Order Received 1-2-18. Grades Posted 2-22-18. Appears that my eyes are shot..
Fairlaneman
Posts: 10,426 ✭✭✭✭✭
It looks like my eyes are shot. I will be taking a leave from sending coins in.
Order Details
1 1 34930900 4912 1917-D 10C AU58 USA . Thought it was MS and FB
2 1 34930901 4916 1918 10C MS64 USA . Thought it was FB
3 1 34930902 4948 1925 10C AU55 USA . Just shucks.
4 1 34930903 4958 1926-S 10C Genuine AU Details (98 - Damage) USA . Knew this would be like this. Wanted tough date in a PCGS slab.
5 1 34930904 4964 1927-S 10C AU55 USA . Shucks again. Thought atleast AU58
6 1 34930905 4978 1930 10C MS65 USA . Needed a 66 out of this one.
7 1 34930906 4996 1935-S 10C MS64 USA. OK with this.
8 1 34930907 5062 1945-S 10C Micro S MS64 USA . OK with this. Color coin.
Ken
0
Comments
.
sliders can be a tough racket. many slabbed ms i see with (imo) high point friction/wear and au55/58 with apparently none.
there was a thread with some of this type of discussion recently.
a few nice coins in that order.
.
It's tough out there right now!
If I had a Dime for every time I (fill it in)
The above applies in many different ways for a poor person like me.
Pete
This probably reflects a tightening of "market grading" that takes place as a market slowly shrinks. Buyers become more and more selective.
What was that old refrain?? 'If the grades don't fit, you must resubmit.'....Well, not really... Let us know if, after reflection, you agree with the results.... Cheers, RickO
Tough results
. You seemed to have pretty good overall luck on your other merc dime submissions that you posted recently. I'm interested to see pictures of the coins when you get them back! Thanks for sharing and the info @Fairlaneman