Home Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum

Did I just score the find of the century?!

Went thrift shopping with my girlfriend and found these signed Nikes for $20. Yes $20 for the pair

They're Kobe Bryant shoes but I'm not sure if it's his signature so maybe someone can help me here

It would be an awesome find if they were real but I've never seen a Kobe signature similar to this.

It makes me wonder though, if they are fake, wouldn't the faker try and make it look exactly like a previous sig he's done and there are too many variations with the two sigs on both shoes which means they were quickly done (like a real sig), not meretriciously done as a faker would.

I am thinking of spending money to take it to Beckett to have their opinion but I live in Australia and shipping cost will be costly so just want to know if it's worth it

Comments

  • sushihotwingssushihotwings Posts: 452 ✭✭✭

    Color me skeptical, but I have a hard time imagining how authentic signed Kobe Bryant shoes ended up in a thrift store in Australia. Save the money on the shipping and grading. Others can hopefully chime in on the signature.

    On the hunt high grade Star Basketball.
  • dowdydowdy Posts: 6

    I've got Manny Pacquiao and Oscar Dela Hoya boxing gloves signed and PSA authenticated and I don't think any of those two have come to Australia. (bought over internet) but hopefully others here can shine light on it

  • totallyraddtotallyradd Posts: 941 ✭✭✭✭

    What year is that model from? Athletes change signatures occasionally maybe it's an early signature? I have no prior knowledge on Kobe's signature though. Just throwing the idea out there.

  • byronscott4everbyronscott4ever Posts: 932 ✭✭✭

    Signature does not look like any I've seen from Kobe

  • mlbfan2mlbfan2 Posts: 3,115 ✭✭✭

    @dowdy said:
    It makes me wonder though, if they are fake, wouldn't the faker try and make it look exactly like a previous sig he's done and there are too many variations with the two sigs on both shoes which means they were quickly done (like a real sig), not meretriciously done as a faker would.

    Maybe the faker decided to autograph them as a joke before he donated them.

  • initialDinitialD Posts: 1,624 ✭✭✭

    Looks badly forged
    All four "B"s are different

  • ClockworkAngelClockworkAngel Posts: 1,994 ✭✭✭

    It was worth the gamble to pick them up for $20. Hope you get lucky, but it's a longshot

    The Clockwork Angel Collection...brought to you by Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Chase
    TheClockworkAngelCollection
  • muffinsmuffins Posts: 469 ✭✭✭

    not the find of the century either way.

    best of luck though.

  • dowdydowdy Posts: 6

    Thanks for the replies.
    Fake or not, the shoes itself are worth at least $150, since they're still brand new so still a good find nevertheless

  • travis ttravis t Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭

    I couldn't tell you if those are real sigs or not. I don't claim to be an expert. But I will claim that this board has never, ever, NEVER - until now - seen or used the word "meretriciously". I'd bet my entire collection on it. Well done. Thunderous applause.

  • those could be koby shoes when he toured japan - that would be why they ended in Australia

  • Panama Mutiny  (Formerly lawyer05) Panama Mutiny (Formerly lawyer05) Posts: 2,193 ✭✭✭✭
    edited May 18, 2017 6:17AM

    signature looks good, but its far from the find of the century. The find of the century would be ............ (respond below)

  • detroitfan2detroitfan2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭✭
    edited May 18, 2017 7:21AM

    @travis t said:
    I couldn't tell you if those are real sigs or not. I don't claim to be an expert. But I will claim that this board has never, ever, NEVER - until now - seen or used the word "meretriciously". I'd bet my entire collection on it. Well done. Thunderous applause.

    Does this count (see second post from the bottom): https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/8242786#Comment_8242786

  • travis ttravis t Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭

    Must I clarify? Ok, this board, as declared in my prior post, would essentially refer to the plethora of sports geeks who enjoy discussing the exploration, identification, authentication......and quite often the permutation of cards and memorabilia related to the endeavors of athletes, be they professional or otherwise.

    The U.S. Coin Forum is a completely different universe within a universe and pertains to the efforts of people who are rather strange and contorted. While I do agree that there are occasional crossover collectors with misfired brain matter (Grote15, I'm talking to you), the submission of a post from a foreign society does not qualify. You may not have my collection detroitfan2.

    But thank you for giving it the ol' college try. ;)

  • CakesCakes Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @travis t said:
    I couldn't tell you if those are real sigs or not. I don't claim to be an expert. But I will claim that this board has never, ever, NEVER - until now - seen or used the word "meretriciously". I'd bet my entire collection on it. Well done. Thunderous applause.> @detroitfan2 said:

    @travis t said:
    I couldn't tell you if those are real sigs or not. I don't claim to be an expert. But I will claim that this board has never, ever, NEVER - until now - seen or used the word "meretriciously". I'd bet my entire collection on it. Well done. Thunderous applause.

    Does this count (see second post from the bottom): https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/8242786#Comment_8242786

    Travis, you big word usage finally caught up to you.....lol. Well played Detroit fan.

