My 1916 walker has a sister!

clarkbar04 · May 23, 2017 4:36PM

These 2 look so much the same, the could be twins if not separated by 1 year. Stunning luster and very clean!

The difference is this 1917 version had a much better life in the bag than the 1916.

I posted the 1916 before, it was recently graded MS64 by our host which is due to some of the larger marks and the graze across the sun. It features 66 eye appeal.

My pic

Trueview

New 1917 walker

Walkerguy21D · May 23, 2017 4:55PM

Nice stuff!!

crazyhounddog · May 23, 2017 5:21PM

I've said it before and I'll say it again. You have a SUPERB eye for picking these off the Bay. I'm more impressed with what you can accomplish with such a refined eye that I can tell you.
You have a gift.
Congratulations my friend.

CommemKing · May 23, 2017 5:37PM

Boy the strikes on the early walkers sure are strong compared to the later years.

golden · May 23, 2017 8:21PM

Very nice!

Kccoin · May 23, 2017 9:09PM

Full thumbs up sweet walkers!

Kyle · May 23, 2017 9:32PM

Those two will look very nice together.

Unknown · May 23, 2017 9:33PM

This content has been removed.

clarkbar04 · May 23, 2017 9:46PM

@AllCoinsRule said:
I thought it was going to be a sister from San Francisco.

Got one of those too, i also bought it raw.

ricko · May 24, 2017 4:44AM

Beautiful Walkers.... Truly an All American coin... I really wish our modern coinage could reflect such artistry. Cheers, RickO

291fifth · May 24, 2017 5:03AM

Very nice coins. I really like the 1916 thru 1933 Walkers in high grade. I suspect it is because I saw so few of them in circulation back in the days when they still circulated. Most of the early walkers were well worn by the time the 1960's arrived. I can recall finding exactly one nice AU early Walker, a 1917, when searching coins from circulation.