BHNC #242
  • Options
    MacCrimmonMacCrimmon Posts: 7,058 ✭✭✭
    I hate trying to GTG on Buffs via images...........but since you asked!

    Looks like some friction on the Buffs front leg..........crack it and resubmit raw


    ....oh yeah, edited to add, it's in a 58 holder.
  • Options
    stealerstealer Posts: 4,042 ✭✭✭✭
    64 was my first thought
  • Options
    Tdec1000Tdec1000 Posts: 3,852 ✭✭✭
    AU 58
    Awarded the coveted "You Suck" Award on 22 Oct 2010 for finding a 1942/1 D Dime in silver, and on 7 Feb 2011 Cherrypicking a 1914 MPL Cent on Ebay!

    Successful BST Transactions!SIconbuster, Meltdown, Mission16, slothman2000, RGjohn, braddick, au58lover, allcoinsrule, commemdude, gerard, lablade, PCcoins, greencopper, kaz, tydye, cucamongacoin, mkman123, SeaEaglecoins, Doh!, AnkurJ, Airplanenut, ArizonaJack, JJM,Tee135,LordMarcovan, Swampboy, piecesofme, Ahrensdad,
  • Options
    buffnutbuffnut Posts: 935 ✭✭
    I see a hit on the buffalo's hip, but it's not wear. I'd say 64.
  • Options
    metalmeistermetalmeister Posts: 4,633 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Wow, Very nice!
    hmmm 64/65?
    email: ccacollectibles@yahoo.com

    100% Positive BST transactions
  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,563 ✭✭✭✭✭
    very tough call- I think it is MS- Just think it is not as high as we think 63

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options

    64 at best.PCGS is tough on 27-S Buffalos.I have seen better 27-S buff's,and many of them,in PCGS MS64 holders

    Everybody's got plans--until they get hit
    --Mike Tyson
  • Options
    DeepCoinDeepCoin Posts: 2,781 ✭✭✭
    I am guessing 63, but am notoriously bad at this series.
    Retired United States Mint guy, now working on an Everyman Type Set.
  • Options
    roadrunnerroadrunner Posts: 28,374 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lots of 65 qualities to that coin, esp. the strike. But PCGS is very tough on grading gem, key date S mints.

    I'd stay with MS64, but see no problem with 64+ either. Don't see it worse than 63 nor better than 65. 64 meets in the middle.
    Coloration on these is tuff as well. If you're wondering what to do with this then more likely you were assigned a lower grade than expected.
    If it's a liner coin that you've never been able to upgrade it's usually the case that the next hot dealer who handles it gets 'er done and pockets the booty.
    Barbarous Relic No More, LSCC -GoldSeek--shadow stats--SafeHaven--321gold
  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,997 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This coin looks familar, looks like the coin ron gergle owned for years.
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,799 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks AU58 to me
  • Options

    I don't think that coin will upgrade to a 64+. It's worth more in the OGH--keep it there.

    Everybody's got plans--until they get hit
    --Mike Tyson
  • Options

    Take a look at the 27-S in PCGS MS64,Cert. No. 24949703,that is coming up for sale in Heritage's Philadelphia Signature Auction,#1173,if
    you want to see how tough PCGS can be on a 27-S Buffalo

    Everybody's got plans--until they get hit
    --Mike Tyson

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file