    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • CakesCakes Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Cakes said:

    @travis t said:
    I couldn't tell you if those are real sigs or not. I don't claim to be an expert. But I will claim that this board has never, ever, NEVER - until now - seen or used the word "meretriciously". I'd bet my entire collection on it. Well done. Thunderous applause.> @detroitfan2 said:

    @travis t said:
    I couldn't tell you if those are real sigs or not. I don't claim to be an expert. But I will claim that this board has never, ever, NEVER - until now - seen or used the word "meretriciously". I'd bet my entire collection on it. Well done. Thunderous applause.

    Does this count (see second post from the bottom): https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/8242786#Comment_8242786

    Travis, you big word usage finally caught up to you.....lol. Well played Detroit fan.

    Travis pushed all in and Detroit fan called. Now they are asking for a ruling.

    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • muffinsmuffins Posts: 469 ✭✭✭

    if that doesnt, heres one from the bst - sports...and shes a beaut at that:

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/1936195#Comment_1936195

  • CakesCakes Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good lord now that is a mega rant.

    Successful coin BST transactions with Gerard and segoja.

    Successful card BST transactions with cbcnow, brogurt, gstarling, Bravesfan 007, and rajah 424.
  • jdip9jdip9 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭

    Dowdy - It's not often I have to Google the definition of a word I read on a message board. You made me a little bit smarter today, thanks.

  • glad to see I gave you an English lesson lol

  • detroitfan2detroitfan2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭✭

    @travis t said:
    Must I clarify? Ok, this board, as declared in my prior post, would essentially refer to the plethora of sports geeks who enjoy discussing the exploration, identification, authentication......and quite often the permutation of cards and memorabilia related to the endeavors of athletes, be they professional or otherwise.

    The U.S. Coin Forum is a completely different universe within a universe and pertains to the efforts of people who are rather strange and contorted. While I do agree that there are occasional crossover collectors with misfired brain matter (Grote15, I'm talking to you), the submission of a post from a foreign society does not qualify. You may not have my collection detroitfan2.

    But thank you for giving it the ol' college try. ;)

    I pretty much figured that and I can't say I disagree with your assessment!

  • detroitfan2detroitfan2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭✭

    @muffins said:
    if that doesnt, heres one from the bst - sports...and shes a beaut at that:

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/comment/1936195#Comment_1936195

    To be fair, I'm not sure the word "meretriciously" appears in that post? And whatever happened to Chaz?

  • travis ttravis t Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭

    This is some fun. You might be better off without my collection, anyways. What would you do with 100,000+ 1989 Upper Deck baseball commons? Build a sundeck? Maybe I should have mentioned that in my earlier post.....everything else I've got laying around here - in the technical classification - is inventory. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :p

  • detroitfan2detroitfan2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭✭

    What would you do with 100,000+ 1989 Upper Deck baseball commons?

    What I would do with 100,000+ 1989 Upper Deck baseball commons is double my collection size of 1989 Upper Deck baseball commons . . .

  • muffinsmuffins Posts: 469 ✭✭✭

    @travis t said:
    This is some fun. You might be better off without my collection, anyways. What would you do with 100,000+ 1989 Upper Deck baseball commons? Build a sundeck? Maybe I should have mentioned that in my earlier post.....everything else I've got laying around here - in the technical classification - is inventory. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. :p

    it doesnt matter what was in your collection.

    just knowing it used to be yours will provide us w/ hours of entertainment...

  • OddRodzOddRodz Posts: 645 ✭✭✭

    In person auto's only, else, false. Not getting why people in this day and age of electricity still buy non in person autos. This concern though, compared to thinking about what the deal was prior to the big bang and how long it took the final black hole to suck up all other black holes to where the mass of the main black hole condensed itself enough to finally big bang and provide us all this ability to still buy fake auto's, really freaks me out. What then was before the big bang ?

  • bishopbishop Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭

    shebang

    Topps Baseball-1948, 1951 to 2017
    Bowman Baseball -1948-1955
    Fleer Baseball-1923, 1959-2007

    Al
  • travis ttravis t Posts: 1,185 ✭✭✭

    Oh wait. K-Mart sets. Gobs of them. You can have those, too.

  • muffinsmuffins Posts: 469 ✭✭✭

    K.

  • MooseDogMooseDog Posts: 1,946 ✭✭✭

    Kobe Bryant rarely, if ever, signed his last name and the handwriting on the shoes doesn't come close to resembling anything Kobe would have written in the years the shoe was manufactured. Save your money, no trusted authenticator will pass that signature.

  • 1980scollector1980scollector Posts: 2,036 ✭✭✭

    I would check with Reed from BBCE.

    ** Working on the following sets-2013 Spectra Football Hall of Fame 50th Anniversary Autograph set, 2015 Spectra Football Illustrious Legends Autograph set, 2014-15 Hall of Fame Heroes autograph set. **
  • detroitfan2detroitfan2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭✭

    @travis t said:
    Oh wait. K-Mart sets. Gobs of them. You can have those, too.

    Next you're going to tell me you have a bunch of 1981 Topps Scratch-offs! We may have the exact same collections.

Sign In or Register to comment.