Home U.S. Coin Forum

Comments

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 14, 2016 7:38AM

    Most are real some are fake.

    Indian fake, 51D fake

  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 3,646 ✭✭✭✭✭

    By my count, 5 real errors, 7 fake errors on real coins.

  • coindeucecoindeuce Posts: 13,474 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PMD is frequently fantasized by the uninformed as Mint Error.

    "By my count, 5 real errors, 7 fake errors on real coins" This.

    "Everything is on its way to somewhere. Everything." - George Malley, Phenomenon
    http://www.americanlegacycoins.com

  • MedalCollectorMedalCollector Posts: 1,993 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1) 1965 25c - Broadstruck
    2) 1993 25c - PSD, At first I thought struck through, but I actually believe this to be post-strike damage
    3) 1938 1c - Offcenter, corroded & cleaned
    4) 1961 D 1c - Double struck rotated in collar (authenticity of error questionable)
    5) 1983 1c - Struck on tapered planchet
    6)190x 1c - PSD
    7) 1951 D 1c - PSD, modified to appear multistruck
    8) 1941 S 10c - double clip, possibly 1 straight clip and 1 curved clip. This one is impressive and is almost certainly legit.
    9) 1944 1c - double struck, flipped in collar (authenticity of error questionable)
    10) 1850 1c - PSD, possibly acid
    11)1970 10c - PSD, damaged/bent
    12)1943 1c - Curved clip, likely legit but unsure based on the photos

    My guess: 5 errors, 2 questionable, 5 modified/damaged

  • seanqseanq Posts: 8,694 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @GoldenEgg said:
    1) 1965 25c - Broadstruck
    2) 1993 25c - PSD, At first I thought struck through, but I actually believe this to be post-strike damage
    3) 1938 1c - Offcenter, corroded & cleaned
    4) 1961 D 1c - Double struck rotated in collar (authenticity of error questionable)
    5) 1983 1c - Struck on tapered planchet
    6)190x 1c - PSD
    7) 1951 D 1c - PSD, modified to appear multistruck
    8) 1941 S 10c - double clip, possibly 1 straight clip and 1 curved clip. This one is impressive and is almost certainly legit.
    9) 1944 1c - double struck, flipped in collar (authenticity of error questionable)
    10) 1850 1c - PSD, possibly acid
    11)1970 10c - PSD, damaged/bent
    12)1943 1c - Curved clip, likely legit but unsure based on the photos

    My guess: 5 errors, 2 questionable, 5 modified/damaged

    I agree with most of what GoldenEgg said (and I think him for sparing me the effort of typing it all out), with the following exceptions / additions:

    4) 99% certain this is a fake, there were a bunch of multi-struck coins of this date that were illustrated in a book by Frank Spadone which are now known to be from false dies, this is right in keeping with others I have seen which were called counterfeit.

    5) Pretty sure this is just a weak strike, or maybe struck through grease, I would be very surprised if it weighed less than an ordinary cent like you would expect from a tapered planchet.

    8) 100% legit double clip, nearly overlapping. Terrific coin.

    9) I am 99% sure this one is not a legitimate flip-over double strike. This is perhaps the most deceptive of the similar coins you have shared, but the rim designs do not line up properly like you would expect from a coin struck twice in the collar. Look how far UNUM and the right wheat ear is away from the rim.

    12) 100% legit single clip.

    Sean Reynolds

    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,859 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with what GoldenEgg and Sean said,
    with these observations:

    4 - Although I'm fairly certain it might be counterfeit, it's hard to know for sure

        because of the harsh cleaning and light polishing.  I don't like how the date
        of the first strike is flattened, compared t the date of the second strike. Probably NG
    

    5 Looks like a weak strike, but it should be weighed, just in case is on a slightly

        rolled thin or tapered planchet.
    

    9 Fake/False Dies, without a doubt.

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,859 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How the heck did I get those huge Letters?

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • TommyTypeTommyType Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FredWeinberg said:
    How the heck did I get those huge Letters?

    You always seem to have error posts? :D

    Easily distracted Type Collector
  • rickoricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Great thread.... and I certainly defer to the experts here..... quite educational. Threads such as these should be in an archive for reference purposes. Cheers, RickO

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file