**GRADE REVEALED!** My first ever GTG. NOT my coin!! Very pretty1834 CBH up for playing here.
Goldbully
Posts: 18,073 ✭✭✭✭✭
If anyone gets the grade correct on this coin, I will be amazed.
If you are familiar with this coin, please recuse yourself from playing the guess the grade of the CBH game.




3
Comments
Wow, nice! I'd say MS65.
I'm in the MS64 camp.
Kind regards,
George
Looks 64 to me.Reverse looks 65.
If not for the stretched stars and capped denticles in places, I'd swear it was a specimen strike/proof. Looks to be a special coin of sorts. Last time I saw something looking like this was an earlier date NGC MS66 CBH from RCNH around 8-12 yrs ago. Warren Mills thought it was possibly a proof. Went up for auction (FUN?) in the MS66 holder and brought Proof money $80K-$90K as I recall. A regular MS66 would have been no more than $12K-$25K. Next time out it was regraded as PF66 or higher and asking price was 6 figures....iirc.
MS66PL though it could be even higher. Very impressive imo. Full mirrors, no sign of field luster. A small series of reed cuts along here lower bust line, suggesting coin to coin contact at the mint, not usually seen on proofs/specimens.
Can't help but think it's a proof with that strike, but not possible with the stars and how they are stretched (was thinking the same thing as roadrunner) and I bet it has mirrored surfaces too.
Going to guess MS64 PL....whatever it is, I want it!!!
That thing is beautiful in every way. I'm not so hot at grading these do don't reach though the monitor and slap me. I believe it's a VERY pretty 64. It's just beautiful and I mean that. She is a gorgeous old girl
Holds her age well.
Don't have my Overton book with me but first thought was maybe one of the AB's ?
Couple tics here and there...lips, garment, but overall she has that look.
Hope those obverse lines aren't a problem that doesn't show well in pics, but looks all of 65.
Proof 66?
Sunshine Rare Coins
sunshinecoins.com/store/c1/Featured_Products.html
The 3-4 dots that are seen along her lower bust line I believe are actually remnants of the ejection arm as the coin was released from the coin chamber....thus, showing its MS and NOT a proof, in my opinion.
NGC MS67
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
NGC PF67.
Lance.
I agree with the remarks about the stretched stars...I'll guess 66+/67
MS-66+*
That thing is gorgeous!
I only have one of these, in my type set.
So I am far from an expert, but I see no rubs or bumps anywhere, really a beautiful half!
MS67
Bst transactions with: dimeman, oih82w8, mercurydimeguy, dunerlaw, Lakesammman, 2ltdjorn, MattTheRiley, dpvilla, drddm, CommemKing, Relaxn, Yorkshireman, Cucamongacoin, jtlee321, greencopper, coin22lover, coinfolio, lindedad, spummybum, Leeroybrown, flackthat, BryceM, Surfinxhi, VanHalen, astrorat, robkool, Wingsrule, PennyGuy, al410, Ilikecolor, Southcounty, Namvet69, Commemdude, oreville, Leebone, Rob41281, clarkbar04, cactusjack55, Collectorcoins, sniocsu, coin finder
58
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
NGC PF-67 O-101 R.7
R.I.P. Bear
Interesting theory drddm. They are rather small "dots" without much depth and not with the shovel head or diamond shape of typical reed hits.
Large date and Large letters...
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
Here is an 1834 on Coinfacts with stretched stars. "estimated grade of PR66". Same die marriage (O.101).
Lance.
Wow, gorgeous coin, Lance.
I think that's exactly what they are...in his MB44 catalog, Sheridan Downey writes about the 3 dots as follows:
"They are the footprint of the mechanism used to eject freshly minted specie from the coining chamber. They are often seen on dates in the 1830’s."
My original guess was MS 65 PL, but after seeing Lance's post above, perhaps it is a proof. I'm not an expert, anyone know for sure whether or not the presence of the dots eliminates it from proof possibility?
The coin appears to be a proof, and a nice one! Certainly in "gem" grade range.
I can't decide if it is MS or PF, but I'll give it a 67
I say PR66. One sweet bust half!
I am in there proof camp, the fields to me just have the mirrored look, I would guess a 66.
It does have the sharpness of a proof strike. The eagle is absolutely hammered--razor sharp.
I will say 66.... really not sure of PF due to rims/stars..... Cheers, RickO
63
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
Should I release the grade tonight or tomorrow night?
Tonight!! Lol
"We want the Flory Dories! We want the Flory Dories!".
PF67
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1834-CAPPED-BUST-50C-NGC-PR-67-/201787650185?hash=item2efb7b3089:g:V~8AAOSw-0xYgC2~
You guys blow me away with your coin knowledge.
Great work to all players.
Special kudos to Lance and cameonut2011 who nailed it!!!
Not only nailed it. The picture Lance posted is the exact same coin.
This coin was in the Oct 1992 Stack's Starr auction. The catalog includes an interesting 3 page essay on Early American Specimen Proof Coins covering thoughts on the difficulty in defining early proofs vs prooflike.
It doesn't show an author and not sure if it is online somewhere or not. The collection had a large number of Pre 1858 Proof coins including many Bust coins.
"To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Ha. You are right! I should have noticed.
Lance.
A great example of having fun with your coins. I was scratching my head as I viewed your CoinFacts post, Lance.
A very special dreamy look to the coin. Thanks for sharing.
Nice job Lance. You got it right on day 1. The highest grade CAC has stickered one of these is PF64. The Starr coin was graded no higher than PF66 in 1998. By 2003 the pop report shows PF67's.
Very nice.... I was off a point... must be because it was not my coin...
Cheers, RickO
Good one.