MEXICAN CHARLES IV (BUST OF CHARLES III) 8 REALES, (1789-1790) TRANSITIONAL SET

Boosibri

With the recent CRO EB I completed a cool little three coin set of transitional Charles IV 8 Reales with the legend of Charles III.

1789-MO 8R Charles IV portrait of Charles III

1790-MO Charles IV Portrait of Charles III

1790-MO Charles IIII Portrait of Charles III. Note the IIII vs. IV. Finest graded for the transitional of any date last I checked but that doesn't;t really mean too much with all of the ungraded coins. That said, I've never seen of a nicer coin for the date.

bronzemat

Very nice set!

Abuelo

Very nice!

TwoKopeiki

Nicely done!

coinhack

I have seen a lot of Charles IIII coins but not Charles IV. Very nice.

MilkmanDan

Nice job filling out the trio! Now go update your registry set so you can pass me and move into the #1 slot already.

For some reason I've always looked at it as a 4 coins set, but totally understand why PCGS draws the line on the other side of the 1789 Carlos III. Here's the coin in question, to round out the 4. One of my personal favorite coins!

Yorkshireman

Nice

Boosibri

I like the 1789-MO Charles III @OriginalDan. We should have it added to the transitional set on the registry. I need to cross the new 1789 to PCGS. N55, looks like a P53.

MilkmanDan

@Boosibri said:
I like the 1789-MO Charles III @OriginalDan. We should have it added to the transitional set on the registry. I need to cross the new 1789 to PCGS. N55, looks like a P53.

The problem is that it’s already part of the CIII set which also makes sense. Registry aside, my point was that when I think of the transitional coins the group seems incomplete without including the normal CIII.

asheland

Awesome!

TwoKopeiki

@OriginalDan said:

@Boosibri said:
I like the 1789-MO Charles III @OriginalDan. We should have it added to the transitional set on the registry. I need to cross the new 1789 to PCGS. N55, looks like a P53.

The problem is that it’s already part of the CIII set which also makes sense. Registry aside, my point was that when I think of the transitional coins the group seems incomplete without including the normal CIII.

It's a nice problem to have! Or your can always go with this little set

MilkmanDan

@TwoKopeiki said:

@OriginalDan said:

@Boosibri said:
I like the 1789-MO Charles III @OriginalDan. We should have it added to the transitional set on the registry. I need to cross the new 1789 to PCGS. N55, looks like a P53.

The problem is that it’s already part of the CIII set which also makes sense. Registry aside, my point was that when I think of the transitional coins the group seems incomplete without including the normal CIII.

It's a nice problem to have! Or your can always go with this little set

Now we're talking! Only problem is that nice examples of these coins have totally dried up over the past few years.

Abuelo

@TwoKopeiki said:

@OriginalDan said:

@Boosibri said:
I like the 1789-MO Charles III @OriginalDan. We should have it added to the transitional set on the registry. I need to cross the new 1789 to PCGS. N55, looks like a P53.

The problem is that it’s already part of the CIII set which also makes sense. Registry aside, my point was that when I think of the transitional coins the group seems incomplete without including the normal CIII.

It's a nice problem to have! Or your can always go with this little set

Very nice set!

PatAR

Beautiful coins!

MattTheRiley

Just beautiful! Got any spares in PCGS AU grades you'd consider selling?

Boosibri

@MattTheRiley said:
Just beautiful! Got any spares in PCGS AU grades you'd consider selling?

Thanks! I already sold all but the MS62.

MattTheRiley

@Boosibri said:

@MattTheRiley said:
Just beautiful! Got any spares in PCGS AU grades you'd consider selling?

Thanks! I already sold all but the MS62.

Boo! lol

fluffy155

Yep I bought that first 1790 from you... still one of my favorite portrait 8Rs!