Home U.S. Coin Forum

Help with 1929-S "2 feather" Buffalo nickels

I was getting ready to list a roll of circ '29-S Buffalo nickels when I found what may be 3 coins that fall under the "2 feather" heading. 2 of them I'm fairly certain are indeed the 2 feather variety but the one (2nd coin) has either a hint of feather or maybe a die clash or maybe both? I see people listing coins with this hint of a feather as "2 feather" coins and then others calling them 2 1/2 feathers but not sure at what point it is a 2 feather and what point it's not.
Anyway, thanks in advance for the help.


Comments

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,484 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Check this out.

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • TequilaDaveTequilaDave Posts: 271 ✭✭✭

    @BuffaloIronTail said:
    Check this out.

    So if I'm not mistaken, all 3 would qualify?

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,484 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks that way. Good Luck!

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • TequilaDaveTequilaDave Posts: 271 ✭✭✭

    @BuffaloIronTail said:
    It looks that way. Good Luck!

    Pete

    Thanks, Pete. Now dumb question #2 - it seems there's not a lot of graded examples of this variety. Is that because it's fairly common and not worth of being slabbed or ?

  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's an excerpt from my book on the subject. The dividing line is kind of vague between a 2 feather and a 2 1/2 and different people probably have different standards. It's very subjective and nearly impossible to quantify. For those who wish to collect these I always recommend just sticking to the "true" 2 feather dates, none of which show a noticeable remnant of the third feather and of which there are 19 different years. Yours looks like it might qualify as a 2 feather. But in that grade it would be worth maybe $25 tops so the costs associated with slabbing it wouldn't be justified. In that grade it isn't overly rare. I would say that only a couple of the rarest dates would be worth slabbing in any grade below XF or so.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @koynekwest
    I think I see traces of the feather on two of them. Care to look again?

  • BuffaloIronTailBuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,484 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sorry about not mentioning you, Ron. My bad.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • EXOJUNKIEEXOJUNKIE Posts: 1,618 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The middle (second) one doesn't look to me like it would qualify -- too much third feather IMO.

    I'm addicted to exonumia ... it is numismatic crack!

    ANA LM

    USAF Retired — 34 years of active military service! 🇺🇸
  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 13,991 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes all three are qualifiers.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • OnWithTheHuntOnWithTheHunt Posts: 1,235 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 17, 2017 12:50PM

    1 and # 3 are maybes. To my eye, #2 would have a hard time even being called a 2-1/2 feathers. An acetone bath may remove some of the accumulated debris behind the neck, which might make the feather fragments less noticeable. 1929-S is one of the dates for which true 2-feathers are known, so koynekwest's advice should heeded.

    (no idea why this is printing out so big)

    Proud recipient of the coveted "You Suck Award" (9/3/10).
  • koynekwestkoynekwest Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No prob, Pete.

  • ad4400ad4400 Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭✭✭

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file