Home U.S. Coin Forum

Need help grading this 1962 dime

thisistheshowthisistheshow Posts: 9,386 ✭✭✭✭✭

This is my first post. Also my first time taking coin pics and don't think I did very well.
Please let me know if I should try to take some better ones.
I'm looking for some feedback on this 1962 Roosevelt.

Thanks

Comments

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,800 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Keep working on the pics.

    Can't tell from the ones posted. Toned MS is all.
    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Timbuk3Timbuk3 Posts: 11,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Welcome !!! :)

    Timbuk3
  • thisistheshowthisistheshow Posts: 9,386 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thank you for the welcome.
    And yes, I will work on my pics until they are better and then try again.

  • StoogeStooge Posts: 4,668 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Roosies are my series. From these photos, I would say the obverse is a 65/66 and the reverse looks, from these pics which aren't the greatest, an AU58.

    Welcome to the forum. Glad to have you here.


    Later, Paul.
  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 33,473 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Focus
    Lighting

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What @Stooge said.

  • thevolcanogodthevolcanogod Posts: 270 ✭✭✭

    Look up axial lighting and work on that technique - will help with toned coins.

  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @thisistheshow .... Welcome aboard.... cannot tell much from the pictures, and are the 'marks' on the reverse on the coin? Dirt or dings? Cheers, RickO

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,309 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks AU or low MS. to the boards!

  • TomBTomB Posts: 21,440 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I believe that is a proof striking with some toning. The lighting is poor enough that I am not certain if it has acquired some highpoint wear or not, but either way it is still a proof.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • ilikemonstersilikemonsters Posts: 767 ✭✭✭✭

    Proof 66

  • thisistheshowthisistheshow Posts: 9,386 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I tried getting a better image, but currently using my phone, and there is no auto focus plus other issues. I'll refrain from wasting anyone's time with more pics until I get a better setup.
    I appreciate the comments. The marks on the reverse are actually just the toning.
    I never paid much attention to proof Roosevelts, but I love the way the blue just splashes across this one. I am thinking I might have to look for some more, because this one certainly has potential for a $2 purchase.

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a toned proof Roosie (and not attractively toned either) in rather low grade.
    Worth bullion value, realistically.
    Welcome aboard @thisistheshow .
    There is a LOT to learn....just keep reading, looking at coins, and looking at coins, and reading, and looking at coins and reading. :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file