Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1957 Lincoln Wheat Cent

Here is another one, i had tucked in a sleeve.
This wheat cent is in spectacular condition, canr believe I had it. Also does it seem like it has doubling on the year.

Comments

  • Options
    JBKJBK Posts: 17,631 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see a die chip and maybe some MD or die erosion.

    I am not up on the die varieties of Lincoln cents - is there a known DD for this date/MM? If not, then the chances of finding one (the first one) are pretty much zero. A die with doubling would have been used to strike many thousands of cents, one or more of which would have been discovered many years ago.

    On the other hand, if 57D has a known variety with doubling of the date then congratulations!

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,206 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There appears to be a die chip on the "5". The coin looks like it has been polished,

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,093 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good to see people are still searching. That's promising and instills hope.

  • Options
    BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

    In 1957 mint marks were punched into the die by hand. This is after the die was made. When you see doubling on the mintmark AND the coin itself it is usually Machine Damage Doubling.

    A good example of this is the 1969-S Cent.

    Notice how the devices are doubled but not the mintmark.

    Hope this helps.............

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • Options
    JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Machine doubling is a funny thing. Sometimes very hard to explain why
    it effects some areas of a coin and not others, but machine doubling
    is not a true doubled die or a hub doubled die.
    Look at this 57D I have as as example.

    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"
  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JRocco....That is a unique and extreme example of machine doubling... certainly a keeper, thanks for sharing that one. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    BobSavBobSav Posts: 937 ✭✭✭

    @JRocco said:
    Machine doubling is a funny thing. Sometimes very hard to explain why
    it effects some areas of a coin and not others, but machine doubling
    is not a true doubled die or a hub doubled die.
    Look at this 57D I have as as example.

    I agree, given the mechanics of a one piece die striking a piece of metal it's hard to imagine how that happens.
    Bob

    Past transactions with:
    Lordmarcovan, WTCG, YogiBerraFan, Phoenin21, LindeDad, Coll3ctor, blue594, robkoll, Mike Dixon, BloodMan, Flakthat and others.
  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JRocco said:
    Machine doubling is a funny thing. Sometimes very hard to explain why
    it effects some areas of a coin and not others, but machine doubling
    is not a true doubled die or a hub doubled die.
    Look at this 57D I have as as example.

    Excellent example.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file