Also, there is no "S" mintmark, which the
proofs have, unless you were hoping yours
was the next Proof Bicentennial Ike without
the "S" Mintmark.......which it's not.....sorry...
Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 49+-Year PNG Member...A full numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022
Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
Comments
Looks like business Strike to me, unless it's an impaired circulated proof. Not an expert though I have handled hundreds.
http://www.pcgs.com/SetRegistry/publishedset.aspx?s=142753
https://www.autismforums.com/media/albums/acrylic-colors-by-rocco.291/
It looks like a business strike to me.
CCAC Representative of the General Public
Columnist for The Numismatist
2021 Young Numismatist of the Year
It's a business strike, no question about it.
Also, there is no "S" mintmark, which the
proofs have, unless you were hoping yours
was the next Proof Bicentennial Ike without
the "S" Mintmark.......which it's not.....sorry...
for PCGS. A 49+-Year PNG Member...A full numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022
What Fred said.
Thank yall for the info
A proof even in that condition would still have square rims and reflective (and basined surfaces) in protected areas.
@lindastokesbaker....Welcome aboard..... Cheers, RickO