NGC 2.1 Slab with a CAC Gold.

Wabbit2313 · February 11, 2017 8:47PM

I bought this coin at FUN from one of the nicest dealers I have ever met. Sent it to CAC and they kissed it with a Gold. The logo is inside the slab on the reverse, which is the unique feature of this slab. (Along with the solid white label) Coin looks 67.

Gold on the front and the back, how can you go wrong?

-

Vbowling299 · February 11, 2017 8:48PM

Love it!

Kyle · February 11, 2017 8:56PM

Very Nice!

sparky64 · February 11, 2017 9:02PM

Gorgeous. Congrats.

MarkInDavis · February 11, 2017 9:02PM

Those old no line NGC holders are among the more consistently undergraded slabs I have seen.

asheland · February 11, 2017 10:06PM

As good as it gets!

Zoins · February 11, 2017 10:07PM

Gorgeous! Classy coin in a classy holder!

oih82w8 · February 11, 2017 10:11PM

That is a beauty!

roadrunner · February 11, 2017 10:24PM

Not likely a MS64 from that era is a MS67 today. It may "look like" a MS67 at a quick glance though. Has to be a reason for the original 64 grade: scuffs, high point friction, a hairline or two in the wrong place, wipe lines, etc.

Kccoin · February 11, 2017 11:42PM

She's pretty!

How close to spot (gold)?

Bochiman · February 11, 2017 11:49PM

Looks like someone kept the slab in very good condition.
Nice looking coin, and I am not a walker fan

mkman123 · February 12, 2017 1:40AM

Love it

erwindoc · February 12, 2017 5:12AM

Pretty coin and very well struck too.

ricko · February 12, 2017 6:45AM

That is a very nice Walker... though I doubt it is a 67....certainly it is above a 64. Will you send it in or are you a slab collector? Cheers, RickO

Wabbit2313 · February 12, 2017 10:17AM

@ricko said:
That is a very nice Walker... though I doubt it is a 67....certainly it is above a 64. Will you send it in or are you a slab collector? Cheers, RickO

Thanks. I bought it for the slab. It was not cheap! Here is an old thread on the subject. Someone here used to keep the census for these.

https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/842362/the-official-2-1-slab-population-census-111-listed/p1

dpoole · February 12, 2017 10:48AM

I guess there may be smoething visible in hand, but based on what I can see in the picture, I can't imagine that was a true 64 in ANY grading era.

rhedden · February 12, 2017 10:57AM

I can see anything in the photos that would suggest it is less than MS67 by today's standards. Give it a good inspection by rotating under a bright lamp, and let us know if you find any faint hairlines. If there isn't a lurking problem of some sort, this might be the most undergraded coin I've ever seen in a slab.

Unknown · February 12, 2017 11:20AM

This content has been removed.

Justacommeman · February 12, 2017 11:25AM

WTG B!!

That's how you do it. What's not to love!

mark

logger7 · February 12, 2017 11:48AM

What kept it back? Strike? At that point what were those selling for in current dollars? That may explain the tight grading especially on gem Morgans, supply was tight, prices were very high so the standards were stricter.