Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

18.11 Bust 50c

logger7logger7 Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭✭✭

I picked this Bust half up recently, not great images from a scanner:

Is there much of a story behind why they did the overdate like that?

Comments

  • Options
    ldhairldhair Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not a bad image for a scanner.

    Larry

  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 5, 2017 10:30PM

    @logger7 said:
    I picked this Bust half up recently, not great images from a scanner:

    Is there much of a story behind why they did the overdate like that?

    This overdate, often called the "punctuated date," is from one of two die marriages (O.102 is the other). Look closely and you can see much of the 0 under the 3rd 1. There is a bold die dot between 8 and 1. And depending on who you believe the fragment between the two 1's is either from another nick in the die or it is what is left over from the earlier 1.

    In general the strike is just fine on these overdates but the relief is usually not as good as the yeardates due to lapping. Stars are always weak on the left obverse of the O.101 and, oddly, just the opposite on the O.102, same die.
    Lance.



  • Options
    rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lkeigwin.... Thanks for the information, an interesting coin. Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 21, 2018 6:44AM

    Thanks for sharing that Lance.

    A little better set of images, looks like a XF:

  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,713 ✭✭✭✭✭

    NGC graded the coin VF details, improperly cleaned.

  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Another learning experience. Thanks.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file