Home U.S. Coin Forum

Did the Mint experiment with any prototype Proof packaging back in 1950?

UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭

Today I was appraising a group of proof sets (1942-1955). The 1950 was in cellophane much like, but not identical to 1955-64 proof sets. The coins were far above average in strike, beautifully toned, and the silver coins were cameos. Anybody have any thoughts? Special presentation maybe?

I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.

Comments

  • U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 6,684 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maybe it was privately assembled? Some dealers and companies made their own mint and proof sets (like the 82 and 83 sets that are similar but aren't the official souvenir sets). It likely would not be that difficult to recreate the packaging and even include the envelope.
    However, I'm only guessing and would love to know if anyone has more information.

  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 6,046 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It has been long rumored that some larger coin dealers got special treatment from the mint.
    This may also apply to some collectors that have had a long relationship with the mint.

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So was it more pliable and less brittle than what is usually seen?
    What do the staples look like?
    My guess is an aftermarket type deal, but that's just my guess as I've never seen anything but the traditional packaging.

  • UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,366 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No staples. It's very similar to the traditional flat packs of 1955-1964

    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have seen 1950 sets at shows... did not notice a difference.... so might be a 'special' assembled set..Cheers, RickO

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,029 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My guess is a private repackaging.

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," due out late 2025.
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,800 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Did the machinery to package the flat pack 1955-1964 sets exist in 1950? The answer to this question may answer the OP's question as well. (I don't know the answer.)

    All glory is fleeting.
  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,395 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've never seen a 1950 proof set in anything that resembles a flat pack. I think the Captain is right - private repackaging.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file