opinions please
Looks like a minor doubled die to me? That's one fat 9:)
To me, mintmark position seems a little off to be FS101. But I agree that is a pretty fat '9', and does seem to be some evidence of doubling on the underside of the '5'.
@grip said: Looks like a minor doubled die to me? That's one fat 9:)
Agreed. Looks like a little bit of "notching" going on.
Pete
That's not it. Look at the mint mark placement on the real deal:
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia "Coin collecting for outcasts..."
It could be the pictures, however, I do not see doubling.... Or, it could be just my eyes... Cheers, RickO
Mintmark position is different. It is not the "official" IDO-001. Your comparison pictures are a great help, DCW.
@BuffaloIronTail said: Mintmark position is different. It is not the "official" IDO-001. Your comparison pictured are a great help, DCW. Pete
@BuffaloIronTail said: Mintmark position is different. It is not the "official" IDO-001. Your comparison pictured are a great help, DCW.
Well, it is referenced from a great site which I failed to give credit: www.coppercoins.com
It hasn't been updated in ages, but it is still a valuable resource
BIGDAVE
Posts: 1,764 ✭✭✭
Comments
Looks like a minor doubled die to me? That's one fat 9:)
To me, mintmark position seems a little off to be FS101. But I agree that is a pretty fat '9', and does seem to be some evidence of doubling on the underside of the '5'.
Agreed. Looks like a little bit of "notching" going on.
Pete
That's not it. Look at the mint mark placement on the real deal:
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."
It could be the pictures, however, I do not see doubling.... Or, it could be just my eyes... Cheers, RickO
Mintmark position is different. It is not the "official" IDO-001. Your comparison pictures are a great help, DCW.
Pete
Well, it is referenced from a great site which I failed to give credit:
www.coppercoins.com
It hasn't been updated in ages, but it is still a valuable resource
Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
"Coin collecting for outcasts..."