Home U.S. Coin Forum

Are these too good to qualify for Po 1 grade?

Picked these up for $7 a piece earlier. Great find for under melt! However I am wondering, are these too good to qualify for a Po 1 grade? Thanks!

Comments

  • SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great price!....

    I'd say they're dang close to 1

  • ZoinsZoins Posts: 34,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 5, 2017 12:20AM

    These are too good to be PO-01 coins.

    Here's a FR-02 with less detail than yours.

    Here are some PO-01s, though some look undergraded!

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,411 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 5, 2017 5:35AM

    My opinion:

    Should be no such thing as grade PO-1 or FR-2. For coins in the condition as seen in this thread the potential for wearing the piece by ARTIFICIAL means is great and makes a number assignment essentially meaningless.

    Lowest number possible from a grading service for a coin should be AG-3. I propose "melting pot escapee" as the proper designation for coins such as seen here if owner insists on getting the pieces slabbed. A meeting of the minds from the grading service majors (ANACS,ICG,NGC,PCGS) is in order to solve the slicker grading problem once and for all.

    OP coins are AG-3's.

    :)

    Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.

  • CascadeChrisCascadeChris Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The op coins are AG3

    The more you VAM..
  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Way too good for PO-1. Look like AG to me.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would say AG3 from the pictures.... Some of these PO1 coins look as if they have spent time in a vibratory shell cleaner... does it quickly....That being said, (and I know collecting is about personal likes/dislikes), I will never understand the attraction to low grade coins. JMO....Cheers, RickO

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Agree with AG03

  • CascadeChrisCascadeChris Posts: 2,529 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ricko said:
    I would say AG3 from the pictures.... Some of these PO1 coins look as if they have spent time in a vibratory shell cleaner... does it quickly....That being said, (and I know collecting is about personal likes/dislikes), I will never understand the attraction to low grade coins. JMO....Cheers, RickO

    Oh ricko, always the "cheery" pessimist :joy:

    The more you VAM..
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CascadeChris.... I am the incurable optimist.... :D Cheers, RickO

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 9,031 ✭✭✭✭✭

    When in doubt spin the wheel and submit....

  • ColonelJessupColonelJessup Posts: 6,442 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My tastes run to higher quality and rarity, but I still carry a singular regret for not buying an 1904 $20 in an old ANACS cache graded P01 for $1065 when spot was maybe $1050. Would have been a Poor Man's score, but, by today's standards, it would surely have upgraded, so would have been virtually worthless. :*

    "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - Geo. Orwell
  • goldengolden Posts: 9,995 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a 3 .

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file